• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/11

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

11 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
sct bandura 1991
emotions regulate moral behaviour



people are more likely to refrain from antisocial behaviours to avoid negative asociated emotions




MD can allow them to cicumvent such emotions

roy keane and inge haaland (2001)
"he got his just rewards"



essentially suggests MD -aob allowing keane to injure haaland and feel no remorse




ptential EL




"i regret many things but he is not one of them"

guilt
affective negative state associated with tension and regret



essentially positive as serves reparative function




it shows good intention in a way- want to correct bad youve done




less likely to aggress




(has been neg related to antisocial .30 stanger 2013)

stanger 2013



does aob and guilt affect aggression?

exp group got scenario implying AoB, control group no obvious blame



measured aggress likelihood and anticipated guilt




*AOB GROUP MORE LIKELY TO AGGRESS AND LOWER GUILT




*GUILT MEDIATES RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN AOB AND AGGRESS

empathy



(eisenber and strayer 87)

affective self reaction



able to conprehend emotional state of someone else and essentially feel how they do




take perepctive and feel concern for those less fortunate

eisenberg 2006



empathy aggression guilt

HIGH EMPATHY PEOPLE = MORE RECEPTIVE TO OTHER'S THOUGHTS AND FEELINGS AND = LESS LIKELY TO AGGRESS



AND FEEL MORE GUILTY (MEDIATE?)



STANGER 2012



Does empathy alter emoshe reactions to agg?




does guilt mediate?

picture viewing

before _emp manipulation _ after


rating valence of injurious acts




Manipulation:


emp : try to take on thoughts and feelings of the victim, how its afffected them




no emp: remain detached try not to feel how they do




*High emp group rated pics as LESS PLEASANT, MORE UNPLEASANT after manip




*low emp still rated as unpleasant but less so




*high emp then less lkely to aggress and feel more guilty (antic)

IMPLICATIONS
enhancing empathy could reduce anti



enhancing antic guilt could too

kavussannu 2009



videotaped games

measured perspective taking and general empathy



observed behaviours




Males more pro and antisocial


BUT MORE REPORTED PROSOCIAL IN MEN COULD JUST BE LOTS OF EXTRA HIGH FIVES/HANDHSAKES which arent necessarily female behaviours and not exactly ood eg.s of pro




males more antisocial




*females more empathetic


COULD BE LESS EXPERIENCED PLAYERS?


MEN MORE EXPERIENCED AND YEARS OF COMPETITION SO MORE EGOCENTRIC?

KAVUSSANU 2009



ENDER CONC AND MEDIATION

GENDER LINKED TO ANTI



THROUGH EMPATHY




female = + empathy > - anti

o
k