Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
22 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Drug addict on a rehab scheme put on for him is not a worker
|
Bettray
|
|
Unpaid worker for a religious community if:
|
Steymann
– Contributes to economic activity of community – Receives benefit for his contribution, ie indirect |
|
A part time worker is still a worker, even if he supplements his income with state benefits or other lawful sources
|
Kempf
|
|
Part-time workers also count as long as:
|
Levin v Staatssecretaris
– “effective and genuine” – not on such a small scale as to be marginal and ancilliary |
|
Someone looking for work also comes under the scope of TFEU 45
|
Ex p Antonissen
|
|
A worker is a person who:
– Performs services for another person – Under the control of that other person – receives remuneration |
Lawrie Blum v land Baden Wurtttemburg
|
|
National law where nationality claimed decisive in deciding nationality
|
Micheletti
|
|
2004/38 Article 2 "family member"?
|
– Spouse
– Registered partner – Direct descendants who are under 21 or dependants, plus those of spouse/partner – Direct dependant relatives in the ascending line plus those of spouse/partner |
|
2004/38, 3(2) others with entry/residence right?
|
Other individuals with with entry/residence rights
– Other family members who are part of household or dependent on one with primary right – Partner with whom union member has a stable and durable relationship, duly attested |
|
RoR for > 3 months if
|
2004/38, article 7
– Worker/self-employed – Sufficient resources + sickness insurance – Students declaring sufficient resources and having sickness insurance – Non-union family member accompanying/joining a union citizen satisfying one of the above |
|
Where no kids, departure to home MS will mean non Union spouse will lose RoR in host MS (only persuasive in other jurisdictions)
|
Sandhu
|
|
Returning migrant workers can bring non-Union spouses with them
|
Surinder Singh
|
|
Senegalese woman married Frenchman and moved to Germany
– Don't have to leave if just separated – No need for spouse to live in same accommodation as worker |
Diatta
|
|
Social advantages could include “large family fare reduction card” and discrimination here is unlawful.
|
Cristini v SNCF
|
|
Direct discrimination can only be justified by TFEU treaty exceptions (very narrowly interpreted)
|
Commission v France
|
|
Past convictions only relevant if a present and serious threat
|
R v Bouchereu
|
|
Can base on association with groups if “socially harmful” (Scientologist)
|
Van Duyn
|
|
Previous convictions only OK insofar as showing reoffending
|
R v Bouchereu
|
|
Cannot use conduct not repressed against member states own nationals
|
Adouie and Cornuaille v Belgian State
|
|
"Public service" very narrowly defined
|
Commission v Belgium
|
|
Cassis approach for movement of people:
|
Bosman
Measures justified if they: – Pursue a legitimate aim compatible with the treaty and justified by pressing reasons of public interest. |
|
Proportionality for discrimination
|
Bosman
- ensure it achieves aim in question - No more than necessary |