Reading...
Play button
Play button
Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
32 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
|
THE LOVE OF WIDSOM
|
PHILOSOPHY
|
|
|
WHAT IS A PHILOSOPHERS ARGUEMENT
|
-A COURSE OF REASONING AIMED AT DEMONSTRATING THE TRUTH OF SOME CLAIM
|
|
|
TRIES TO PROVIDE REASONS FOR OR PROOF OF SOME VIEW
|
PHILOSOPHERS ARGUEMENT
|
|
|
IT IS AN ATTEMPT TO CONVINCE THROUGH RATIONAL DICUSSION
|
PHILOSOPHERS AGRUEMENT
|
|
|
HOW DO PHILOSOPHERS AGRUEMENTS START
|
THROUGH PREMISES OR ASSUMPTION
|
|
|
CLAIMS THAT ARE TO BE ACCEPTED BEFORE THE ARGUEMENT BEGINS
|
PREMISES OR ASSUMPTIONS
|
|
|
ARGUEMENTS END WITH
|
CONCLUSION
|
|
|
WHAT IS AN UNSUSSECCFULL ARGUEMENT
|
-FALSE
-INVALID |
|
|
MEANS THAT THE REASONING USED IS FALLACIOUS
|
INVALID
|
|
|
THE CONCLUSION DOES NOT FOLLOW FROM THE PREMISES OR ASSUMPTION
|
INVALID
|
|
|
THE CONCLUSION OF A SOUND ARGUEMENT IS
|
TRUE
|
|
|
ACTIVE OF EVALUATION IS CALLED
|
VALUE THEORY
|
|
|
AN ATTEMPT TO EXPLAIN WHAT WE ARE DOING WHEN WE MAKE EVALUATIVE JUDGMENTS
|
VALUE THEORY
|
|
|
JUDGING WHAT IS GOOD OR WHAT IS BAD
|
VALUE THEORY
|
|
|
CHARACTERISTCS OF ETHICAL VALUE
|
-SOCIALLY AND PERSONALLY IMPORTANT
-DELIBERATIVELY AUTHORITATIVE -UNIVERSALIZABLE -BASED ON REASON |
|
|
IT MUST HAVE A WEIGHTY IMPACT ON THE WELFARE OF THE PERSON ACTING AND ON THE WELFARE OF OTHERS
|
SOCIALLY AND PERSONALLY IMPORTANT
|
|
|
IT PLAY AND CRUCIAL AND PERHAPS DECISIVE ROLE IN OUR DECISION-MAKING PROCESS
|
DELIBERATIVELY AUTHORITATIVE
|
|
|
IT MUST IN SOME WAY APPLY TO RATIONAL BEINGS
|
UNIVERSALIZABLE
|
|
|
IT MUST RATIONALLY SUPPORTABLE
|
BASED ON REASON
|
|
|
EXAMPLES OF DEONTIC TERMS
|
-RIGHTNESS
-WRONGNESS |
|
|
DESCRIPTION OF HUMAN CONDUCT
|
DEONTIC THEORY
|
|
|
TYPES OF ETHICS
|
-DESCRIPTIVE ETHICS
-METAETHICS -NORMATIVE ETHICS |
|
|
THE STUDY OF ETHICAL BELIEFS THAT HAVE BEEN HELD BY DIFFERENT GROUPS OF PEOPLE IN DIFFERENT PLACES AND TIMES
|
DISCRIPTIVE ETHICS OR NON-NORMATIVE ETHICS
|
|
|
INVOLVES OBSERVATION OR FIELD RESEARCH
|
DISCRIPTIVE ETHICS OR NON-NORMATIVE ETHICS
|
|
|
THE STUDY OF GENERAL ETHICAL CONCEPTS
|
METAETHICS
|
|
|
ATTEMPTS TO EXPLAIN THE MEANING OF TERMS SUCH AS RIGHT AND WRONG, GOOD AND BAD
|
METAETHICS
|
|
|
CONSIST OF PARTICULAR JUDGMENTS ABOUT ACTIONS AND PEOPLE
|
NORMATIVE OR PRESCRIPTIVE ETHICS
|
|
|
ATTEMPTS TO PRESCRIBE COURSES OF ACTIONS OR WAYS OF LIVING
|
NORMATIVE OR PRESCRIPTIVE ETHICS
|
|
|
TO DETERMINE HOW ONE OUGHT TO CONDUCT ONESELF
|
NORMATIVE OR PRESCRIPTIVE ETHICS
|
|
|
BRANCHES OF NORMATIVE OR PRESCRIPTIVE ETHICS
|
-ETHICAL THEORY
-APPLIED ETHICS |
|
|
DEVELOPS ETHIC PRINCIPLES THAT APPLY THROUGHOUT ALL SITUATIONS
|
ETHICAL THEORY
|
|
|
FOCUSES ON PARTICULAR ETHICAL PROBLEM AREAS
|
APPLIED ETHICS
|
