• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/45

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

45 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
  • 3rd side (hint)

What are the 4 key aspects of critical thinking?

•solve problems


•calculate likelihood


•weigh evidence


•make decisions


-also consider, reasoning, analyzing arguments, assessing assumptions, considering claims

SCWM

Argument:

Connected series of statements intended to establish a point

Reasoning:

gives you the ability to reach a conclusion from one or more arguments

Assessing assumptions:

Things you take for granted that can limit your assumptions

Be wary of claims that:

•made by a party who stands to gain


•do not have a clear source


•anecdotal experience that the person Claims is the norm


•bandwagon appeal


•Mislead with statistics

Straw man

Fallacy.


Overstate opponents argument to make it easier to attack

Shifting burden of proof:

Fallacy.


Person making the statement forces the contender to provide evidence in the contrary

False cause and effect

Fallacy


Attributing blame to unrelated cause (because of correlation)

Personal attack

Fallacy


Off message. Attacks credentials of the individual

Unwarranted assumptions

Fallacy


Taking too much for granted without evidence

Emotional appeal

Appealing to strong emotions to prove a point

False authority

Person who is presented as an authority, who is not

Hasty conclusions

Jump to a convenient solution

Oversimplification/overgeneralization

Simple solution to a complex problem

Either/or thinking

Taking extreme positions when other options are available.

What are the 7 steps to problem solving?

1. Define your problem


2. Brainstorm possible solutions


3 set criteria to evaluate each option


4. Evaluate each option using your criteria


5. Choose your best solution


6. Plan how you’re going to achieve the solution


7. Implement solution, evaluate results

D, B, S, E, C, P, I

decision making styles: Directive

Prefer structure using practical data to make a decision


-in the here and now

decision making styles: Analytical

Search data carefully, take time


-often get hung up on over-analyzing

decision making styles: conceptual

Emphasize the big picture


-adaptable, insightful, flexible. Tend to be called idealistic.


Creative types

decision making styles: behavioral

Emphasize people, using feelings to assess the situation


-have a difficult time making decisions that effect other people

Metacognition:

Thinking about how we think.


-analyze strengths and weaknesses, coming up with better ways to do it

Inductive arguments:

Start from specific observations and go to general conclusions

Deductive arguments:

Start from broad generalizations and end in specific conclusions

4 ways to become a more creative thinker

1. Thought time- take opportunities to be creative. Mix ideas.


2. Play time. - have fun


3. Flex time-spend time doing things you are interested in. (Google employees spend 20% of time!)


4. Networking time-make connections with people who are different than you

What does social exchange theory say about relationships?

We seek interactions with people that provide a maximum reward for minimum cost

3 criteria for evaluating relationships:

Expectations, perceptions, investments

Criterion Level (CL)

What we believe we deserve based on past experiences

Comparison level for Alternatives (CLalt)

Outcome of leaving your current relationship for the best alternative

Nature of CL &CLalt in a relationship

They fluctuate!


We start to expect more when we are in a happy relationship


Sociocultural influences have raised our expectations

Approach motivation:

We pursue pleasure with the motivation to feel good

Avoidance motivation

We avoid undesirable experiences; motivation to reduce negative emotions like anxiety and sadness

Precarious Relationship:

Approach goals fulfilled, avoidance goals thwarted

Boring Relationships

Avoidance goals fulfilled, approach goals thwarted

Flourishing relationship:

Avoidance and approach goals are fulfilled

Distressed relationships:

Avoidance and approach goals are thwarted

Attributions:

Our explanation of events


-we identify causes of events, and emphasize or minimize certain influences

Attributions: internal/external influences

Influences are internal (personality) or external (situation/circumstance)

Attributions: stable vs unstable

Stable is a lasting trait, or unstable is a temporary mood

Attributions: controllable vs uncontrollable

If we can manage it, it is controllable. If it is out of our hands it is uncontrollable

Actor/observer effects:

People generate different explanations for their own actions rather than similar actions done by other people

Self-serving biases:

Lead people to see themselves as responsible for the good that happens to them, and blameless for the bad.


(In relationships it’s always the other persons fault!)

Proportional Justice:

Each partner gains benefits from the relationship that are proportional to their contributions

Communal Relationships:

Partners feel a special concern for others well-being and provide favors/support without expecting repayment

Exchange relationships:

People do favors for others expecting comparable benefits

Equitable Relationships:

Relationships that are nice, but also fair