Eppp Tara School Intelligence

Front 1

Galton IQ

Back 1

intell is hereditary
distributed normally in population

Front 2

Spearman

Back 2

two factor theory
general -g
specific-s

Front 3

thurstone

Back 3

primary mental abilities
developed method of factor analysis

Front 4

guilford

Back 4

120 element matrix
divergent- generate new creative and different ideas
convergent -synthesize

Front 5

Cattell

Back 5

fluid and crystallized

Front 6

stats on heredity vs environment re IQ

Back 6

50% inherited
MS twins .88
Frat twins .53
siblinigs .49

Front 7

Zajon'c confluence model

Back 7

the more children the less resources and less intelligence

Front 8

Stanford binet

Back 8

two to adult
content areas
SAS standard age scores (as compared with IQ)
mental age/chronological age x 100
100 sd-16

Front 9

Wechsler
best measure of g for verbal and performance

Back 9

vocab and block design

Front 10

scatter analysis

Back 10

used in wechsler scales
15+ difference between verbal and performance
scatter is greater in pathology than normals
usefulness is limited at best
SB is better estimate for very gifted or severely retarded

Front 11

Gesell developmental schedule

Back 11

4 wks to age 6
motor, adaptive language, personal-social function
observations of activities not tests per se
good for neurological or organic disorder

Front 12

Bayley

Back 12

three scales- mental motor behavior
2-30 months
rating scale

Front 13

Denver developmental scale

Back 13

medical screening
developmental delays
infants and preschoolers

Front 14

Vineland

Back 14

assess personal and social sufficiency
birth to adult
adaptive behaviors
interview with others
communication, daily living skills, socialization, motor skills

Front 15

AAMD adaptive behavior scale

Back 15

3+

Front 16

adaptive behavior inventory for children

Back 16

english and spanish

Front 17

peabody picture vocabulary test

Back 17

point to word given a picture
good for expressive language disorders but normal hearing
2.5 thru adult

Front 18

columbia mental maturity scale

Back 18

good for sensorimotor disorder CP and with speaking reading problems

Front 19

hiskey nebraska test of learning aptitude

Back 19

deaf and hearing impaired
3-16

Front 20

leiter international performance scale

Back 20

2-18
reading speaking problems
match blocks
good for non english and autism

Front 21

Cattell culture fair intelligence test

Back 21

three different tests
no such thing as a culture free test
minority children do no better on these tests

Front 22

Raven's progressive matrices

Back 22

perceptual ability and spatial logic
considered a culture fair test

Front 23

SOMPA (system of multicultural pluralistic assessment

Back 23

six measures norms for different culture groups
estimated learning potential scale
5-11
(mercer and lewis 1977)

Front 24

Army alpha Army beta

Back 24

alpha for literate beta for nonliterate

Front 25

otis-lennon mental ability test

Back 25

group test for children

Front 26

otis self administered test
wonderlic personnel test

Back 26

used in personnel screening and selection in industrial settings

Front 27

aptitude vs achievement

Back 27

aptitude measures limited, defined homogenous grouops of abilities- used as PREDICTORS
achievement-measure end result of learning- assesses retention of content

Front 28

mental measurements yearbook M(MMY)

Back 28

Buros
critical reviews of tests
shows info on reliability and validity

Front 29

Test in print

Back 29

referneces to most tests published

Front 30

school psychology\head start

Back 30

associated with short term increases in iq and academic achievement and long terms benefits such as decreased placement in special ed classes and increased probabiliyt of graduating high school

Front 31

ability tracking

Back 31

involves group children on basis of ability level negative academic and psycholgical effect on low and modeate achievening children

Front 32

cooperative learning programs

Back 32

when properly designed are likely to have a positive effect on student achievement

Front 33

buckley ammendment

Back 33

parents and students have right to access school records

Front 34

larry p vs. riles case

Back 34

banned use of id tests as a criterion for placing children in educable mentally retarded classes

Front 35

three models of school consultation

Back 35

- mental health model /consultant interacts with consultee
-behavioral model-deals with teacher's style of teaching
-adlerian model- emphasizes preventative interventions by consultants who educate parents and teachers by applying assumptions and content of adlerian theory
targeting school environment rather students directly is more effective

Front 36

overcoming parental resistance (campbell)

Back 36

setting a positive tone
establishin empathy
defininf consultation as a collaboraitve effort
-clarifying parental expectations
-reframing the problem

Front 37

montessori

Back 37

cognitive development is product of interaction between individual and environment
-child is active learner

Front 38

head start

Back 38

increases iq and school achievement through early years but no effect in later years
more likely to graduate less likely to be delinquents

Front 39

bilingual education

Back 39

all english problems- 5-8 years to catch up
bilingual- 6 years