Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
5 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
|
Background |
Linguistic holistism, justification from people. He wants to abandon traditional philosophy as it doesn’t grasp the significance of LH, people have tried to revolutionise philosophy- he wants to attack those who are LH but revolution P instead of getting rid |
|
|
QUINE |
Chapter 5 Quine - only physics is most accurate Epistemology needs to be a chapter of psychology Knowledge should be descriptive not normative We can use naturalised epistemology for this - study Brain Wall - eye - brain - sentences |
|
|
RESPONSE TO QUINE |
Doesn’t address scepticism It doesn’t seem epistemological at all if give up on normativity ROrty - epistemology isn’t a worth while study Rorty again - it’s unstable - he’s mixed up causation and justification
|
|
|
Fodor |
Wittgenstein - pushes explain back, homoncular theory Fodor disagrees- use psychology to explain abstract ness Lillybelero |
|
|
Rorty responds to Fodor |
Need an abstract formula to know a tune, how do we get it in the first place? Rejects idea of abstract concrete distinction Abstractness tied to history of P A vs C is relative We can pick out some features and ignore others Psychology has no P significance |
