• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/28

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

28 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
  • 3rd side (hint)
Mallen v. Mallen
Obtained through Fraud, Duress or Mistake, or Misrep?
Unconscionable?
have facts/circumstances change to make enforcement unfair?
Fletcher
Fairness Approach
Freely entered into. no fraud +
Full disclosure & understanding of the nature, value, & extent of spouses property
Meaningful opportunity to consult with counsel
Simeone
Treat it like a normal K.
Women are no longer stupid
Absent Fraud, etc.
Uniform Premarital Agreement
Voluntary
Unconscionable
No knowledge of Prop
Marvin v. Marvin
(Co-Habitation)
Enforce Express Ks btw non marital partners except sex serv
Use Quantum Meriut if need be
Morone
(Co-Habitation)
Unwillingness to recognize imply agreements
Griswold
Encroaches on 1st amend privacy
Sub Due Process--No amount
Free from unwarranted govt intrusion
Right to Privacy encircles two married people
Eisenstadt
No grounds for diff married or unmarried. Right to Privacy is an indy right, not marital one
Lawrence v. TX
Right to have personal relation w/o being punished as criminals
Struck Down on Due Process
EP = Loop Hole
Common Law Marriage
Capacity to Enter
Continuous Habitation
Holding self out
Putative Spouse
Void due to prior marriage, but they are fine as long as good faith
Loving v. Virginia
Violates Due Process b/c marriag is a fund right.
EP b/c equal application does not mean equal protection
Michael H.
Family Unit = State Interest Preventing adulterous natural father from breaking that unit
Waited past Statutory period
Right to relationship w/ father is not fund right = rational basis
Best Interest of the Child
(w/ competing Presumptions)
Existence of Home Enviorment
Stability of present home/family
Extent Uncertainty Already Exist
Efforts/Commitment of Dad
Compelling Interest in Paternity Finality.
Parental Due Process
(Unfit Dad)
Requires a Hearing for every parent
State Interest was efficiency
Biology Plus Rule
Must have substantial Relationshi
No EP b/c you aren't truly equal
Step-Parent Adoption
Best Interest of Child No. No EP violation, unless both "equal"
Diff after Michael H.
(Hope she's not married)
Adoption Interests
Informed Decision by Parents vs.
Finality of Adoption
Must states have non-consentabl period
Factors for Adoption
Circumstance of consent
Length of Time elapsed
Conduct of parties
when withdrawl made before/after
New Standard
In the absence of Fraud, duress consent becomes final after delivery of baby
Surrogacy
If your wife gets baby, then you're father unless she did it behind your back. Presumed to agree
Best Int of Child ALWAYS
Ex Parte Divorce
Severs the Legal Relationship, but does not hash out any of the resulting problems
Property Division
Partnership Theory 50/50
Community Prop = Split 50/50
Equitable Distr = hashed out after divorce. Not automatic
Alimony
Terminates upon Remarriage
Economic Need
Limited Basis (mostly)
Separation Agreements
Courts Approve. Helps them out
Awards things courts can
Fosters Healthy Negotiation
Don't incorporate in the decree
Support Determination
Income Shared -- Amount of time with kid, chart, etc.
Salary--look at your salary (minor)
Rational Basis
Law must be rationally related to legitimate government purpose
Intermediate Scrutiny
Law must be substantially related to important government interest
Gender, Alienage
Strict Scrutiny
(Fund Rights)
Law must be narrowly tailored to achieve a compelling government interest
Race
National origin, Alienage (generally), Travel (not foreign), Voting