Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
40 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
|
Jamieson What is the main problem with“management approaches” to environmental problems? |
They ignore ethical issue |
|
|
Jamieson · Why is our current value systeminadequate for dealing with the problem of climate change? |
o ClimateChange is too complex. There is no way to accurately assign economic values tothe alternative possible outcome of climate change. |
|
|
Jamieson What is a valuesystem? And how does a value systemchange? |
o Valuesystem: Specifies permission, norms, duties, and obligations; assigns blame,praise, and responsibility; it provides an account of what is valuable and whatis not. Generally a cultural construction rather than an individual one.
o “Weneed new values that reflect the interconnectedness of life on a dense, hightechnology planet.” o Needto focus on Character and virtues. § Humility, Courage, Moderation, andsimplicity. |
|
|
Gardiner · What 4 storms does Gardinerdiscuss? What are the main elements ofeach storm? |
o Theglobal storm 1. Dispersion of causes/effects ofCli 2. Fragmentation of agency a. Prisoner’s dilemma 3. Institutional inadequacies a. No global system to govern emissions o IntergenerationalStorm 1. Dispersion of causes/effects ofClimate change over the whole earth a. GHG’s will have long term effects inthe future b. Effects are lagged. Wont be felt forgenerations 2. Fragmentation of agency a. Neither individually nor collectivelyrational to be concerned with climate change. It does not effect the generationat all 3. Institutional inadequaciesa. No way to govern future generations atall. o TheoreticalStorm 1. Questions: a. How should we act now given uncertainfuture? b. What does equality between generationsrequire? c. Is the fact that our actions now willnot just have future effect, but affect who exists in the future, relevant tothe ethics of climate change? d. How should we treat animals and nonhuman nature? 2. All these questions are difficult. Wewill become overwhelmed and not be able to come up with a solution. o TheMoral Storm 1. Corrupted thinking a. Distraction, Complacency, Unreasonabledoubt, selective attention, delusion, pandering, false witness, hypocrisy. |
|
|
Gardiner Why is theintergenerational storm worse than the global storm? |
Intergenerational storm isneither individually or collectively rational. The effects of GHGs are not aconcern to individuals now but future generations will feel them and have nosay in the matter. |
|
|
Gardiner How might selectiveattention lead to moral corruption? |
o Byfocusing our attention selectively, we can be self-deceived or manipulated by others. § If we focus on uncertainty, we maymake inaction. If we focused on scientific views of the future we may takeaction. o We focus on the global storm instead of focusingon the future |
|
|
Light What is environmentalpragmatism? |
o Refersto an alternative approach of environmental ethics that focus on arguments thatdo not rely on arguments that nature has intrinsic values. |
|
|
Light · What moral elements have played a rolein climate negotiations? |
o Consensus and the idea of procedural justice (as opposed tosubstantive justice). The justice of the WAY an agreement comes about asopposed to the justice of WHAT is agreed to o Common but differentiated responsibilities (reflected by NAMA’s),as an appropriate way of adjusting responsibilities to a variety of factors(historical contribution, level of technological development, current andprojected future contribution) o Reciprocity o Economic Fairness o Well-being of human beings and non-human beings, as well as theirfuture generations |
|
|
Light · How were Bolivia’s objectionsovercome? What does this show about themoral value of consensus? |
o Boliviawas acknowledged but overturned. o Moral value: The recognition that while consensus is A value, andis not the only value. |
|
|
Muir Why does Muir think it waswrong to build the Hetch Hetchy Valley Dam? |
o Hadaesthetic value |
|
|
Muir · How does Muir respond to the idea thatthe dam was necessary for human needs? |
o Hetch Hetchy valley has sublime natural beauty, and this isnot to be sacrificed merely for small economic gains. o Waterand electricity can be gotten elsewhere |
|
|
Pitcher and Welchman · What 3 possible purposes ofenvironmental action do Pitcher and Welchman discuss? How do these purposes differ? |
o Reclamation § Establish equivalent use value.(To what time frame?) o Restoration § Return it to the conditionbefore it was damaged.
o Rewilding § Allow nature to overtake theland |
|
|
Pitcher & Welchman · Which of these purposes require there-introduction of original flora and fauna? |
o Restoration |
|
|
Pitcher & Welchman · What practical and theoreticalproblems do restoration projects face? |
o Practical: § Restock Known species § Recontour Land § Re-establish River’s original course § Traditional forms of hunting andgathering need to be reintroduced o Theoretical: § Think of it as restored, not as areplica or forgery § It would be a product of humans, notnature § Landscape was always changing, whichcondition is the original? |
|
|
Willot · What are some of the costs andbenefits of wetlands restoration? |
o Costs: § Opportunity cost: Agriculturalland § Land that is left as (or restoredto) a wetland, could be used for other purposes, e.g. for agriculture § Deadly diseases carried bymosquitoes that thrive in wetlands § Malaria § West Nile Virus § Zika o Benefits: Fresh water Introduce endangered species Greater biodiversity |
|
|
Does Willott opposeWetlands protection/restoration? |
o No,but she believes we need proper planning and funding to prevent mosquitoes fromgetting out of hand if we restore wetlands. |
|
|
Matthews What does Mathews mean by “living withnature”? And how is it opposed toArtifice? |
o Livingwith nature: § Let nature unfold in its ownway. § Let non-human nature unfold inits own way § Let our own selves develop inTHEIR OWN way § “Living with nature is not anattitude that encompasses ONLY our “external” relations, but also our“internal” and self-relation. § This attitude affirms the ideathat nature is a PROCESS, continually unfolding. o Artifice: § Opposite of Nature § What happens when beings capable forabstract thought intentionally intervene to change the course of events ofabstractly § Artifice is a regime of abrupt,wholesale change of things, the erasure of one environment and its replacementwith another environment. § Artifice typically occurs atthe instigation of agents in the grip of abstract ideas that they seek toactualize irrespective of context, (e.g. ideas like “development,” “progress,”“profit,” “gross domestic product”) |
|
|
Matthews · What is “inhabitation”? And how is this connected to living withnature? |
o Inhabitour current environment and maintain it, but don’t destroy things to rebuild. o Allowsnature to overtake our environment o By not radically changing these surroundings,we let them become inscribed with our history, so that we come to identify withthese surroundings. |
|
|
Matthews · How does living with nature opposecapitalism? |
o Consumerism– we embrace what we have, so we don’t want new stuff o Commodification - Value places and things for their meaningthat our own lives have invested in them. We can’t replace them o The idea that progress, efficiency, business, development, profit,automation, and property are all important justifying values. o LWN wants us to focus on having meaningful lives, with meaningfulrelationships, work, and connection to place. And so it opposes all thesevalues insofar as they contravene the possibility of this meaning. |
|
|
Matthews · How is the idea of an “inalienablelandscape” important for Mathews? |
o This means people will FIGHT for the place they call home. o This means people will oppose capitalist development insofar as itthreatens to undermine the significance of their home.
o This means that people will not be bought out |
|
|
Matthews · What kinds of change does living withnature oppose? What kinds of change doesit allow? |
o Opposesradical change that does not pay attention to context o Allowsgradual change that have nature in mind |
|
|
Matthews · What arguments for living with naturedoes Mathews entertain? |
o Panpsychic Argument: According to panpsychism, eachaspect of the biosphere has a capacity for self-realization; a telos that itcan achieve if not interfered with… Since panpsychism is the correct view ofnature, we ought to respect nature, i.e. let things exercise their capacity forself-realization. This is the idea embodied in the attitude of living with nature. o Meaningful life: We should adopt the attitudeof LWN because this is normally going to be necessary for human beings to livelives that they find meaningful. o Evolutionary Argument: If we don’t adopt LWN we areat risk of jeopardizing the survival of the human species. o Nature Knows Best Argument: Since nature knows best,we should follow nature, and not attempt to impose our ill-conceived abstract ideas on nature. |
|
|
Matthews How is living with nature “countermodern”as opposed to “modern” or “post-modern”? |
o Modernity is committed to the idea ofchange and the idea that, in itself, the world is just stuff – matter – with noinforming telos of its own. It is because the world is matter that it is OK toimpose anything we like – our Abstract ideas -- on the world. o Postmodernity challenges the meaningfulnessof the Abstract ideas appealed to by modernity, but doesn’t fundamentallychallenge the idea that the world is a blank slate upon which humans caninscribe what they want o Countermodernity RE-ENCHANTS the world. Theworld is alive; it has spirit. Each thing in the biosphere has a capacity forself-realization that ought to be respected. |
|
|
Krieger Are our concepts of“natural environment” and “wilderness” created or discovered? What implications does this have for Krieger? |
o Created by human beings (their values, standards, etc.) o In different cultural/historical context, different things willcount as “natural environments.” o “Wilderness” is an example of a “natural environment” within theAmerican cultural historical context. § In part this concept wasdeveloped as part of the Romantic movement in the arts. § In part this concept was aresponse of city dwellers to the perception that wildlands were decreasing innumber |
|
|
Kreiger · What makes a natural environment“rare” according to Krieger? |
o "Rarity” Krieger does not simply mean small in number. o ObjectsBecome rare when a large amount of people change their attitude toward them. o Someone must convince the public, there is something special aboutthat object |
|
|
Kreiger What is the purpose of theanalogy to art in Krieger’s argument? |
o Todemonstrate that as long as we get the same values from a forgery of a primeobject, why should it bug us if it is a fake? |
|
|
Kreiger · What is Krieger’s proposal forenvironmental policy? |
o We should manipulate peoples’ preferences/values about what canprovide a “natural experience” while simultaneously seeking to make “naturalexperiences” more accessible to people. o We should create artificial natural environments (!!!) thatprovide the possibility for the experience of nature o Create environments evocative of other historical times o Manipulate memory through the rewriting of history so that createdenvironments have new meaning o Create substitutes for certain environments through advertising o Simulate certain environments through “photographs, recordings,models, and perhaps even manipulations in the brain…” |
|
|
Krieger · How is Krieger’s view a compromisebetween “conservationism” and “preservationism”? |
o Heseesboth of these camps as ultimately promoting certain kinds of humaninterests/values... o The conservationists are right that the non-human environment isuseful for food/water/shelter/energy. o The preservationists are right that humans also have aestheticsensibilities that non-human environments have typically satisfied. |
|
|
Schmidtz · How does Schmidtz respond to the ideathat the original acquisition of property can’t be justified? |
o Property rights institutions are sometimes justified. o Property rights institutions can sometimes help maintain andprotect environmental goods § A’s property right to X = A’sright to use, sell, lend, bequeath, etc. X § A’s property right to X impliesduties for other persons, B, C, D, etc… Roughly: these other persons mustrespect my property rights. § A’s property right to X impliesA’s right to exclude others from X (from its use, etc.) |
|
|
Schmidtz · What is the purpose of property? How does it “internalize externalities”? |
o Each bears the costs of his/her action. Each reaps the benefits ofhis/her action.o Encourage socially beneficial behavior. They help prevent harmbetween persons, and encourage beneficial behavior. o They underwrite the social ideal of mutually advantageouscooperation. |
|
|
Schmidtz · Which types of property does Schmidtzdiscuss? |
o Private:§ Individual ownership§ Each hasa right to exclude others
o Communal: § Governmental agency typicallyacts on behalf of the public § A group excludes non-members from X, and permitsmembers to use X and contribute to the maintenance of X. § The enforcement of the communalrules can either be informal (custom) or formal (governmental). |
|
|
Schmidtz · What are some of the advantages ofprivate property? |
o Benefits: § Each has an incentive toprotect, maintain, and develop his/her share. § Monitoring relatively easy (onemust monitor only “border crossings”) § In the case of externalities,those effected can re-arrange their property rights (via trades) o Context of usefulness: § Small/medium scale events =events whose effects are NOT far flung, and so for which it is rather easy tosay who is responsible o Examples: § Labrador Peninsula indigenouspeoples with the advent of the European fur trade § Jamestown Colony after GovernorDale’s privatization order |
|
|
Schmidtz · What are some of the disadvantages ofcommon property? |
o Benefits: § Can provide insurance againstrisk (“Everyone is in it together” seems to be the idea behind the initialJamestown colony). § Useful for building publicworks § May sometimes be a better wayto handle large scale events = events are far flung and so hard to monitor whois responsible for what o Downside: § Monitoring can be harder thanprivate property § Free Riding and spite o Example: § Failure: Jamestown Colony BEFORE the privatization order. Starvation inthe streets. § Success: The Hutterites of the Canadian Prairie |
|
|
Schmidtz · Why did the Jamestown colonyfail? Why have the Hutterites succeeded? |
o Jamestown: § Every person in the Jamestowncommunity had equal shares to everything. § Large population § No one wanted to work while everyoneelse freeloaded o Hutterites: § Small population § Close-knit society § Communal dining § Individuals were reprimanded when theirperformance was subpar |
|
|
Rose · What two types of solution toenvironmental problems does Rose discuss? |
o Commandand Control o PropertyRights |
|
|
Rose · What is the pessimistic story aboutproperty? What is the optimistic story? |
o Pessimism: in the commons, environmentalresources/goods are overused and depleted (the tragedy of the commons).Property rights might solve this, but getting property rights regimes going inthe first place suffers from the same collective action problems. Everyoneprefers that a property rights regime exist, but it is rational for each to letothers to take the actions necessary to establish the regime. So the regimedoesn’t begin. o Optimism: While in theory the origin ofproperty regimes faces these problems, in actual fact property regimes DO startup. Why? It is true that starting a property regime involves costs. But whenresources become valuable enough, groups are often able to overcome collectiveaction problems and to institute property regimes… especially if these groupsare close-knit (linked by ties of religion, family, geography) and are able tomonitor one another. |
|
|
Rose · What are 5 problems for propertyregimes generally speaking? What is anexample of each problem? |
1. Potential Participants May Failto Agree on a Property Regime - Free riding 2. Property regimes may be ineffective orinconsistent - Legal pluralism: individuals my not know how to act and cause chaos 3. An Effective Property RegimeMay Revolve Around Purposes Incompatible With Environmental Protection. - Property rights for mining may be good for resources but not the environment 4. Methods for Defining PropertyMay Not Work Well For Environmental Resources - Difficult to assign air, water, and wildlife an any tangible way 5. Modern Property Regimes Tend toCreate Resource Monocultures, and These May Undermine Environmental Resources - wilderness is replaced with farms. loose biodiversity |
|
|
Rose · What would a “property” type solutionto climate change look like? How mightthe 5 problems arise in this case? Andwhich problems would be most serious? |
1. Failure to Agree a. Questions of distributionalfairness: b. US rejection of Kyoto Protocol c. What year should be thebaseline for required reductions? 2. Ineffective or Inconsistent a. Monitoring and Enforcementproblems b. Substitute performance is anadvantage of property regimes, but can be abused – emissions may not be offsetas promised. 3. An Effective Property RegimeMay Be Incompatible w. Environmental Protection a. Possible bad unintendedconsequences – e.g. if old growth forests DON’T count as offsets, and plantingnew trees does, there is an incentive to cut down the old growth forest, and soharm valuable environmental goods. 4. Methods for Defining Property maynot work well for environmental resources a. “Proxy slippage” b. Emissions of GHG a “proxy” forclimate change. But we can’t measure methane (a more damaging GHG) as well asCO2 emissions c. Should forests count asoffsets? Perhaps yes, but not all forests are created equal. Forests in coldregions that replace snow cover may exacerbate climate change. 5. Modern Property Regimes Tend ToCreate Monocultures a. Specialization may actuallyhelp AVOID monoculture if old growth forests come to count as GHG offsets.Countries that specialize in forests (preservation and creation) could create“hotspots”… for biodiversit |
|
|
Watson · What activities is Watson engaged in? |
o Violentdirect action § Sinking drift nets and cuttingdrift nets § Destroying net retrieval gear § Ramming/disabling whaling shipsSinking Whaling ships |
|
|
Watson · What arguments could be made tojustify his actions? |
o None. Even if Japanese whalers (etc.) are violating internationallaw, does Watson have the legal authority to enforce this law? No. Theinternational law Watson refers too are meant to be enforced by the statesparties against their own citizens. |
