• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/46

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

46 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Content based regulation
Strict Scrutiny
Content neutral regulation
Intermediate Scrutiny
Prior restraints (stopping speech before occurs)
Strict Scrutiny
Gag orders to prevent prejudicial pretrial publicity
Unconstitutional
BUT must be complied with until they are vacated
If violate court order, barred from later challenging it
Requiring license for speech
OK ONLY if
(1) there is an important reason for licensing
(2) there are clear criteria, leaving almost no discretion to the licensing authority
(3) there are procedural safeguards (prompt determination of requests for licenses and judicial review of license denials)
Vagueness
A reasonable person cannot tell what speech is prohibited and what is allowed
Overbreadth
Statute regulates substantially more speech than the Constitution allows to be regulated
Fighting words
Words that, when addressed to an ordinary citizen, are inherently likely to incite immediate physical retaliation (not protected)
True threats
statements meant to communicate an intent to place an individual or group in fear of bodily harm (not protected)
Limiting sanctions to cases where words seek to insult on basis of race, religion or sexual orientation
NOT allowed -- viewpoint discrimination
Symbolic speech (conduct)
Govt can regulate if
(1) it has an important interest
(2) govt interest is unrelated to the suppression of the message
(3) impact on communication is no greater than necessary to achieve govt's goal
Flag burning
protected speech
Draft card burning
NOT protected
Nude dancing
NOT protected
Burning Cross
Protected (unless true threat)
Contributions to get a particular candidate elected
Can be limited
Contributions independent of a particular candidate
Cannot be limited (incl if made by corporations, unions)
Ballot petitions
Govt can require disclosure of names and addresses of people who sign ballot petitions

Serves state interest in promoting transparency and accountability
Govt funding of speech
Upheld under rational review (rationally related to legitimate state interest)
Obscenity
Not protected speech

(1) material must appeal to prurient interest, or shameful or morbid interest in sex (community standard)
(2) material must be patently offensive
(3) material must lack serious artistic, literary, political or scientific value (national standard)

Govt may not punish private possession

Govt can seize all assets of businesses convicted of violating obscenity laws
Child pornography
Can be completely banned, even if not obscene

Children must have been used in production of material

Govt can punish private possession
Profane & Indecent speech
generally protected
Except in schools, on radio
Commercial speech
Protected under intermediate scrutiny: narrowly tailored to achieve important govt interest; need not be least restrictive alternative

Exceptions: NOT protected
(1) advertising for illegal activity
(2) false and deceptive ads
(3) speech that inherently risks deception (e.g., in-person solicitation of clients by lawyers)
Public official, public figure, person running for public office
+ Defamation suit
P must show
(1) statement was false
(2) statement was made with actual malice
Prive figure
Public concern
Defamation suit
Can get compensatory damages by proving
(1) statement was false
(2) D was negligent in investigating

To get presumed / punitive damages
Must show actual malice
Private figure
Private concern
Defamation suit
P can recover presumed/punitive damages WITHOUT showing actual malice
Intentional infliction of emotional distress for defamatory speech
same rules as for defamatory speech (public figure must show actual malice, etc)
Truthful reporting of information that was legally obtained from govt records
NO liability allowed (e.g., name of rape victim)
Broadcasting tape of illegally recorded phone call
NO liability
- where media did not participate in illegality
- and where involves issue of public importance
Speech by govt employees in performance of job duties
NOT protected by First Amendment
Public forums
government properties that the govt is constitutionally required to make available for speech

designated public forum: govt property that govt could close off to speech, but choses voluntarily to open to speech

E.g., Parks, Sidewalks
Regulation of speech in public forums or designated public forums
(1) Subject matter & viewpoint neutral? Then OK
(2) If not --> must meet strict scrutiny (no requirement of least restrictive alternative)
Time, place or manner regulation in public forum
Must
(1) serve an important government purpose
(2) leave open adequate alternative places for communication
Limited public forum
Govt properties that are limited to certain groups or dedicated to the discussion of certain subjects

Govt can regulate speech in limited public forums as long as regulation is reasonable and viewpoint neutral (need not be subject matter neutral)
Non public forums
Govt properties that govt constitutionally can and does close off to speech

Regulation must be viewpoint neutral, must be reasonable
Examples of non public forums
(1) Military bases
(2) Areas outside prisons and jails
(3) Schools
(4) Signs on public property
(5) Sidewalks outside post office
Sidewalks
Public forum
Except for area outside post office
Airport
Govt can prohibit solicitation of money
Govt cannot prohibit distribution of literature
Private property
NO First Amendment right of access to private property
Freedom of Association
Laws prohibiting or punishing group membership must meet strict scrutiny
When can govt punish membership in a group?
(1) person must actually be affiliated with the group
(2) person must have knowledge of group's illegal activities
(3) person must have the specific intent of furthering those illegal activities or objectives
Laws requiring disclosure of group membership
Must meet strict scrutiny IF disclosure would chill association
When Freedom of Association protects a right to discriminate
(1) intimate association
(2) discrimination is integral to the expressive activities of the group (boy scouts)
When can govt employer ask a prospective employee about membership in an organization?
When membership is relevant to the loyalty and competence of the prospective employee
When can pretrial criminal proceeding be closed to the press?
(1) Closure is essential to preserve a higher value
(2) Order is narrowly drawn
Clear and present danger test
State can forbid someone from
(1) Advocating the use of force or
(2) Advocating the violation of law if

If such advocacy
(1) is directed to producing or inciting imminent lawless action and
(2) is likely to produce such action