Final Public Speaking

Front 1

audience background factors

Back 1

listener interest
listener attitude
listener knowledge

Front 2

audience outcome goals

Back 2

cognitive change
behavioral change
affective change

Front 3

definition strategies

Back 3

verbal examples -exemplars, non exemplars, dictionary def.

sensory- see, hear, touch

Secondary definition- hominyms and acronyms

Front 4

description organizational strategies

Back 4

spatial

parts of a whole

sensory

time order

Front 5

Types of comparison speeches

Back 5

explain complex ideas

explain common things in a new way

assist in making a decision

Front 6

Memorization strategies

Back 6

intrinsic and extrinsic rewards

vivid language

humor

associations

repetition

Front 7

types of evidence

Back 7

self evident- no evidence needed

Direct observation- seeing is believing

testimony- statement from expert

circumstantial evidence- set of circumstances indicates that something may have happened

Front 8

types of expert testimony

Back 8

expert opinion

statistics

factual data

Front 9

types of factual data

Back 9

quantitative data- salary

informative statements- odd highways goes north and south

examples- I35 goes north and south

exhibits-photos

Front 10

causal arguments

Back 10

one event leads to another

challenge

Front 11

sign arguements

Back 11

the presence of one event is used to indicate the presence of some condition. (door bell sign of someone at the door)

Front 12

inductive generalization

Back 12

inference is made from a subset of a population to the whole population

Front 13

analogy

Back 13

proceeds from the similarity of two objects in a category and uses it to assume they share the third

Front 14

challenge to causal argument

Back 14

whether the alleged cause was present at the time

capable of producing that effect

Front 15

challenge to sign argument

Back 15

how reliable the sign is of indicating the condition

the number of signs that corroborate the conclusion

Front 16

challenge to inductive generalization

Back 16

size and comp. of sample

Front 17

challenge to analogy

Back 17

number of features shared by objects

extent to which the features are relevant to the conclusion

Front 18

valid argument

Back 18

not possible that the premises are true and the conclusion is false

Front 19

sound argument

Back 19

true premises and is valid

Front 20

serial argument

Back 20

a
b
c

c
d
e

e
f
g

Front 21

linked argument

Back 21

a
b
c

d
e
f

g
h
i

based on c, f, i
j
k

Front 22

qualifier

Back 22

indicates the degree of support for the conclusion

probably, maybe