Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
40 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Who is WD Ross?
|
was a Scottish philosopher, known for work in ethics. His best known work is The Right and the Good (1930), and he is perhaps best known for developing a pluralist, deontological form of intuitionist ethics in response to G.E. Moore's intuitionism. However, Ross also critically edited and translated a number of Aristotle's works, and wrote on Greek philosophy.
|
|
What is prima facia duties?
|
a fact presumed to be true unless it is disaproved.
|
|
List the 7 prima facia duties
|
1.fidelity2.reparation3.gratitude4.non-injury5.benefience6.self improvement7. justice
|
|
What is duty of fidelity
|
Duties of fidelity are duties to keep one�s promises and contracts and not to engage in deception. Ross describes them as "those resting on a promise or what may fairly be called an implicit promise, such as the implicit undertaking not to tell lies which seems to be implied in the act of entering into conversation . . . or of writing books that purport to be history and not fiction
|
|
what is duty of reparation
|
Reparation. This is a duty to make up for the injuries one has done to others. Ross describes this duty as "resting on a previous wrongful act"
|
|
what is duty of gratitude
|
Gratitude. The duty of gratitude is a duty to be grateful for benefactions done to oneself and if possible to show it by benefactions in return.
|
|
what is duty of non-injury
|
Non-injury. The duty of non-injury (also known as non-maleficence) is the duty not to harm others physically or psychologically: to avoid harming their health, security, intelligence, character, or happiness. It also includes a duty to prevent injury to others
|
|
what is duty of benefience
|
The duty to do good to others: to foster their health, security, wisdom, moral goodness, or happiness. This duty, says Ross, "rests upon the fact that there are other beings in the world whose condition we can make better in respect of virtue, or of intelligence, or of pleasure"
|
|
what is duty of self improvement
|
The duty of self-improvement is to act so as to promote one�s own good, i.e., one�s own health, security, wisdom, moral goodness, and happiness. Ross himself mentions "virtue" or "intelligence" in this connection
|
|
what is duty of justice
|
The duty of justice requires that one act in such a way that one distributes benefits and burdens fairly. Ross himself emphasizes the negative aspect of this duty: he says that this type of duty "rests on the fact or possibility of a distribution of pleasure or happiness (or the means thereto) that is not in accord with the merit of the persons concerned; in such cases there arises a duty to upset or prevent such a distribution" (146). Thus the duty of justice includes the duty, insofar as possible, to prevent an unjust distribution of benefits or burdens.
|
|
What is doctrine of double effect?
|
The doctrine (or principle) of double effect is often invoked to explain the permissibility of an action that causes a serious harm, such as the death of a human being, as a side effect of promoting some good end. It is claimed that sometimes it is permissible to cause such a harm as a side effect (or 'double effect') of bringing about a good result even though it would not be permissible to cause such a harm as a means to bringing about the same good end. This reasoning is summarized with the claim that sometimes it is permissible to bring about as a merely foreseen side effect a harmful event that it would be impermissible to bring about intentionally
|
|
what is an example of doctrine of double effect
|
A doctor who intends to hasten the death of a terminally ill patient by injecting a large dose of morphine would act impermissibly because he intends to bring about the patient's death. However, a doctor who intended to relieve the patient's pain with that same dose and merely foresaw the hastening of the patient's death would act permissibly
|
|
What is the golden rule?
|
1.one should treat others as one would treat self.
2.One should not treat others in a ways that one would like not be treated |
|
Who is joel feinberg
|
Joel Feinberg was an American political and social philosopher. He is known for his work in the fields of ethics, action theory, philosophy of law, and political philosophy as well as individual rights and the authority of the state
|
|
What is harm principle
|
holds actions of an individual should only be limited to prevent harm to other individual
|
|
what is offense principle
|
gives society the right to ban activities that are generally found offensive.
|
|
what is paternalism
|
refer to behavor by person,organization, or state which limits some persons liberty or autonomy for their good.
|
|
what is legal moralism
|
view that law can legitimately be use to prohibit behaviors that conflict society.
|
|
what is moral pluralism
|
is idea that there are several values which may be equally correct and fundamental and yet they are in conflict with each other
|
|
What is implied contract
|
a legally enforceable agreement that arises from conduct from assumed intentions from some relationship amoung imediate parties.
|
|
what is best interest principle
|
to provide guidance in deciding what options maybe reasonable considered as being the best interest of the patient
|
|
From the perspective of medical professionals the four main guiding ethicial principles derived from common morality are
|
benefience,nomalefience, justice, and automy
|
|
What is principle of justice within a biomedical context
|
refers to equal treatment of equal persons and fair allocations of resources.
|
|
what is business ethics
|
it examines ethicial principles and moral or ethicial problems that arise in business environment
|
|
what is fiduciary
|
a rise between trust and a beneficiary
|
|
what is retributive justice
|
punishment best response to crime
|
|
what is restorative justice
|
repair the harm they did
|
|
what is distributive justice
|
available quanities of goods
|
|
what is moral objectivism
|
contends to that moral judgements are objectively true or objectively false.
|
|
what is belmont report
|
attempts to summarized the basic ehtical principle identify by commission in the course of its deliberation
|
|
why was belmont report created
|
response to problems caused by tuskegee syphillis study. 400 disadvantage poorly educated blacks was used without consent or knowledge to study the course of a well known treatable disease.
|
|
what are kant's two form of ethics
|
consequentialism and deontology
|
|
what is consequentialism
|
based on actions. ends jusify the means
|
|
what is deontology
|
is where consequences of action doesnt really matter because moral judgement is contained in act alone
|
|
what is the 3 maxiums of kants categorical imperative
|
1. university2.ends to means3.king of means
|
|
what is university
|
all action must have this you can only do something if everyone else did it all the time
|
|
what is ends to means
|
every person should be treated with an ends to a means. you never allow to manipulate anyone
|
|
what is king of means
|
you should behave in a way like your a moral rolemodel
|
|
aristole identified things in 4 clauses
|
1.matter2.form3.source or effient cause4. final cause
|
|
What are the differences between epicurus and zeno
|
epicurus- hedonism, pleasure is good and desire is bad and death is end of both which is good.
zeno-stoicism, pleasure is virtue and bad was vice, view pleasure as bad because it is unrealistic exspectation |