Fad Test 2

Front 1

single

Back 1

a person who has never married, is divorced, or widowed

Front 2

voluntary temporary singles

Back 2

unmarried adults who are delaying marriage while pursuing education or establishing career

Front 3

voluntary stable singles

Back 3

unmarried adults who desire a single lifestyle

Front 4

involuntary temporary singles

Back 4

singles actively searching for a mate but have not yet found a suitable one

Front 5

involuntary stables singles

Back 5

unmarried singles who can expect to be single for life even if they may not want to be

Front 6

female friendships

Back 6

more intimate, relationship focused

Front 7

male friendships

Back 7

less intimate, activity focused

Front 8

cross sex friendships

Back 8

more common today; may be complicated with tensions

Front 9

calling

Back 9

a young man visiting in a woman's home

Front 10

dating

Back 10

occur in social settings outside of the home; may occur in pairs or groups

Front 11

cohabitating

Back 11

committed couples who are living together but are not married

Front 12

homogamy

Back 12

people who are similar in social class, ethnicity, and values

Front 13

propinquity

Back 13

geographic closeness

Front 14

pool of eligibles

Back 14

the pool of people in which we are able to choose mates

Front 15

cohabitation is linked to:

Back 15

unhappy marriages, more likely to divorce, shorter relationships

Front 16

selection effect

Back 16

characteristics of the person are more important than cohabitation itself

Front 17

experience effect

Back 17

the experience of one or more cohabitions is important

Front 18

lesbian couples

Back 18

have the most equal and less sexualized than both heterosexual and homosexual relationships

Front 19

love

Back 19

- a strong affecting for another rising from kinship and personal ties

- attraction based on sexual desires

- affection based on common interests, benevolence, and admiration

Front 20

who did not associate love with marriage?

Back 20

- ancient greek and roman mythology

- early Christianity

Front 21

12th century middle ages love

Back 21

precursors to our notion of romantic love in marriage

Front 22

feminization of love

Back 22

19th century association with love being the private work of woman in the home, namely, nurturing and caring for family memories

Front 23

industrial revolution

Back 23

men go to work and experience the stresses of labor outside the home

Front 24

romantic love

Back 24

love that comes with excitement, passion, melodrama; receives media attention

Front 25

companionate love

Back 25

love that grows over time, based on strong commitment, friendship, and trust

Front 26

limerance

Back 26

very intense emotions experienced in the early formations of attachment to an individual

Front 27

sociobiology

Back 27

theory that humans have an inscintictive impulse to pass on their genetic material

Front 28

biochemical perspectives on love

Back 28

humans are attracted to certain types of people which makes the brain release chemicals that give us a rush known as sexual attraction

Front 29

attachment theory

Back 29

that way infants form early attachments in life will effect their relationships throughout life

Front 30

secure attachment

Back 30

infants feel safe when their mothers are out of sight

Front 31

anxious/ambivalent attachment

Back 31

infants become nervous when parents leave the room and may show rejection when they come back

Front 32

avoidant attachment

Back 32

infants show little attachment to their primary parent

Front 33

sternbergs triangular theory of love

Back 33

intimacy, passion, commitment; formed eight types of love based on this

Front 34

intimacy

Back 34

closeness and sharing

Front 35

passion

Back 35

intense physical and emotional drive

Front 36

commitment

Back 36

decision to be in a relationship

Front 37

eros

Back 37

passionate, strong physical attraction

Front 38

storge

Back 38

companionate, trust, respect, mutual love

Front 39

pragma

Back 39

practical, sensible

Front 40

ludus

Back 40

playful, carefree, casual

Front 41

agape

Back 41

altruistic, kind, patient

Front 42

mania

Back 42

obsessive, possessive, intense

Front 43

Reises Wheel Theory

Back 43

based on personality need fulfillment, rapport, self revelation, and mutual dependance

Front 44

rapport

Back 44

building relationships based on mutual trust and respect

Front 45

self revelation

Back 45

sharing intimate information about one's self

Front 46

mutual dependancy

Back 46

desire to spend more time together

Front 47

personality need fulfillment

Back 47

satisfy a majority of each others emotional needs

Front 48

legitimate needs

Back 48

needs that arise in the present rather than deficits accumulated in the past

ex: emotional support, understanding, sexual sharing

Front 49

illegitimate needs

Back 49

needs arise from feelings of self doubt and worthlessness, inadequacy; may be from hurts in the past

Front 50

martyring

Back 50

trying to maintain a relationship by ignoring ones own legitimate needs and trying to fulfill or satisfy all of the partners needs

Front 51

manipulating

Back 51

seeking to control the feelings, attitudes, and behaviors of your partner

Front 52

sex

Back 52

biological characteristics determined at birth

Front 53

gender

Back 53

culturally defined attitudes and behaviors associated with and expected of the genders (what it means to be masculine vs feminine)

Front 54

gender role

Back 54

expectations about genders created by society; does not always correspond with one's sex

Front 55

gender identity

Back 55

the degree to which a person defines themselves as masculine or feminine based on society's definition of gender roles

Front 56

socialization

Back 56

the process in which society influences members to internalize attitudes, beliefs, and values; expectations

Front 57

sexual scripts

Back 57

societal norms and rules regarding sex

Front 58

standards of non marital sex

Back 58

abstinence, permissiveness with/without affection, traditional/modern double standard

Front 59

between ages 2 and 5

Back 59

children curious about genitals, touch their own, play doctor, observe others, touch mothers breasts

Front 60

when do children peek sexually

Back 60

at age 5, then declines and manifests again at around 11 or 12

Front 61

why are children maturing sexually earlier than before?

Back 61

puberty, hormones, hormones in meat, media, better nutrition

Front 62

sensitization

Back 62

recognizing that one may be homosexual

Front 63

identity confusion

Back 63

feeling conflicted about homosexual idenity

Front 64

identity assumption

Back 64

sharing with close friends and family that one is homosexual

Front 65

(homosexual) commitment

Back 65

openly living a homosexual lifestyle

Front 66

consequences of sex

Back 66

pregnancy and abortion, teen parenthood, STD's ( cant cure hpv or hsv)

Front 67

habituation

Back 67

decreased interest in sex because more access to sex partner and predictability of sexual activity over time

Front 68

communication

Back 68

exchanging and interpreting ideas and feelings

Front 69

transactional

Back 69

communication is exchanging information

Front 70

communicator

Back 70

the person who creates and sends the message; what we wear, facial expressions, tone of voice

Front 71

message

Back 71

unit of information transmitted between the sender and receiver; prepared and encoded by the communicator

Front 72

medium

Back 72

the way the message is presented to the recipient; text message, talking, note, email

Front 73

recipient

Back 73

the receiver of the message; interprets the message based on personality, life experiences, relational content

Front 74

Jon Gottman

Back 74

found that fighting or arising complaints is one of the healthiest things a couple can do for their relationship; better to deal with conflict then ignore/hide

Front 75

solvable

Back 75

conflict or problem that has a solution; ex: cutting the grass

Front 76

perpetual

Back 76

conflict or problem that can never be solved; ex: having children

Front 77

passive agression

Back 77

when someone expresses anger at someone indirectly; critisim, nagging, sabotage

Front 78

sabotage

Back 78

when a partner tries to ruin/ spoil or undermine an activity the other has planned

Front 79

displacement

Back 79

a person directs anger at the people or things that the other cherishes

Front 80

contempt

Back 80

intent to insult or abuse partner emotionally; rolling your eyes, mocking

Front 81

criticism

Back 81

attacking personality rather than the specific behavior

Front 82

defensiveness

Back 82

protecting yourself from perceived attack will escalate an argument

Front 83

stonewalling

Back 83

refusing to listen to partners complaints or stories (physically and emotionally)

Front 84

belligerence

Back 84

provocative behavior that challenges partners power and authority; "what are you gonna do about it?"

Front 85

report talk

Back 85

aimed mainly at conveying information; common for men

Front 86

rapport talk

Back 86

speaking to gain or reinforce intimacy; women

Front 87

DOMA 1996

Back 87

declaring marriage to be a legal union of one man and one woman, allowed states to refuse reciprocacy in same sex marriages, but DOMA was overturned in 2013

Front 88

marriage

Back 88

a close intimate union, relationship between husband and wife

Front 89

parallel relationship pattern

Back 89

assume traditional roles, little intimacy, live parallel lives

Front 90

interactional pattern

Back 90

partners expect companionship and intimacy, strong communication

Front 91

homogamy

Back 91

spouses share social characteristics such as social class, race, ethnicity, age, religion, education

Front 92

heterogamy

Back 92

spouses do not share social characteristics, race, religion, etc.

Front 93

endogamy

Back 93

married within one's specific cultural group

Front 94

exogamy

Back 94

married outside of one's specific cultural group

Front 95

peer marriages

Back 95

spouses consider themselves to have an equal standing in power in the relationship

Front 96

near peer marriage

Back 96

equality is important but the man does less than 40% of domestic tasks

Front 97

traditional marriages

Back 97

man holds more authority in the relationship, and both spouses were satisfied with this arrangement

Front 98

conflict habituated

Back 98

constant battle over almost everything

Front 99

devitalized

Back 99

married over several years

Front 100

passive congenial

Back 100

partners never expected emotional closeness

Front 101

vital

Back 101

being together and sharing major joys in life

Front 102

total

Back 102

almost everything is done happily together

Front 103

marriage premise

Back 103

couples acceptance to work hard to ensure that the relationship continues; expectations of permanence and primariness

Front 104

reasons for infidelity

Back 104

novelty, workplace friendships, revenge, homosexual relationship, absence from partner, marital/sexual dissatisfaction

Front 105

pronatalist bias

Back 105

having children is taken for granted, whereas not having children should be justified

Front 106

structural anti- natalism

Back 106

our values, laws, and employment policies are inimical to children and disastrous to committed parents

Front 107

total fertility rate

Back 107

average number of children born to a woman during her lifetime

Front 108

general fertility rate

Back 108

number of children born per 1000 women ages 15-44

Front 109

crude fertility rate

Back 109

number of children born per 1000 population

Front 110

opportunity

Back 110

the economic opportunities for wage earnings and investments that parents forgo when rearing children