• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/33

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

33 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
METAETHICAL VIEW THAT ALL ETHICAL VALUES ARE IDENTIFIED TO NATURAL PROPERTIES
NATURALISM
THINGS THAT CAN BE OBSEVERED AND MEASURED
NATURAL PROPERTIES
HOLDS THAT ETHICAL RIGHTNESS IS IDENTICAL TO THE MAXIMIZATION OF PLEASURE
NATURALISTIC THEORY
ALSO CALLED UTILITARIANISM
NATURALISTIC THEORY
CAN BE OBSEVERED AND MEASURED
NATURALISTIC THEORY
BELIEVE THAT ETHICAL PROPERTIES CANNOT BE REDUCED TO ANY OTHER TYPE OF PROPERTY
INTUITIONISM
BELIEVE THAT EHTICAL PROPERTIES HAVE A UNIQUE KIND OF EXISTENCE ONE THAT CANNOT BE GRASPED THROUGH THE FIVE SENSES AND CANNOT BE EXPLAINED BE SCIENCE
INTUITIONISM
THESES PHILOSHERS REJECT NATURALISM
INTUITIONISM
BELIEVE THAT AN ETHICAL JUDGMENT IS SIMPLY AN EXPRESSION OF AN EMOTION
EMOTIVISTS
DOES NOT DESCRIBE THE WORLD AT ALL
EMOTIVISTS
BELIEVE THAT THERE ARE NO ETHICAL PROPERTIES IN THE WORLD TO DESCRIBE IN THE FIRST PLACE
EMOTIVISTS
SAY THAT OUR ETHICAL JUDGMENTS HAVE NO TRUE VALUE (NIETHER TRUE NOR FALSE)
EMOTIVISTS
ETHICAL JUDGMENTS ARE THE MEANS WE HAVE FOR EXPRESSING CERTAIN ATTITUDES
EMOTIVISTS
EMOTIVISM HAS BEEN CALLED
BOO-HURRAH THEORY OF ETHICS
EMPHASIZE THAT ETHICAL JUDGMENTS PRESCRIBE COURSES OF ACTIONS
PRESCRIPTIVISTS
TELLS US WHAT THE JUDGER THINKS OUGHT TO BE
NOT WHAT IS
PRESCRIPTIVISTS
THEY DO NOT DESCRIBE STATES OF AFFAIRS IN THE WORLD
PRESCRIPTIVISTS
TYPE OF METAETHICAL THEORY
PRESCRIPTIVISTS
BELIEVE THAT ETHICAL VALUE DOES EXISTS AND THAT SOME OUR ETHICAL JUDGMENTS MAKE TRUE CLAIMS ABOUT IT
ETHICAL OR MORAL REALISTS
WHO ARE ETHICAL REALISTS
-NATURALISTS
-INTUITIONISTS
-CONGNITIVISTS
BELIEVE THAT ETHICAL JUDGMENTS INVOLVE THE ATTEMPT TO GAIN KNOWLEDGE ABOUT THE WORLD
COGNITIVISTS
BELIEVE THAT ETHICAL VALUE DOES NOT EXIST
ETHICAL OR MORAL ANTI-REALISTS
SAY THAT JUDGMENTS ARE NIETHER TRUE NOR FALSE
ETHICAL OR MORAL ANTI-REALISTS
TYPES OF ETHICAL OR MORAL ANIT-REALIST
-EMOTIVISTS
-PRESCRIPTIVISTS
-ERROR THEORIST
SAY THAT ETHICAL JUDGMENTS ARE SIMPLY WAYS OF VENTING EMOTIONS OT ISSUING COMMANDS
ETHICAL OR MORAL ANTI-REALIST
ARE NON-COGNITIVISTS
-EMOTIVISTS
-PRESCRIPTIVISTS
BELIEVE THAT ETHICAL JUDGMENT DOES NOT INVOLVE THE ATTEMPT TO GAIN KNOWLEDGE ABOUT THE WORLD
-EMOTIVISTS
-PRESCRIPTIVISTS
THINK THAT THE ENTIRE ACTIVITY OF ETHICAL JUDGMENT IS BUILT UPON THE ERRONEOUS BELIEF THAT ETHIAL VALUE EXISTS IN THE WORLD
-EMOTIVISTS
-PRESCRIPTIVISTS
WHO IS AN ERROR THEORISTS
JOHN MACKIE
JOHN MACKIE ARGUEMENTS
1- AGUEMENT FROM RELATIVITY
2-AGRUEMENT FROM QUEERNESS
PEOPLE THINK THIER ETHICAL JUDGMENTS ARE A RESPONSE TO REAL AND OBJECTIVE FEATURES OF THE WORLD, BUT THEY ARE WRONG
ARGUEMENT FROM RELATIVITY
ACCORDING TO WHICH PEOPLE ATTRIBUTE TO ETHICAL VALUES THAT IT IS HIGHLY IMPLAUSIBLE THAT SUCH VALUES ACTUALLY EXIST
AGRUEMENT FROM QUEERNESS
ETHICAL VALUES ARE INDEPENDENT FROM ONES SENTIMENTS AND MOTIVES
AGUEMENT FROM QUEERNESS