Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
24 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
What is authentication
|
If the relevance of a writing is based on its source of authorship, a showing must be made that the writing is authentic.
|
|
What is foundation?
|
In the absence of a stipulation as to authenticity, a foundation must be made to have the evidence admitted.
|
|
What are the methods of Authentication?
|
1) Witness' personal knowledge
2) Proof of handwriting 3) Ancient Document Rule 4) Solicited Reply Doctrine |
|
What is the witness's personal knowledge?
|
The witness observed the writing
|
|
How can you prove handwriting?
|
1) lay person opinion
2) expert comparison opinion 3) Jury comparison |
|
What is lay person opinion?
|
Lay witness testifies to opinion that X wrote the document, based on familiartity with X's handwriting as result of experience
|
|
Expert Comparison Opinion
|
Handwriting Expert testifies to opinion that X wrote document on hasis of comparison between the document and genuine sample
|
|
Jury Comparison
|
Jury compares a sample and the original and decides
|
|
What is the ancient document rule?
|
Authenticity may be inferred IF document is:
- at least 20 years old - facially free of suspicion - found in a place of natural custody (with age comes reliability) |
|
What is the solicited reply doctrine?
|
A document can be authenticated by evidence that it was in response to a prior communcation to the alleged author
|
|
What is proof by circumstantial evidence?
|
evidence that illustrates distinctive characteristics
|
|
What is the conditional relevancy standard?
|
The document is admissible if the court determines there is sufficent evidence from which a reasonable juror could conclude the document is genuine
|
|
What is a self-authenticating document?
|
D document that is presumed to be authentic, therefore there is no need for foundation testimony
|
|
What are the types of self-authenticating documents?
|
NC TACO
- Newspapers/Periodicals - Certified copies of public/private records on file in a public office - Trade Inscriptions and labels - Acknowledged document - Commerical paper (ex. prmissory note) - Offical Publication |
|
How are photographs authenticated?
|
Witness may testify on the basis of personal knowledge that the photograph is a "fair and accurate representation" of the people or objects portrayes
|
|
What is the Best Evidence Rule?
|
A party who seeks to prove the contents of a writing must either:
produce the original writing OR provide an acceptable excsue for tis absence |
|
What is a writing?
|
sound recordings
x-rays films |
|
When does the Best Evidence Rule Apply?
|
When the party is seeking to prove the contents of a writing
Ex. (a deed or contract OR, W is testifying she learned of something from the writing) Usually it is a legally operative document |
|
What is a legally operative document?
|
The writing itself creates rights and obligations
|
|
When does the Best Evidence Rule not apply
|
When a witness with personal knowledge testifies to a fact that exists independently of a writing which records the fact
|
|
What is an original writing?
|
- whatever the parties intended to be the original - anything intended to be the original (comouter print out is ok)
- Duplicate (photocopies are ok) UNLESS, it would be unfair or there would be a genuine issue of authenticity - Handwritten copy ie neither an original nor duplicate |
|
What are excuses fof non-production of original?
|
- lost or cannot be found
- destroyed without bad faith - cannot be obtained with legal process |
|
What is the legal standard if an excuse it used?
|
Court must be persuaded by preponderance of the evidence that excuse has been established, secondary evidnece is then admissible
|
|
When will the judge cut the party a break even though the original is available?
|
1) If Voluminous (too much to bring into courtroom)
2) certified copies of public records (keep originals on file) 3) Collateral Documents (not very important to the merits of the case) |