Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
45 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
- 3rd side (hint)
What are the 4 key aspects of critical thinking? |
•solve problems •calculate likelihood •weigh evidence •make decisions -also consider, reasoning, analyzing arguments, assessing assumptions, considering claims |
SCWM |
|
Argument: |
Connected series of statements intended to establish a point |
|
|
Reasoning: |
gives you the ability to reach a conclusion from one or more arguments |
|
|
Assessing assumptions: |
Things you take for granted that can limit your assumptions |
|
|
Be wary of claims that: |
•made by a party who stands to gain •do not have a clear source •anecdotal experience that the person Claims is the norm •bandwagon appeal •Mislead with statistics |
|
|
Straw man |
Fallacy. Overstate opponents argument to make it easier to attack |
|
|
Shifting burden of proof: |
Fallacy. Person making the statement forces the contender to provide evidence in the contrary |
|
|
False cause and effect |
Fallacy Attributing blame to unrelated cause (because of correlation) |
|
|
Personal attack |
Fallacy Off message. Attacks credentials of the individual |
|
|
Unwarranted assumptions |
Fallacy Taking too much for granted without evidence |
|
|
Emotional appeal |
Appealing to strong emotions to prove a point |
|
|
False authority |
Person who is presented as an authority, who is not |
|
|
Hasty conclusions |
Jump to a convenient solution |
|
|
Oversimplification/overgeneralization |
Simple solution to a complex problem |
|
|
Either/or thinking |
Taking extreme positions when other options are available. |
|
|
What are the 7 steps to problem solving? |
1. Define your problem 2. Brainstorm possible solutions 3 set criteria to evaluate each option 4. Evaluate each option using your criteria 5. Choose your best solution 6. Plan how you’re going to achieve the solution 7. Implement solution, evaluate results |
D, B, S, E, C, P, I |
|
decision making styles: Directive |
Prefer structure using practical data to make a decision -in the here and now |
|
|
decision making styles: Analytical |
Search data carefully, take time -often get hung up on over-analyzing |
|
|
decision making styles: conceptual |
Emphasize the big picture -adaptable, insightful, flexible. Tend to be called idealistic. Creative types |
|
|
decision making styles: behavioral |
Emphasize people, using feelings to assess the situation -have a difficult time making decisions that effect other people |
|
|
Metacognition: |
Thinking about how we think. -analyze strengths and weaknesses, coming up with better ways to do it |
|
|
Inductive arguments: |
Start from specific observations and go to general conclusions |
|
|
Deductive arguments: |
Start from broad generalizations and end in specific conclusions |
|
|
4 ways to become a more creative thinker |
1. Thought time- take opportunities to be creative. Mix ideas. 2. Play time. - have fun 3. Flex time-spend time doing things you are interested in. (Google employees spend 20% of time!) 4. Networking time-make connections with people who are different than you |
|
|
What does social exchange theory say about relationships? |
We seek interactions with people that provide a maximum reward for minimum cost |
|
|
3 criteria for evaluating relationships: |
Expectations, perceptions, investments |
|
|
Criterion Level (CL) |
What we believe we deserve based on past experiences |
|
|
Comparison level for Alternatives (CLalt) |
Outcome of leaving your current relationship for the best alternative |
|
|
Nature of CL &CLalt in a relationship |
They fluctuate! We start to expect more when we are in a happy relationship Sociocultural influences have raised our expectations |
|
|
Approach motivation: |
We pursue pleasure with the motivation to feel good |
|
|
Avoidance motivation |
We avoid undesirable experiences; motivation to reduce negative emotions like anxiety and sadness |
|
|
Precarious Relationship: |
Approach goals fulfilled, avoidance goals thwarted |
|
|
Boring Relationships |
Avoidance goals fulfilled, approach goals thwarted |
|
|
Flourishing relationship: |
Avoidance and approach goals are fulfilled |
|
|
Distressed relationships: |
Avoidance and approach goals are thwarted |
|
|
Attributions: |
Our explanation of events -we identify causes of events, and emphasize or minimize certain influences |
|
|
Attributions: internal/external influences |
Influences are internal (personality) or external (situation/circumstance) |
|
|
Attributions: stable vs unstable |
Stable is a lasting trait, or unstable is a temporary mood |
|
|
Attributions: controllable vs uncontrollable |
If we can manage it, it is controllable. If it is out of our hands it is uncontrollable |
|
|
Actor/observer effects: |
People generate different explanations for their own actions rather than similar actions done by other people |
|
|
Self-serving biases: |
Lead people to see themselves as responsible for the good that happens to them, and blameless for the bad. (In relationships it’s always the other persons fault!) |
|
|
Proportional Justice: |
Each partner gains benefits from the relationship that are proportional to their contributions |
|
|
Communal Relationships: |
Partners feel a special concern for others well-being and provide favors/support without expecting repayment |
|
|
Exchange relationships: |
People do favors for others expecting comparable benefits |
|
|
Equitable Relationships: |
Relationships that are nice, but also fair |
|