• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/27

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

27 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Environmental Views (fill in from slide)

Sustainability


Anthropocene



Economic View (fill in from slide)

sdf

How do we determine the total economic value of the environment?

Use Values + Non-use Values

Use Values

Resource that is directly or indirectly used. We benefit from it.



Direct Use Value Examples

Timber; Non-timber products; hiking; hunting

Indirect Use Value Examples

Soil erosion control; flood control protection; carbon storage

Non-Use Values:

Option Value; Bequest Value; Existence Value

Option Value Example

Future Recreation possibilities;


Potential pharmaceuticals

Bequest Value Example

Forest Available for future generations

Existence Value Example

Welfare from just knowing forest exists;


Polar bears;


Otters

Total non-market value =

Use Values + Non-use Values

Two Important Applications of Environmental Valuation

1. Measurement of costs associated with externalities




2. (fill in from slide)

Consumer Surplus

The difference between what one is willing to pay and what one actually has o pay or a service or a project

Two ways to determine consumer surplus:

1. Willingness-to-pay (WTP)


2. Willingness-to-accept (WTA)


- accept payment



Which is generally greater: Willingness to Pay or Willingness to Accept?

WTA > WTP




Because people are more willing to accept payment to do things or clean up/etc than to pay for the clean up.

Determining Direct Use Value with Market Valuation

Social benefits are determined by using the market value of environmental goods to assess impacts to producer and consumer surplus.

Cost of Illness

Monetize direct and indirect costs of illness related to environmental quality


Direct Costs:


- Medical Costs


- Lost Wages


Indirect Costs


- Decrease in human capital


- Pain and suffering


- Impacts to efficiency

Indirect Use Value: Replacement Costs

Ecosystem Services;


How much does it cost to replace these benefits?


-Labor and construction cots


- Water treatment plant


- Infrastructure to prevent floods and landslides

Direct Use and Revealed Preference: Travel Cost Method

Travel costs; Payment


Foregone Earnings; Give up $$ to pay


Travel Cost Method: Multiply by all visitors

Direct Use and Revealed Preference: Hedonic Pricing

Uses the difference in price between comparable goods to infer a WTP for a healthier environment, "ceteris paribus"

Non-use Value and Stated Preference: Contingent Valuation

Contingent Valuation: uses surveys t determine WTA (decrease in environmental quality) or WTP (for improvements in environmental quality). Provides a means for estimating non-use values (as well as use value)

Contingent Valuation and Lost Passive Use Example

Damages from the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill, 1989

Oil Pollution Act of 1990

Natural Resources Damage Assessment measures impacts in ecological terms such as the number of fish killed or acres of wetland destroyed

Sources of Error in Contingent Valuation

- Hypothetical Bias (hypothetical questions -> hypothetical responses)


- Protest Bids: Survey response is based on respondent's opposition o the question or payment video


- Free-riding: May lead to understantmet of WTP


- Strategic Bias: People might inflate their WTP to acheive greater cleanup if tey believe they will not have to pay.


- Embedding Bias: Answers are strongly affected by the context provided about the issue at stake (e.g. protection of a single national park vs protection for all national parks)

Ethical Issues in Contingent Valuation

- WTP might be affected by ability to pay


- Price is not an adequate reflection of our rights and responsibilities

Economic Approach: wage-risk studies

Take people in high-risk jobs and compare casualties and wages to the average person with an average job.

Problems with wage-risk studies

- Worker's knowledge of risks


- Do risky people choose risky jobs?


- Is the risk involuntary?


- Is all human life valued the same?