Reading...
Play button
Play button
Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
19 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
|
Gallenstein
|
Consideration furnished rule applies to joint property held by spouses obtained prior to 1977 (otherwise 50/50).
MA may not follow Gallenstein. |
|
|
United States v. Allen
293 F.2d 916 (1961) |
Full and adequate consideration to avoid 2035 (a) means an amount equal to what would be includable if no transfer were made
|
|
|
Silverman rule
|
In case of 3 year rule, if multiple people contribute to property, it is included pro rata between them.
|
|
|
Walton
|
Said that you could create zeroed out GRATs
|
|
|
Proctor
|
TTT
|
|
|
McCord v. Comm'r
120 T.C. 358 (2003) Appeal to 5th circuit |
You can allocate a gift of discounted FLP interests to charity based upon a defined value (i.e., a percentage based upon the value of the property as finally determined for gift tax purposes).
|
|
|
Atkinson v. Comm'r
115 T.C. 26 (2000) |
If a CRAT is included in the Grantor's estate because of a failure to make annuity payments, no charitable deduction is available.
|
|
|
United States v. Estate of Grace
395 U.S. 316 (1969) |
Reciprocal trust doctrine
|
|
|
Karmazin
|
TTT
|
|
|
Miller v. Comm'r
71 T.C.M. 1674 (1996) |
Provides guidelines as to how one distinguishes a loan from a gift
|
|
|
Estate of Rosen v. Comm'r
T.C. Memo 2006-115 |
TTT
|
|
|
Crane
|
TTT
|
|
|
Strangi II
T.C. Memo 2003-145 |
IRS included an FLP in a donor's estate on the basis of 2036 (a)(1), and PERHAPS 2036 (a)(2)
|
|
|
Kimbell v. United States
244 F. Supp. 2d 700 (2002) |
Bona fide sale exception of 2036 applies, because the decednet received a pro rata FLP interest and the transaction was not a sham or disguised gift
|
|
|
Estate of Bongard v. Comm'r
124 T.C. 95 (2005) |
LLC was upheld.
FLP failed. TTT |
|
|
Estate of Blount v. Comm'r
428 F.3d 1338 (2005) |
Disregarding expert's conclusion that a buy-sell method and result were comparable to other companies where conclusion ignored the nonoperating assets held by the business
|
|
|
Hackl
|
Gifted FLP interests needed to give a present interest to donees to benefit from annual exclusion.
|
|
|
Bosch
|
When state law has federal tax implications it must be resolved by highest court in state to be binding on IRS.
|
|
|
Wilson v. Bowers
57 F2d 682 (2d Cir. 1932) Lomb v. Sugden 82 F.2d 166 (2d Cir. 1936) |
Set forth 4 of the 6 requirements for the agreement price in a buy sell agreement to be respected by the IRS
|
