Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
38 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
- 3rd side (hint)
Reasons why employers should focus on the quality of health care
|
1. Errors
2. Utilization 3. Purchases 4. Relationships 5. Liability |
1. Errors - there are numerous errors in the delivery of health care services.
2. Utilization - there is substantial evidence of extensive overuse and underuse of various health care services. 3. Purchases - poor quality of care erodes the value of health care purchases. 4. Relationships - lack of attention to quality of care can have negative consequences in relationships with employees, providers and others in the community. 5. Liability - failure to exercise due diligence in evaluating quality of care may impact an employers liability for a bad outcome of care. |
|
Compents of quality care
|
1. Appropriateness
2. Excellence 3. Satisfaction |
1. Appropriateness - given the current state of the art of medicine
2. Excellence - in the execution of care 3. Patient satisfaction |
|
Considerations in assessing physician quality
|
1. ETC
2. malpractice 3. specialty 4. NCQA 5. MCO 6. communication |
1. ETC - assess the physician's experience, training, and professional certifications.
2. malpractice - review the physician's history of malpractice claims 3. specialty - for physicians performing specialty procedures, consider advanced training, experience with the procedure, complication and mortality rates, and success rates. 4. NCQA - the NCQA has developed some programs to recognize high-quality physicians 5. MCO - for physicians in managed care plans, review performance report cards provided by the MCO. 6. communication - schedule an office visit for evalutating the physician's communication skills. |
|
Considerations in assessing hospital quality
|
1. accreditations
2. JCAHO 3. satisfaction 4. AHA 5. Government 6. healthgrades.com 7. specific 8. teaching |
1. accreditations - the hospital should have the appropriate accreditations (from the state, CMS and JCAHO)
2. JCAHO - consider the results of JCAHO onsite surveys 3. satisfaction - review hospital satisfactions survey results 4. AHA - american hospital association information (on facilities, personnel and services) 5. Government - government data sources on hospital performance 6. healthgrades.com - review hospital quality ratings provided by healthgrades.com and the leag frog 7. specific - for specific procedures or conditions of interest, consider contacting the hospital directly regarding volume of admissions, complication and mortality rates, and success rates. 8. teaching - consider whether the hospital is a major teaching hospital (these have lower mortality rates for certain conditions) |
|
Considerations in assessing MCO quality
|
1. visit
2. state 3. CQP 4. NCQA - ECAP DS UD 5. JCAHO |
1. visit - consider performing a site visit
2. state - information may be available from the state dept of public health or the state dept of insurance 3. CQP - review MCO's credentialing criteria, quality assurance plan and preventive care programs 4. NCQA - ECAP DS UD - Accreditation by the NCQA - MCO will be categorized into one of the following: excellent, commendable, accredited, provisional, denied, suspended, under review, discretionary review 5. JCAHO - uses a similar approach to NCQA (with various categories) |
|
provider approaches for improving quality (referred to as supply management)
|
1. employers
2. guidelines 3. database 4. feedback 5. CQI |
1. employers - large employers can use quality care data to selectively contract with providers
2. guidelines - use care guidelines 3. database - use a hospital database to identify deficiencies in quality and monitor quality improvements 4. feedback - provide feedback on hospital and medical staff performance 5. CQI - promote continuous quality improvement plans |
|
consumer approaches for improving quality (referred to as demand management)
|
1. preventive
2. shared 3. disseminate 4. internet 5. tele-nurse 6. tele-DM |
1. preventive - provide preventive services
2. shared - use shared decision making programs to get the consumer involved 3. disseminate - disseminate information about provider quality 4. internet - encourage the use of reliable internet sources (ie US dept of health and human services) 5. tele-nurse - offer telephonic nurse counseling services 6. tele-DM - offer telephonic disease management programs |
|
primary sources of data for measuring health plan performance
|
1. claims
2. records 3. patient 4. population |
1. claims - claims and utilization data - the least costly sources of data and readily available electronically, but data quality depends on examiners and providers who may not have a financial incentive to record good data
2. records - medical records - an accurate source of data, but costly and only includes information on care provided by that provider 3. patient - patient reported data - can report on services from all providers, but responses can be influenced by the form of the survey, the question wording, and the responses available. 4. population - population exposure data - currently unreliable and incomplete |
|
factors that affect the credibility of health plan performance measurement reports
|
1. data
2. population 3. sample (size and selection) 4. yr2yr |
1. data - data quality
2. population - selction of the population - need to know how the data will be used and results will be interpreted 3. sample (size and selection) - sample size - should be based on the smallest grouping at which results are to be interpreted. formula for calculating the needed sample = n = (Z*sigma/p)^2. sample selection should be random or stratified. the sample is used to make inferences about the population. 4. yr2yr - year to year consistency of health plan results - high turnover in providers and members reduces the predictability of future results |
|
categories for health plan performance evaluation
|
1. access
2. financial 3. satisfaction 4. effectiveness |
1. access - measured as the actual treatment received, the opportunity to receive health care treatment (patient w/in X miles of provider), or the ratio of providers to members
2. financials - cost and financial meausres - annual cost per member, regional vs. national costs. dependent on demographics, health plan benefits, reimbursement methods, and reserves. 3. satisfaction - can use a standardized survey, enrollment/disenrollment rates, grievances, or voluntary out of network coverage. 4. effectiveness - medical effectiveness - multiple measures are needed (Separate list) |
|
common measures of medical effectiveness
|
1. preventive
2. guidelines 3. proxy 4. cost & utilization 5. outcomes |
1. preventive - preventive care measures - does the doctor follow standards for immunizations, memmorgrams, etc.?
2. guidelines - practice guidelines - to measure if the doctor's care is conservative and efficient based on published guidelines 3. proxy - proxy indicators - events that correlate with poor treatment (i.e. rate of low birth weight babies or heart attack rates for males over 40) 4. cost & utilization - such as admission rates and average length of stay (measures approrpriate use of resources) 5. outcomes - health status outcome measures - assessed by clinicians, patients, or mortality/morbidity rates |
|
definition and uses of health indicators
|
1. changes
2. level 3. safety 4. inform |
*health indicators = standardized summary measures that represent health status.
1. changes - monitor changes over time and variations across health regions 2. level - identify levels of health and well being of a population 3. safety - help address patient safety issues by encouraging those with poor scores to improve 4. inform - provide evidence to inform health programs, policies, and funding decisions |
|
definition and uses of comparative effectiveness research
|
1. persuade
2. disputes 3. errors 4. consistency |
*comparative effectiveness research = aa rigorous evaluation of the impact of different options available to treat a specific condition
1. persuade - persuade providers to move from one therapy to another 2. disputes - clarify disputes over practice and policy 3. errors - help in the physician/patient interaction to reduce errors 4. consistency - help make decisions more consistent |
|
uses of quality and efficiency measurements
|
1. quality
2. government 3. reporting 4. network 5. p4p 6. purchaser 7. prof standards & accreditation 8. education |
1. quality - quality improvement
2. government - government oversight 3. reporting - public reporting 4. network - network development 5. p4p - pay for performance programs 6. purchaser - purchaser decision making 7. prof standards & accreditation - professional standards and professional accreditiaiton 8. education - consumer health education |
|
institute of medicine definition of quality
|
SEE PET
|
1. safe - avoiding injuries to patients
2. effective - providing services based on scientific knowledge to all who could benefit, and refraining from providing services to those not likely to benefit 3. efficient - avoiding waste of equipment, supplies ideas and energy 4. patient centered - providing care that is respectful of and responsive to an individual patients preferences, needs and values 5. equitable - providing care that does not vary in quality because of personal characteristics 6. timely - reducing waits and sometimes harmful delays |
|
types of agents
|
1. general
2. sub 3. brokerage |
1. general - general agents - typically appointed by an insurer to be responsible for all business in a geographical area
2. sub - sub agents - hired by general agents to be the actual business producers 3. brokerage - a group of agents who are not affiliated with any particular insurer |
|
types of agent compensation
|
1. commision, % and flat
2. service 3. override |
1. commision, % and flat - percent of premium - rates vary by product, duration, persistency of the agent's buisiness, and the volume of business placed. flat commission per policy or per member - a movement toward this for inflation sensitive products.
2. service - service fees - sometimes paid to agents to compensate for services provided through the renewal process 3. override - commission override - this is an additional commission that is typically smaller than the commission itself, and is sometimes paid to general agents and brokerages. |
|
buyers of group insurance products and services
|
1. ERs - single & trust
2. gov. - EE & social 3. unions 4. discretionary 5. associations 6. creditors |
1. ERs - single & trust; single ERs - coverage may be purchased from an insurer, or the ER may self insure. multiple ER trusts - 2+ ERs join together to form a trust for the purpose of buying and funding group insurance.
2. gov. - EE & social; gov. EE group (FEHBA) and gov. social insurance programs (medicaid/care, social sec.) 3. unions - labor unions - labor union may be the policy holder or may negotiate on behalf of participating ERs 4. discretionary - discretionary groups - groups established primarily for the purpose of providing insurance or self-insured benefits (ie purchasing alliances) 5. associations - groups of individuals or institutions that share common professions, goals, interests or activities 6. creditors - creditor groups may purchase life or disability insurance on their debtors |
|
sellers of group insurance products
|
1. insurance
2. HMOs 3. provider 4. serivce 5. self "5 sell, 8 buy" |
1. insurance - insurance companies
2. HMOs - health maintenance organizations - these are licensed as separate entities, even though they are commonly owned by insurance companies, blue plans, and provider groups. 3. provider - provider owned organizations - consist of provider groups who accept a scheduled global capitation payment for providing specific services 4. serivce - health care service corporations - not for profit entities, such as blue plans and delta dental plans. 5. self - self insured employers - often contract out the administrative aspects of the plan |
|
components of the managed care delivery system
|
1. services
2. mix 3. network (capabilities and access) 4. managed (care and utilization) 5. quality 6. preventive 7. added 8. integrated |
1. services - consumer services
2. mix - product mix - full spectrum of plans along the managed care continuum 3. network (capabilities and access) - provider networks (access to physicians, hospitals, and specialists of consistent quality) and network capabilites 4. managed (care and utilization) - care management (for chronic diseases) and utilization management (reduces unnecessary services while maintaining high quality care) 5. quality - credentialing, utilization, and outcomes data for specific providers 6. preventive - preventative programs - disease prevention and wellness 7. added - value added products and services - such as 24 hour access to medical and wellness information 8. integrated - auxiliary services, mental and dental health, home care, etc. |
|
challenges facing MCOs
|
1. competition
2. consolidation 3. costs 4. quality 5. regulatory 6. sales 7. quality |
1. competition - meeting choice based competition - consumers frequently have a choice between 2+ MCOs
2. consolidation - consolidation into larger entities - to increase coverage areas and achieve economies of scale 3. costs - increasing medical costs 4. quality - achieving quality - plan quality (through NCQA accreditation) and provider quality (through credentialing, profiling) 5. regulatory - regulatory pressure - for increased consumer rights 6. sales - achieving strategic sales goals - is challenging because the marketplace is now more informed and competitive 7. internet - effectively using the internet - meeting HIPAA mandates and meeting demands of the EEs, EERs and providers |
|
key decision makers in the managed care distribution process
|
1. distribution
2. EEs 3. ERs 4. providers |
1. distribution - distribution channels (brokers, consultants, direct sales to large ERs, financial institutions)
2. EEs - separate list for their criteria 3. ERs - separate list for their criteria 4. providers |
|
MCO selection criteria for ERs
|
1. cost
2. quality 3. choice 4. service 5. network 6. HR 7. partner |
1. cost - cost and financial suitability
2. quality - assurance of quality care 3. choice - choice of plan design 4. service - quality of local service 5. network - network access 6. HR - compatibility with HR's objectives 7. partner - a strong partner in health coverage |
|
MCO selection criteria for EEs
|
1. cost
2. paperwork 3. choice 4. easy access 5. resource |
1. cost - low out of pocket cost
2. paperwork - little and easy paperwork 3. choice - choice of plans 4. easy access - easy access to quality care, services and information 5. resource - having a physician that is a resource |
|
the sales process for MCOs
|
1. opportunities
2. contact 3. needs 4. UW 5. prepare 6. present 7. close 8. consumer |
1. opportunities - target opportunities - identify potential new clients
2. contact - contact prospects - communicate the MCO's desire to establish a relationship 3. needs - identify the needs of the potential client 4. UW - underwrite the risk 5. prepare - prepare the proposal - try to leverage the MCO's competitive advantages 6. present - present the solution 7. close - close the account 8. consumer - consumer sale - the final sale is to the EE |
|
types of advertising media
|
1. TV
2. radio 3. print 4. outdoor 5. mail |
1. TV - can be effective when seeking to increase market share and establish the MCO's brand
2. radio - effective in select periods (like open enrollment), can reach a certain demographic, and is cost effective 3. print - publications - essential for consumer pre-enrollment and post-enrollment (less costly than TV) 4. outdoor - billboards - can target audiences based on location and is cost effective 5. mail - direct mail - address specific issues in a personal and creative way |
|
selection criteria for choosing the type of advertising media
|
1. goals
2. audience 3. budget 4. available 5. message 6. geographical |
1. goals - what is the goal? brand awareness or specific information?
2. audience - what is the target audience (EEs, ERs, providers) and which vehicle will best reach that audience? 3. budget - what is the available budget? 4. available - what vehicles are available? 5. message - which vehicle will best support the message? 6. geographical - which vehicles are strongest in the geographical area? |
|
recent trends in the managed care market affecting ERs
|
1. restructuring
2. competition 3. consumerism 4. cost 5. quality 6. emerging |
1. restructuring - physician formed specialty groups and direct contracting by ERs
2. competition - causes focus to be on quick fixes rather than long term solutions 3. consumerism - EEs are more informed about health care and want more control over product and delivery 4. cost - cost increases - caused by cost shifting, aging population, providers resisting discounts, and increased utilization 5. quality - movement toward defining and measuring it 6. emerging - emerging trends likely to affect ERs in the future = aging population, internet, reduction in health plan capital |
|
advantages and disadvantages of managed care interventions
|
A = efficiency, integration
D = anti, micro management, avoidance, variation, ratios |
A = efficiency, integration
--efficiency - greater efficiency in use of resources (less IP, more OP) --integration - better integration of prevention and treatment D = anti, micro management, avoidance, variation, ratios --anti-managed care sentiment --excessive micro management of providers --reduced provider to member ratios --wide variation in practice patterns --avoidance of sick patients and denial of care |
|
future trends in managed care
|
1. technology
2. consumerism 3. competition 4. uniformity 5. legislation |
1. technology - increases access to information and allows electronic transactions
2. consumerism - being driven by technology, aging population, and increased EE cost sharing 3. competition - will increase 4. uniformity - uniformity in medical practice - potential to become more systemized and evidence based 5. legislation - legislative changes - will affect health insurance market as a whole |
|
information needed in order to pay claims
|
1. identity
2. proof 3. date 4. amount 5. beneficiary 6. COB. |
1. identity - identity of policyholder and claimant to determine eligibility
2. proof - proof of loss/claim - according to the contract definition of loss 3. date - dat of loss - to determine that the claim occurred during the contract period 4. amount - amount of loss - according to the contract 5. beneficiary - beneficiary or assignee 6. COB - information regarding other coverage - for COB |
|
uses of claim information
|
1. pricing
2. reserving 3. reporting 4. adjudication 5. monitoring 6. fraud |
1. pricing
2. reserving 3. reporting - financial reporting 4. adjudication - claim adjudication 5. monitoring - provider monitoring 6. fraud - fraud and abuse control |
|
claim process for disability income
|
1. initial
2. status 3. plan 4. benefits 5. ongoing |
1. initial - initial determination of the potential liability (assess the claimants condition relative to the contractual definition of disability)
2. status - establish the disability status of the claimant - may involve an assessment by the claimant's physician, independent medical examination, or field investigations (surveillance) 3. plan - the insurer establishes a plan for managing the disability (timeline for recovery and rehabilitation) 4. benefits - determine the level periodic benefit payment - based on pre disability salary and offsetrs 5. ongoing - ongoing review of the disability to assure that payments are only made if claimants remains disabiled and to managed long term disabilities (consider lump sum payment or retraining) |
|
claim process for health insurance
|
1. proof and eligibilty
2. eligible 3. gross 4. net |
1. proof and eligibilty - benefit eligibility (consider the coverage limits, pre exisiting conditions, which expenses are eligible) and proof of loss (need bills with dates and illnesses to verify the loss)
2. eligible - determine eligible charges - usually the billed charges subject to usual and customary limits or a managed care schedule 3. gross - determine the gross benefit level - apply the ded., coins., OOP limit, and maximums (i.e. cost sharing) 4. net - determine the net payment - consider COB, subrogation and assignment of benefits |
|
componenets of the claim processing workflow
|
1. receipt
2. OCR 3. repair 4. auto 5. payment |
1. receipt - receipt processing - once it is received, the claim is logged into the system and given a unique identifier
2. OCR - paper claims are scanned and translated to electronic data using optical character recognition technology 3. repair - claims that do not contain all the necessary information are rejected and require manual intervention 4. auto - auto adjudication - if all the necessary fields are present, the system will adjudicate the claim automatically 5. payment - the payment process - some plans transmit funds electronically, while other send paper checks |
|
tools used for validating that a claimant is disabled
|
1. exam
2. surveillance 3. phone |
1. exam - examination by company physicians - the insurer my require that a physician of its choice examine the claimant, to validate the findings of the claimant's physician
2. surveillance - field examinations - a field investigator tries to discover if the claimant is performing tasks that he is supposedly unable to perform 3. phone - telephone validations - call the claimant and discuss the claim |
|
actions the insurer may take after evaluating a claim
|
1. accept
2. reject 3. more 4. rescind |
1. accept - claim is approved and payment is made
2. reject - claim is disapproved - the company will generally provide a reason for denial and the claimant will then have a chance to appeal 3. more - claim examiner requires more information in order to make a determination 4. rescind - contract is rescinded because of misrepresentation - this occurs when the insurer discovers intential misinformation on the application and when policy provisions allow for rescission |
|
types of medical management programs and activities
|
1. utilization
2. quality 3. disputes |
1. utilization - referral management programs, case management, pre admission/concurrent/retrospective review, utilization reporting and evaluation programs, provider incentive arrangement
2. quality - peer review, quality assurance and assessment programs, medical protocols and practice guidelines, provider selection and credentialing 3. disputes - such as member and provider grievance program |