• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/9

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

9 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Laurel vs garcia

The chief executive has no authority to sell and withdraw it from public domain to make it alienable the roppongi property because it requires the legislative authority to allow the sale

Marcos vs manglapus

The president may bar the marcoses return to the philippines because he exercises greater discretion for preserving the welfare of the people and economy which the court could not argue against

Banda v. Ermita

Pres. Gloria removed exclusive jurisdiction of the national printing office over printing services requirements of government agencies



The president has the power to re-organize the offices in agencies in the executive department in line with the presidents constitutionally granted power of control over executive offices

Gonzales vs office of the president

The doctrine of implication is the power to appoint carries with it the power to remove.



The power of the president to remove a deputy ombudsman does not diminish the independence of the office of the ombudsman because the office of the ombudsman independence is political independence



The two restrictions over the power of removal of a deputy ombudsman:


1) removal must be same ground for removal of ombudsman


2) due process



Betrayal of public trust refer to acts which are just short of being criminal but constitute gross faithlessness against public trust, tyrannical abuse of power and negligence of duty, favoritism, and gross exercise of discretionary powers



The deputy ombudsman and a special prosecutor are not impeachable officers.

Funa v. Agra

Only time officials can hold multiple positions is when:


1) vice president appointed as member of cabinet


2) secretary of justice being ex officio member of the jbc



Acting secretary of justice concurrently with this position of acting solicitor general is prohibited



The prohibition against dual or multiple offices must be construed to apply to all appointments whether permanent or temporary to prevent the concentration of powers in the executive.

Almario v. Executive secretary

President arroyo disregarded the results of the screening and substituted her choice from the deliberation panels is not valid because this faithful execution clause is construed as an obligation and not as a separate grant of power

Pimentel v. Ermita

Limitations on executive power is construed against the legislature



Ad interim appointment are extended only during recess of congress and are submitted to the coa for confirmation whereas



appointments in an acting capacity are extended anytime there is a vacancy and is not submitted to the coa and are a way of temporary filling important offices

Lagman v. Medialdea

Constitutionality of proclamation of martial law in mindanao



The parameters for determining the sufficiency of factual basis:



1) actual rebellion


2) public safety requires it


3) probable cause for president to believe there is a rebellion



Probable cause is the most reasonable period to require him to satisfy a higher standard of proof would restrict the exercise of his emergency powers

Saguisag v. Ochoa

The president may enter into an executive agreement on foreign military bases to take necessary a proper steps to carry into execution of the law even if not expressly granted by the law