Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
146 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Contract Definition
|
Legally enforceable exchange of promised, or the exchange of a promise for an act.......... Brings predictability to business transactions
|
|
Promise <-> Promise
Promise <-> Act |
bilateral K
unilateral K |
|
Case Law
|
The origin of K law; has been modified by statutes and summarized in Restatement of the Law of Contracts
|
|
Uniform Commercial Code (UCC)
|
Purpose is to obtain uniformity in state contract laws (all states have adopted UCC in whole or part); applies to sales of goods
|
|
Contract Classification: Express/Implied Ks
|
(written/verbal words v. conduct)
|
|
Contract Classification Void, Voidable, Valid Ks
|
(illegality/defect in formation)
|
|
Contract Classification Unilateral/Bilateral Ks
|
(promise for act v. promise for promise)
|
|
Contract Classification Executed/Executory Ks
|
(all terms performed)
|
|
Contract Classification Quasi-K
|
Contract that the court implies
|
|
Offer (Initiates possible K)
|
1) Must be communicated (by offeror to offeree)
2) Must be evidence of intent to enter K 3) Offer must be definite (subject matter/quantity/price) 4) Can be terminated |
|
Contracts can be terminated by....
|
•Lapse of time (must respond w/in reasonable time)
•Death of offeror or offeree •Destruction of subject matter •Offeree’s rejection/counteroffer •Revocation by offeror b/4 acceptance |
|
Offeree’s rejection/counteroffer
|
Common Law- An offeree sends a counteroffer, there is no contract until both sides come to a complete full agreement
UCC- As long as some terms match the original offer, a contract can be made |
|
Revocation by offeror b/4 acceptance
|
if offeree pays an option, offer held for 30 days; UCC 2-205 imposes 90 days for written offers by one merchant to another
|
|
Elements of a Legal Contract
|
•Offer
•Acceptance •Consideration •Genuine Assent •Competency •Legal Object (K's subject must be lawful) |
|
Acceptance of a K
|
Offeree must show intent to accept (words/conduct/writing)
Intent must be communicated by reasonable means Must mirror the terms of the offer (common law, not UCC) |
|
Contracts that Must be in Writing (laws come from Statute of Frauds)
|
1) Real Estate contract (interest in land)
2) Contracts to Pay Debts of Another 3) Contracts not Performable in 1 Year (date) 4) Sale of Goods $500 or More (3 exceptions) 5) Certain Non-business Ks (marriage & debts of deceased) |
|
Sale of Goods $500 or More need a writen contract(3 exceptions)
|
One party admits to oral K (in writing or court)
Buyer accepts and uses the goods K between merchants (when merchant got written confirm of oral K and did not object w/in 10 days) |
|
Parol (Oral) Evidence Rule
|
When parties have a written K, any prior or contemporaneous oral Ks with different terms are invalid and inadmissible in court
|
|
Parol (Oral) Evidence Rule.... Main Exceptions....
|
Oral agreements to clear up ambiguity in written K
Oral agreements to prove fraud, duress, mistake, lack of capacity, illegality, undue influence |
|
Donee-Beneficiary K
|
Type of 3rd Party Beneficiary Ks Promisor gives promise to promesee to make gift to a 3rd person (ex. Life insurance)
|
|
Creditor-Beneficiary K
|
Type of 3rd Party Beneficiary Ks Creditor-Beneficiary K
• Promisor gives promise to promisee to fulfill promisee’s legal obligation to a 3rd party |
|
Case 10-2
|
o Citation:
The Private Movie Company, Inc v. Pamela Lee Anderson et al. Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles (1997) o Facts: Pamela Anderson sueed for alleged breach of contract for her failure to perform in movie Plaintiff’s original script was sent to Lee, which she indicated that she liked very much except for the nudity and sexual content. o Issue: Did Pamela Lee agree to perform in a movie Did Pamela Lee enter a binding contract with Private Movie Company Does an acceptance of an offer have to be absolute and unconditional in order for a contract to be created? o Conclusion Plaintiff did not prove that a contract existed |
|
Material breaches
|
are substantial and often intentional; substantial performance will not be recognized; injured party may sue for damages (breaching party may get chance to cure)
|
|
Accord & Satisfaction
|
Type of way to void an existing contract: Parties may wish to substitute a totally new agreement
|
|
Novation
|
Type of way to void an existing contract: Parties may wish to substitute new parties and keep the same duties
|
|
Condition Precedent
|
event that must take place to give rise to duty of performance (attorney approval)
|
|
Condition Subsequent
|
an event, following execution of K, that terminates K (act of war)
|
|
Commercial Impracticality
|
Type of way to void a Contract: Unanticipated situation that makes performance unreasonably expensive, injurious, or costly
|
|
Ex- plastic manufacturer becomes short of raw materials b/c of war & embargo, and can’t find alternative source for similar price
|
Commercial Impracticality
|
|
Impossibility of Performance
|
1) Situation in which the party cannot legally or physically perform the K
2) Performance must be “objectively impossible” (no person or company could perform the K) 3) Three most common situations: •Death or illness •Change of law making the performance illegal •Destruction of K’s subject matter |
|
Mutual Agreement
|
Type of way to void a contract: both parties withdraw and walk away, Novation, Accord & Satisfaction
|
|
Compensatory Damages
|
If injury occurs, money can replace the value of work or materials promised in a K
|
|
Punitive Damages
|
to punish and frighten D (rare in K case)
|
|
Liquidated Damages
|
interest stipulated in K when payments are made late
|
|
Nominal Damages
|
small amount awarded when damages can’t be proven; P can try and win court fees and charges
|
|
Rescission
|
cancellation of K (fraud/duress/undue influence)
|
|
Injunction
|
temporary or permanent order that prevents a party on a contract from doing something specific or anything at all
|
|
Reformation
|
correction of K terms to help and create a better understanding between parties
|
|
Tort
|
injury to another person or property
|
|
Tortfeasor
|
the wrongdoers (person who commits the tort)
|
|
Compensatory Damages
|
To put person in same position he/she would have been in if tort had not occurred (makes the victim “whole”)
E.x.--> medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, property repair |
|
Nominal Damages
|
Recognizes that P was wronged by D
P cannot prove damages that require compensation Usually a small amount (like $1); allows for punitive damages |
|
Punitive Damages
|
To punish D for unconscionable, obvious, or offensive act(s)
Must accompany compensatory or nominal damages Punitive award violates US Constitution if “grossly excessive” |
|
Defamation
|
Saying/publishing something false about someone’s reputation/charter
|
|
False Imprisonment
|
Detaining/confining someone without justification
|
|
EX: Telling lady that her son is lying dead in the street when you know it is not true
|
Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress
|
|
EX: Wiretapping; Using someone’s password to hack into their home computer’s email
|
Invasion of Privacy
|
|
EX: Shooting/stabbing/punching/ groping/spitting on someone
|
Battery
|
|
EX: Pointing a gun at someone
|
Assault
|
|
EX: Borrowing neighbor’s car without permission
|
Trespassing
|
|
EX: Borrowing car without permission and totaling it
|
Conversion
|
|
EX: Offending or insulting a business product or service
|
Disparagement
|
|
EX: Luring employee to work for you when you know they have an existing employment K with current company
|
International Interference w/a Contract
|
|
Unfair Competition
|
Going into business in order to harm someone else’s business (no genuine profit motive)
|
|
EX: Father wants son to go to college. Son wants to open a painting business (and does so). Father goes into painting business and underbids son on all jobs in order to put son out of business (hopefully forcing him to go to college)
|
Unfair Competition
|
|
EX: A customer tells Starbucks manager a good idea for business, which the company uses successfully and makes increase profits. Starbucks fails to compensate the customer for his/her idea.
|
Misappropriation
|
|
Misappropriation
|
Using someone’s unsolicited idea in a business, and then failing to compensate them if the idea is successful (does not include employees, who are expected to come up with ideas to help business)
|
|
Res ipsa loquitor
|
Act can’t be explained any other way than defendant’s negligence (no witnesses present)
|
|
Negligence per se
|
Defendant violated rule and is inherently negligent
Ex- selling Nyquil to minors **Violates a law that provides safety** |
|
Contributory Negligence
|
If any percent is P's fault, they cannot win a lawsuit
|
|
Product Liability: 3 Theories of Recovery
|
Strict Product Liability (most common)
Negligence Breach of Warranty |
|
Product Liability: Negligent Warning
|
-If a product is dangerous in its ordinary use or reasonably foreseeable use, warning required
-Sometimes a warning must be accompanied by graphics (children/illiterate) |
|
Product Liability: Negligent Design
|
If risk of harm outweigh utility/use of product
|
|
Express Warranty
|
written or verbal—seller tells buyer that a ladder will support a 200 pound person
|
|
Implied warranty of fitness for particular purpose
|
seller knows buyer wants good for particular purpose—farmer needed special engine oil for a John Deere Engine
|
|
Implied warranty of merchantability
|
goods reasonably fit for ordinary use— latex rubber gloves
|
|
Strict Product Liability, protects
|
Protects against a defective product that made the product unreasonably dangerous, and caused P's injury
|
|
Strict Product Liability, how to prove a product is defective (hardest part)
|
• Some flaw or abnormality in construction (dead mouse in bottle of Squirt; shattering jar of peanuts)
• Failure to adequately warn of potential risks • Defective design (entire product line becomes questionable; recall may result) |
|
Market Share Liability
|
used when it is difficult to trace a product to a particular manufacturer
|
|
EX: A child chokes on a small toy and dies. But there was no proper labeling allowing the family to pinpoint the one company responsible for the production of the toy.... The liability to pay the suing family relies upon the plastic company, the assembly company, and the shipping company
|
Market Share Liability
|
|
Service Liability
|
Applies against Doctors, Accts, Lawyers, generally malpracticed actions based on negligence, breach of K, or fraud.
|
|
Ultamares Doctrine
|
accountants are liable only to those in privity-of-contract relationship with the accountant (i.e., the client)
|
|
Restatement (2nd) of Torts (new standard)
|
expands liability to include intended users of the information (i.e., anyone who will rely on the accountant’s work)
|
|
Revocation
|
an offeror can revoke the offer any time before acceptance
|
|
3 Kinds of Property
|
Real, Personal & Intellectual Property
|
|
Estate in Land
|
determines duration/extent of property rights
|
|
Estate: Fee Simple Absolute
|
write to own and possess land against all others, without conditions
|
|
Estate: Conditional Estate
|
same as F.S.A. except subject to a condition (event or nonevent) that terminates the interest
|
|
Estate: Easement
|
irrevocable right to use portion of someone’s land for specific purpose. Arises in 3 ways:
• by express agreement (utility company runs power lines) • by prescription (when one openly uses portion of property) • by necessity (when a property is divided and one portion becomes landlocked) |
|
Estate: License
|
temporary, revocable right to be on property (public has a license to enter business property)
|
|
Estate: Life Estate
|
right to own and possess until death
• Holder cannot “waste” property (do something that destroys value, or fail to make necessary repairs) • The “future interest” usually passes in F.S.A. to next person |
|
Estate: Leasehold Estate
|
Right to possess property temporarily
• Lease – K that transfers the possessory interest • Owner- lessor/landlord, Leaseholder – lessee/tenant |
|
Fraud
|
misrep of fact with intent to deceive
|
|
Duress
|
wrongful act or threat that prevents free will
|
|
Undue Influence
|
mental coercion by stronger party
|
|
Real Property: Attached
|
if removal would cause damage, or if essential to the functioning of the structure
|
|
Real Property: Fixture
|
personal property that becomes part of real property when permanently attached (except by written agreement, or if a “trade fixture”)
|
|
Personal Property
|
may be tangible or intangible
|
|
Intellectual Property
|
created by mental processes
|
|
Co-Ownership Joint Tenancy
|
own = shares; may sell w/out other’s consent; upon death share divided among other joint tenants
|
|
Co-Ownership: Tenancy in Common
|
may have unequal shares; can sell w/out other’s consent; upon death heirs receive share
|
|
Co-Ownership: Tenancy by the Entirety
|
for married couples; cannot sell w/out other’s consent; upon death all goes to surviving spouse
|
|
Co-ownership: Condominium
|
owner gets title to unit & undivided interest in all “common areas”; CC&Rs govern the property
|
|
Co-Ownership: Cooperative
|
resident is an investor who acquires stock in corp that owns apt bldg; gets permanent lease for 1 unit
|
|
Involuntary Transfer of R.P: Condemnation
|
-Process by which government acquires ownership of property for public use (under “Takings Clause”)
|
|
Involuntary Transfer of R.P: Adverse Possession
|
Person openly treats property as his/her own (actually resides on or uses it)
Owner doesn’t give permission, but doesn’t protest either Must be done for a defined legal period |
|
Variance
|
the permission to use land in manner prohibited by zoning
|
|
Personal Property
|
Any property that is not real property: furniture, cars, bank account, stocks
|
|
Most transfers of Personal Property don't require formalities, except...
|
motor vehicles, watercraft, airplanes
|
|
Voluntary Transfer of Personal Property:
Involuntary Transfer of Personal Property: |
Sales & Gifts
Abandoned, Lost, Mislaid (person who owns property where item was left, now owns it) |
|
Trade Dress
|
Overall appearance/image of product; gets same protection as trademark (Ex- copying famous golf holes; restaurant design; shampoo bottle)
|
|
Trade Secret
|
Process, product, method use in a business that is not known to public (may bestow a competitive edge)............ Competitor can discover lawfully (reverse engineering, public tour)
|
|
Tying arrangement
|
patent holder gives license to use the patented object only if licensee agrees to buy a non-patented object from the holder
|
|
Cross-licensing
|
2 patent holders license each other to use their patents, on condition that neither licenses to anyone else w/out other’s consent
|
|
Principal-Agent (mostly employer-employee; not always)
|
• Expressed Authority
o Authority arising from specific statements made by the principal to the agent • Actual Authority o Expressed authority + authority customarily given to agent in an industry/trade/profession |
|
Expressed Authority
|
Authority given directly by principal to agent (employee)
|
|
Actual Authority
|
Expressed authority + authority that is implied with the job or task at hand
|
|
Expressed Agency
|
If agreement longer than 1 year, must be in writing
Power-of-Attorney document often establishes relationship |
|
Agency Through Ratification
|
When person misrepresents himself as agent, and principal accepts (ratifies) the unauthorized act
-Two conditions necessary for ratification to be effective: -P must have full knowledge of A’s action -3rd party must be made aware before |
|
Agency by Implied Authority
|
Express agreements often fail to cover every detail
Custom and circumstances determine A’s authority Courts have allowed As to receive payments of $ due to P, hire/fire employees, buy equipment/supplies, enter in Ks |
|
Duty Compensation
|
Principal Duty to Agent: even if no written agreement, it is implied that P will compensate A for services (flat fee, hourly fee, contingency fee)
|
|
Duty of Reimbursement (Indemnification)
|
Principal Duty to Agent: P must reimburse A for losses/expenses incurred while acting on P’s behalf
|
|
Duty of Cooperation
|
Principal Duty to Agent: P cannot interfere with A’s reasonable conduct (allowed conduct usually defined in agreement)
|
|
Duty to Provide Safe Working Conditions
|
Principal Duty to Agent: P must comply with basic safety standards, like those mandated by OSHA
|
|
Duty of Obedience
|
Agent Duty to Principal: A must follow all of P’s reasonable and lawful instructions
|
|
Duty of Performance
|
Agent Duty to Principal: A must use reasonable care and skill in performing work; live up to standards customary in the trade
|
|
Duty of Accounting
|
Agent Duty to Principal: if P requests accounting of property or money, A must do it/deliver it
|
|
Duty of Loyalty
|
Agent Duty to Principal: most important duty; arises from fiduciary duty (avoid conflicts of interest; communicate all material info to P; refrain from acting in a manner adverse to P’s interests)
|
|
Contractual Liability: Disclosed Principal
|
one whose ID is known by the 3rd party when 3rd party enters agreement negotiated by A
|
|
Contractual Liability: Undisclosed Principal
|
P’s ID and existence are both unknown to the 3rd party
|
|
Contractual Liability: Partially Disclosed Principal
|
P’s ID is not specifically known, but 3rd party knows A represents someone (P exists)
|
|
P is liable for crimes committed when A is acting on P's behalf when....
|
1) When P participates directly in A's crime
2) When P has reason to know that A is violating the law |
|
Liability for Torts Committed w/in Scope of Employment
|
-Was A (employee) acting in P’s (employer’s) interests?
-Was A authorized to be in that particular place at that time? |
|
Notice to 3rd party about Termination of Principal-Agent relationship, by law is not required when...
|
-Death of one of the parties
-Insanity of one of the parties -Bankruptcy of P -Impossibility of performance (due to loss of subject matter or change in the law) -Outbreak of war (especially b/t A and P’s countries) |
|
Global Agency Law: Japan
|
-Agents must disclose who they represent
-3rd parties often require proof that A represents P -A must have expressed authority |
|
Global Agency Law: European Union (EU)
|
-P and A must act in good faith toward each other
-A must follow P’s instructions quite literally -Agency agreements require notice of termination |
|
Sole Proprietorship
|
-Person goes into business alone
-Responsible for all profits and losses (personally liable) |
|
General Partnerships
|
-Each partner makes initial contribution of cash/realty/services
• Management & profits are normally divided equally • All partners are personally liable for the partnership’s debts |
|
Partnerships Generally
|
-Voluntary association of 2 or more people, formed to carry on a business as co-owners
• Partners have fiduciary duty to each other (trust/confidence) • Often no written agreement at the beginning (p. 437 has typical items); UPA controls if no written agreement • No perpetual existence (dissolution and winding-up occur at end) |
|
Limited Partnerships
|
• Has 1 general partner, responsible for management
• Has 1 or more limited partners that merely invest (their liability is limited to the amount they invested) • Must include “limited” or abbreviation in the name |
|
The Basics
|
• Entity created by state law; raises capital by issuing stock to investors (who own the corp)
• Corporation is legally treated as a single person |
|
Corporation: Closely Held
|
(private corporation) usually owned by small group; stock not traded on securities exchange; usually restrict sale of stock to initial shareholders
|
|
Corporation: Publicly Held (C Corp)
|
stock traded on the national exchanges; numerous shareholders are merely investors; real control is with officers and managers (who may also own stock)
|
|
Corporation: Subchapter S
|
hybrid of corp and partnership; operates like corp but taxed like partnership; no more than 35 shareholders; only 1 class of stock; no corps/partnerships can own stock
|
|
“Articles of incorporation”
|
create the entity (name, address, agent, purpose, stock, incorporators, directors)
|
|
“Bylaws”
|
are the governing regulations
|
|
Equity financing
|
-corp sells stock (equity securities)
o Stock gives shareholders right to vote and get dividend income o Stock is generally either common or preferred |
|
Debt Financing
o Notes o Bonds o Debentures |
Debt Financing
o short term o secured long term o unsecured long term |
|
Capital structure
|
percentage of debt capital, common stock and preferred stock
|
|
Shareholders
|
vote for the Directors (in person or by substitute)
|
|
Board of Directors
|
have formal management responsibility; set corporate policy; hire/fire managers and officers
|
|
Corporate Officers/Managers
|
appointed by the directors; manage corporation daily affairs
|
|
Corporate Opportunity Doctrine
|
corporate officers and directors cannot take personal advantage of an opportunity that belonged to the corporation (if they do, it’s a breach of the duty to act in best interests of corporation)............ EX: selling all of your stock because you know the value is going to fall
|
|
Business Judgment Rule
|
courts will not second-guess business decisions made in good faith by officers/directors; they are not liable for honest mistakes of business judgment
|
|
Joint Venture
|
Two or more individuals, partnerships, or corps (foreign and/or domestic) agree to finance/produce/sell something for a specific purpose or time (pool labor and/or capital)
|
|
Franchising
|
Franchisor owns trade name or trademark and allows franchisee to sell/market or distribute the good; franchisee usually pays % of gross sales to franchisor
|