• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/12

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

12 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Rule Number One: Raw Scores are Meaningless
*Alone, tell us very little. Must do something to it to give it meaning. In order to interpret have to be placed into context.

*Comparing an individual's response to those of his or her norm group can usually give us more in-depth information
Why are raw scores helpful?
*Tell us the relative position, within the norm group, of a person's score (compare to individual's who took the same test (same age/grade))

*Allow us to compare results among test-takers who took same test but are in different norm groups (2 children, 2 grades apart, how are they doing compared to their norm group)

*Allow us to compare test results on two or more different tests taken by the same individual (learning disability?)
Rule Number Two: God Does Not Play Dice With the Universe
*Talks about natural order and how perfect the laws of nature are

*Have great implications for testing because the concepts such as the bell-shaped curve are crucial to our understanding of norm-referenced testing and allow us to compare individuals

*Due to the natural laws of the universe, many qualities, when measured, approximate the normal curve
Rule Number Three: Z-Scores are Golden
*Great for helping us see where an individual's raw score falls on a normal curve

*Helpful for converting a raw score to other kinds of derived scores

*This is why we like to keep in mind z-scored are golden and can often be used to help us understand the meaning of scores
Anastasi: "Tests are essentially tools. Whether any tool is an instrument of good or harm depends on how the took is used."

How does this concept relate to the importance of following standardization?
*Deviations from standardization could impact meaning and interpretation of test scores!

*Tests sometimes used for shortcuts, quick solutions (simple answer to questions); Inadequate or Outdated knowledge about testing

*Need basic understanding of statistical/technical knowledge and relevant facts about behavioral science
What should counselors know about the use and interpretation of psychological tests?
1) Choose tests appropriately
2) Understand the statistical and technical aspects of tests
3) Understand what underlying constructs the tests are measuring
4) Interpret test scores properly, integrate into assessment process
Hazards in Assessment:

Hazard of the single score
*Ignoring variation in the score shown by the SEM.

*Uses a single number to represent an individual's test performance rather than allowing for random sampling flunctuations
Hazards in Assessment:

Hazard of the single time period
*Assume trait stability regardless of intervening experiences
Hazards of Assessment:

Hazard of the single indicator
*Failure to consider the moderate size of the correlations between different indicators of a behavioral construct may lead to undue reliance on scores from a single test, without corroborative and qualifying data from other tests or sources of info about a person
Hazards of Assessment:

Hazard of illusory precision
*The availability of numerical scores from instruments designed as aids for skilled practitioners (projective techniques) may create misleading impression of quantification and objectivity
Full understanding and proper interpretation of test scores has both a past and future reference to specific real-life contexts

Antecedent Context:
*Understand individual's reactional biography and learning history.

*Environmental development?
*Response to environment?
*Conditions/Events?
Full understanding and proper interpretation of test scores has both a past and future reference to specific real-life contexts

Anticipated Context:
*Setting (educational, occupational, societal) in which this person is expected to function, in which they are being evaluated.

*Can this person read at required level for job she is considering?
*Can this youth manage own life in community?
*Is this child ready to benefit from a particular intervention?