• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/36

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

36 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Why shoudl a clinician be concerned with disease etiology
1.prevention and
2. risk of disease
3. hunches
what is etiology of disease
cause of disease, so that exposure to a causative env factor can reduced or pathogenic chain leading to development can be interrupted
What is first step in underlying study designs
Whether there is an association btw factor or characteristic and the development of disease. Done by studying characteristics of individuals or both
What is second step in study designs
derive appropriate inferences regarding a possible causal relationship from patterns of association that have been found
WHAT IS A COHORT STUDY
comparison of two groups for incidence of disease with an EXPOSED AND UNEXPOSED group
what is expected if a positive association exists between exposure and disease
expect the proportion of EXPOSED who get disease would be > proportion of NONEXPOSED group in whom disease develops
what is incidence of disease in exposed group
a/a + b (disease in exposed/all exposed)
what is incidence of disease in non-exposed group
c/c + d (disease in non-exposed/all non-exposed)
what does incidence cases of disease show?
new cases where there is or is not a temporal relationship btw exposure and dz
Why must temporal relationship be established in disease?
in order to consider exposure a possible cause of the disease in ?.
What are two types of cohort studies?
observational and experimental(in randomized trials)
what is the "exposure" in randomized trials, usually
treatment or preventive measure
what is the essential characteristic in the design of cohort studies
comparing outcomes in an exposed group and in an nonexposed group
what are two basic ways to generate groups for cohort studies?
1. create study pop based on whether or not they were exposed.
2. select defined pops before any members become exposed or before exposures are identified.
Describe basis of Framingham study
select a pop on basis of some factor not related to exposure and take histories. separate pop into exposed and nonexposed groups
What is hallmark of cohort design
we compare exposed and non exposed persons.
What is major problem with cohort studies
Time of follow up is very long.
what is a prospective cohort study or concurrent cohort or longitudinal study?
identify group, watch for exposure, watch for result. They are concurrently followed until disease develops
What is problem with concurrent cohort studies
may take 20 years to complete
what is an alternative approach using cohort design?
RETROSPECTIVE COHORT OR HISTORICAL COHORT STUDY(also called a nonconcurrent prospective study)
How is time shortened in a RETROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY?
find historical data on group from the past so to telescope frame of calendar time for study and obtain results sooner.
What are differences in designs for prospective cohort and retrospective cohort studies
same! studying exposed vs non exposed. Only time changes.
Is it possible to conduct study that is combination of prospective and retrospective cohort?
Yes, exposure is ascertained from objective records in past and follow-up and measurement of outcome continue into future.
Describe Framingham study
1948, 30,000, ages 30-62, CHD, 20 year follow up, , sample size of 5000.
What was study hypothesis in Framingham study
incidence of CHD inc with age.
Hypertense develop CHD at >rate
Elev Chol leve > risk of CHD
tobacco > risk of CHD
Inc physical activity < risk CHD
>body wt predisposes to CHD
>CHD in diabetes mellitus
Which method did Framingham study use to select study population?
BASED ON LOCATION of Residence - pop observed for "exposure" then determined outcome of interest (CHD)
What can Cohort study based on defined population explore?
MANY EXPOSURES
What type of study was the Cowan study on late first pregnancy and breast cancer?
combination cohort study, because compared exposed vs nonexposed. Also a retrospective study because roster came from women treated earlier for infertility.
What kind of study is appealing for studying childhood diseases
long term cohort studies
What are four major questions regarding large cohort study of children?
1. what point should individuals in cohort first be identified?
2. should cohort be draw from one center or a few or national sample?
3. how long should a cohort be followed?
4. What hypotheses and many hypotheses should be tested in cohort (significance can change over time)
What are major biases in cohort studies?
1. Bias in assessment of outcome(assessing person may know of exposure, hypothesis tested, judgment may be biased by knowledge) Masking person making assessment can be addressed.
2. Information bias: if quality and extent of info obtained is diff for exp and nonexposed. Info has to be comparable in both exp and nonexposed.
3. Biases form nonresponse and losses to F/U.Exposed rates can be hard to interpret if losses occur.
4. Analytic bias: strong preconceptions by analyzers can be inferred.
When is a cohort study indicated on basis of information
when exposures are suspected as possible causes of disease and are worth investigating.
What does good evidence suggesting association of disease lead to
cohort study is indicated.
When is a cohort attractive to use for study
when we can minimize attrition - thus, when incidence of exposure and development of disease is a short time.(examp - rubella and congenital malformations)
What can make cohort design impractical?
When strong evidence does not exist to justify expense and large study. many dz occur at low rate, so very large cohort must be enrolled for valid analysis.
What is alternative to cohort study
case control study.