Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
23 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Conran |
Wife facilitated husband's earning power, but only received £10m from £85m |
|
Dart |
Husband worth £400m-£800m, awarded £9m |
|
A v A |
Husband worth £200m, awarded £4.4m after 14-year marriage |
|
White |
Yardstick of equality |
|
Miller; McFarlane |
Principal case |
|
Suter |
Child welfare important but not paramount |
|
Young v Young |
Full, frank disclosure essential |
|
Sharland v Sharland |
Hiding assets may result in costs order |
|
Mills v McCartney |
Pre-marriage assets clearly non-matrimonial so wife not entitled |
|
B v B |
Inheritance is for one spouse alone and not matrimonial assets |
|
Jones |
Non-matrimonial property generally exempt from sharing, except where needs of either party indicate need to share |
|
K v L |
Importance of source of asset can diminish over time, so after lengthy marriage distinctions between martial and non-marital property break down |
|
G v G |
Wife had previously enjoyed comfortable standard of living + court expressly referred to this when giving 50% of matrimonial assets, £1.3m |
|
GW v GW |
Court can take into account any cohabitation period before marriage |
|
Cooper-Hohn |
£337m award, wife helped with administration of business, skill/genius? |
|
H v H |
Attempted murder may be conduct |
|
S v S |
'Gasp factor' may be required for conduct |
|
Xydhias |
Separation agreement not effective until approved by court |
|
K v K |
Factors for whether prenup binding |
|
Government Green Paper 1998 |
Advice about content of prenups |
|
Crossley v Crossley |
Short marriage, prenup effective |
|
Macleod v Macleod |
Validated postnups |
|
Radmacher v Granatino |
Prenups largely endorsed falling short of legal enforceability, court should give effect to nuptial agreement freely entered into by each party with full appreciation of implications unless not fair |