Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
36 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Why shoudl a clinician be concerned with disease etiology
|
1.prevention and
2. risk of disease 3. hunches |
|
what is etiology of disease
|
cause of disease, so that exposure to a causative env factor can reduced or pathogenic chain leading to development can be interrupted
|
|
What is first step in underlying study designs
|
Whether there is an association btw factor or characteristic and the development of disease. Done by studying characteristics of individuals or both
|
|
What is second step in study designs
|
derive appropriate inferences regarding a possible causal relationship from patterns of association that have been found
|
|
WHAT IS A COHORT STUDY
|
comparison of two groups for incidence of disease with an EXPOSED AND UNEXPOSED group
|
|
what is expected if a positive association exists between exposure and disease
|
expect the proportion of EXPOSED who get disease would be > proportion of NONEXPOSED group in whom disease develops
|
|
what is incidence of disease in exposed group
|
a/a + b (disease in exposed/all exposed)
|
|
what is incidence of disease in non-exposed group
|
c/c + d (disease in non-exposed/all non-exposed)
|
|
what does incidence cases of disease show?
|
new cases where there is or is not a temporal relationship btw exposure and dz
|
|
Why must temporal relationship be established in disease?
|
in order to consider exposure a possible cause of the disease in ?.
|
|
What are two types of cohort studies?
|
observational and experimental(in randomized trials)
|
|
what is the "exposure" in randomized trials, usually
|
treatment or preventive measure
|
|
what is the essential characteristic in the design of cohort studies
|
comparing outcomes in an exposed group and in an nonexposed group
|
|
what are two basic ways to generate groups for cohort studies?
|
1. create study pop based on whether or not they were exposed.
2. select defined pops before any members become exposed or before exposures are identified. |
|
Describe basis of Framingham study
|
select a pop on basis of some factor not related to exposure and take histories. separate pop into exposed and nonexposed groups
|
|
What is hallmark of cohort design
|
we compare exposed and non exposed persons.
|
|
What is major problem with cohort studies
|
Time of follow up is very long.
|
|
what is a prospective cohort study or concurrent cohort or longitudinal study?
|
identify group, watch for exposure, watch for result. They are concurrently followed until disease develops
|
|
What is problem with concurrent cohort studies
|
may take 20 years to complete
|
|
what is an alternative approach using cohort design?
|
RETROSPECTIVE COHORT OR HISTORICAL COHORT STUDY(also called a nonconcurrent prospective study)
|
|
How is time shortened in a RETROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY?
|
find historical data on group from the past so to telescope frame of calendar time for study and obtain results sooner.
|
|
What are differences in designs for prospective cohort and retrospective cohort studies
|
same! studying exposed vs non exposed. Only time changes.
|
|
Is it possible to conduct study that is combination of prospective and retrospective cohort?
|
Yes, exposure is ascertained from objective records in past and follow-up and measurement of outcome continue into future.
|
|
Describe Framingham study
|
1948, 30,000, ages 30-62, CHD, 20 year follow up, , sample size of 5000.
|
|
What was study hypothesis in Framingham study
|
incidence of CHD inc with age.
Hypertense develop CHD at >rate Elev Chol leve > risk of CHD tobacco > risk of CHD Inc physical activity < risk CHD >body wt predisposes to CHD >CHD in diabetes mellitus |
|
Which method did Framingham study use to select study population?
|
BASED ON LOCATION of Residence - pop observed for "exposure" then determined outcome of interest (CHD)
|
|
What can Cohort study based on defined population explore?
|
MANY EXPOSURES
|
|
What type of study was the Cowan study on late first pregnancy and breast cancer?
|
combination cohort study, because compared exposed vs nonexposed. Also a retrospective study because roster came from women treated earlier for infertility.
|
|
What kind of study is appealing for studying childhood diseases
|
long term cohort studies
|
|
What are four major questions regarding large cohort study of children?
|
1. what point should individuals in cohort first be identified?
2. should cohort be draw from one center or a few or national sample? 3. how long should a cohort be followed? 4. What hypotheses and many hypotheses should be tested in cohort (significance can change over time) |
|
What are major biases in cohort studies?
|
1. Bias in assessment of outcome(assessing person may know of exposure, hypothesis tested, judgment may be biased by knowledge) Masking person making assessment can be addressed.
2. Information bias: if quality and extent of info obtained is diff for exp and nonexposed. Info has to be comparable in both exp and nonexposed. 3. Biases form nonresponse and losses to F/U.Exposed rates can be hard to interpret if losses occur. 4. Analytic bias: strong preconceptions by analyzers can be inferred. |
|
When is a cohort study indicated on basis of information
|
when exposures are suspected as possible causes of disease and are worth investigating.
|
|
What does good evidence suggesting association of disease lead to
|
cohort study is indicated.
|
|
When is a cohort attractive to use for study
|
when we can minimize attrition - thus, when incidence of exposure and development of disease is a short time.(examp - rubella and congenital malformations)
|
|
What can make cohort design impractical?
|
When strong evidence does not exist to justify expense and large study. many dz occur at low rate, so very large cohort must be enrolled for valid analysis.
|
|
What is alternative to cohort study
|
case control study.
|