• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/24

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

24 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Sheringham-Basic Info

Population- 7,500



Economy- Tourism and fishing



2nd biggest tourist attraction in North Norfolk (Cromer 1st)

Sea defences


£5.25 mn (1995-2000)


-55% paid by DEFRA


- 45% paid by local district councils from local tax payers



£280,000 annual maintenance


34km coastline protected




Groynes


Revetmnt


Seawall


Gabiens


Break water


Aim

To investigate whether the coastal defences at Sherringham are effective

Hypothesis

The beach sediment at Sherringham js significantly more built up on one side of the groynes than the other

Null hypothesis

There is no statistical difference in the build up of beach sediment on either side of the groynes at Sherringham

Geology

Glacial till (top)


West Runton Pete (organkic decomposing vegetation, easily erodable)


Weybourne crag (what's being eroded)


Chalk (under ground)

coastal erosion- Management plan

Hold the line



Advance the line



retreat (sheringham?)


Managed retreat (sheringham?)Do nothing



Do nothing

fetch

Longshore drift caused by fetch


- winter large from North


-summer north east

Factors affecting erosion

The sea-the stong winter fetch



Sub aerial processes



Human influence



Geology


-soft or hard rock


- saturated or permeable


-land releif



Land relief?



Wide beach (takes more energy out the waves)

Characteristics of my study area

Longshore drift



Geology



Management programme

Sub-aerial processes

S aturation


U ndercutting


S lumping


T ransportation

Groynes

Tropical greenhard wood ( Brazil)



30-40 yr life span


£1,000 per meter


Requires maintenance


Looks unatural and breaks up beach

Rock Armor Groynes


Made from RIP RAP and Lavi Kite rock



£1,250 per metre



Requires maintenance as rocks moved by strong currents and storms



More effective at stopping longshore drift tham wooden groynes

Flaf sea wall

Concrete /unatural


100 yr lifespan


£3,000 peretre


+maintenance

Beach nourishment


moving beach matierial from one beach to another



Replenish each year (ongoing cost)


£10 per metre cubed

Revetment

Tropical Greenheart


30-40 yr lifespan


£1,500 per metre



Weak and takes up more space on the beach

Angled sea wall

Concrete


Life span. 100 yrs


£5000 per metre


Uses beach space

Gabiens

Cages filled with beach matierial absorb the impact of the wave



£50 per cage


Shortcoming: rust and easily break

Rip ra

Granite from Norway


£1-3000 per boulded


100yr lifespan


Unattractive and dangerous


Powerful waves canoce rocks out of position

Techniques to sample Groynes

Strategic -to select Groynes with no precious measurements for them



Systematic- to select the place to measure ground depth at every 2cm interval. Prevents bias



Geographical theory



( that formed ge basis if the investigation)

- longshore drift


- sea defences - hard engineering


- wave processes


- sediment cells


- transportation (of sediment)


- sustainability


- wave orthogonals


-shoreline management plans


-



Bore pipes


Aka cliff drainage


Flexible plastic


£120 pee meter


Weakens cliff when inserted


Not very effective

How we proved our hypothesis

We analysed the groyne profile


For rid of anomalies


Then carried out a statistical significance test -Man Whitney U



Proved significance to 95% confidence


Mann Whitney U

Rank Data of both sides together, with 1 being the smallest



Add up ranks seperatly of East and West side



Count sample sizes of both columns (Nx & Ny)



Use Man Whiney U critical equations



Compare the smallest U value to the critical value (crit value was 64)



Shows significance / confidence