• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/18

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

18 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
8 euro countries that colonized 125 countries
Belgium
Britain
France
Germany
Italy
Holland
Portugal
Spain
stability of relative levels of economic development
**positions have persisted for over 100 yrs

social development somewhat less stable
polarization of world economy
-richer countries growing richer, faster
-income gap btwn rich & poor countries steadily increasing
-relative position of countries w/i world economy stable
exceptions to stability of int'l rankings
Korea
Taiwan
(highly interventionist policies, development not driven by free market)
Latin America and stability of rankings
consistently poor in comparison with rest of world
stability of positions w/i LA as well
MAHONEY'S CENTRAL (GENERAL) QUESTION
Why are some countries more developed than others?
circumstances that create economic growth
-periods of exceptional growth rare, not often so sustained that they create upward mobility
-some movement from middle income to core
-strong state industrial policy, highly interventionist policies as in Korea, Taiwan, Japan
lack of mobility w/i world hierarchy
need to investigate relative level of development at their origin
quest for LEGACY OF COLONIALISM- what level of development did it implant
level of colonialism
level of implantation of metropolitan structures, institutions in the colony

*power of colonizer to transplant the civilization they represent to new environment
level of colonialism = product of...
interaction btwn:
1) type of colonizing power (merc/lib)
2) type of colonized society (complexity @ 1st contact)
problem with these 2-pronged scheme
ex- British colonialism in US, ppl who populated N & S parts of country very similar, but British established diff. colonial societies
N= industrial/suited to economic devel.
S= agricultural/plantation
higher levels of mercantile colonialism meant...
colonizers imposed restrictions on economic participation, granted exclusive rights to privileged merchants, coercive labor systems, ethnoracial stratification
mercantilist actors & the problems they pose
powerful coalitions of anti-market actors dependent on monopolistic privileges create roadblocks to later development once artificial colonial supports torn down
fate of indigenous populations under heavy mercantilist colonialism
systematic deprivation, long-run poverty
lower levels of mercantile colonialism meant...
neglect by colonizers
-absence of monopolistic merchants/landed classes
-indians more actively incorporated into society
The Great Reversal (in levels of ec. devel.)
pre-colonial territories that were most economically advanced (state-like societies) tended to become least economically developed postcolonial nations under BOTH mercantilist and liberal colonialism
*and vice versa, irrespective of colonizer
Mahoney's 2 periods of Spanish Colonialism
1. 1492-1700: Habsburg, mercantilism
2. 1700-1810: Bourbon, tendencies toward liberalism
problem w/ Mahoney's periodization
rise in Cuba's plantation economy happened in 19th cent. as Spain moved toward liberalism
-still using coercive labor