Reading...
Play button
Play button
Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
65 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
|
Standardized
|
Same procedures as normed
|
|
|
Dynamic Assessment
|
Vygotsky. Deliberate deviation from standardized testing to determine if the examinee has the ability to profit from assistance or instruction.
|
|
|
Testing the Limits
|
Type of dynamic assessment that provides pt w/ clues/cues.
|
|
|
Domain-Referenced Testing
|
Interpreting a score in terms of how much he/she has mastered. Also called content or criterion-reference testing.
|
|
|
Actuarial (statistical) Predictions
|
Empirically-validated relationships b/t test results and criteria using regression.
More accurate than clinical predictions. |
|
|
Clinical Predictions
|
Clinical judgement
|
|
|
Spearman
|
G and S
|
|
|
Horn & Cattell
|
Crystallized and Fluid
|
|
|
Sternberg
|
"Successful intelligence" is the ability to adapt to, modify, and choose environments that accomplish one's goals and the goals of society.
Analytical Creative Practical |
|
|
Gardener
|
Multiple intelligences
1. Linguistic 2. Musical 3. Logical-mathematical 4. Spatial 5. Bodily-kinesthetic 6. Interpersonal 7. Intrapersonal 8. Naturalistic |
|
|
Heredity and IQ
|
The greater the genetic similarity, the higher the correlation b/t IQ scores
Id twins together = .85 Id twins apart = .67 Fraternal twins together = .58 Siblings together = .45 Siblings apart = .24 Bio parent & child together = .39 Bio parent & child apart = .22 Adoptive parent & child = .18 |
|
|
Heritability Estimate
|
.60-.80 or 32-64% of IQ is due to genetic factors.
Be careful, b/c this is group data. |
|
|
SES and IQ
|
.30
|
|
|
Flynn Effect
|
In industrialized countries.
3 pts/decade primarily due to better fluid Intelligence. Exhibits environmental influence. |
|
|
IQ Stability
|
.70-.90
Fluctuations due to environment have been noted (15 pts). |
|
|
Seattle Longitudinal Study
|
Cross-sectional design which showed early decline is open to confounds.
Only perceptual speed declines substantially prior to age 60. |
|
|
Age and IQ
|
Crystalized increased untial 60
Fluid peaks in adolescents to 20's |
|
|
Males IQ
|
Disproportionaltely represented in extreme high and low.
|
|
|
Slope bias
|
differntial validity for diff groups
|
|
|
Intercept bias
|
Predictor constantly under/over predicts performance
|
|
|
S-B
|
Ages 2 - 23-11
|
|
|
WAIS
|
Ages 16 - 89
|
|
|
V-P Discrepancy
|
12 pts is statistically significant
17 pts is recommended1 |
|
|
ADHD profile
|
VC > WM
PO > PS |
|
|
AD profile
|
VC > WM > PO > PS
|
|
|
Test-Retest on WAIS
|
Several weeks or months
2-3 pts on Verbal 9-10 pts on Performance 6-7 pts on FSIQ |
|
|
WISC
|
Ages 6 - 16
|
|
|
WPPSI
|
Ages 3 - 7
|
|
|
Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children
|
Visual in nature
More culture free |
|
|
CAS
|
PASS
Planning Attention Simultaneous Processing Sequential Processing |
|
|
Slosson
|
Screening device for children 2-8
|
|
|
Infant and Preschool Tests
|
Poor preditors of IQ
Focus on sensorimotor skills |
|
|
Denver Developmental Screening Test II
|
Birth to 6
Personal-social Fine motor Language Gross motor |
|
|
Bayley Scales of Infant Development II
|
Ages 1 - 42 months
Mental Motor Behavior |
|
|
Fagan Test of Intelligence
|
Ages 3 - 12 months
Time spent looking at pictures |
|
|
American Association of MR
|
IQ and Adaptive Functioning to meet MR criteria
|
|
|
Larry P vs Riles
|
Overrepresentation of A-A in SE due to biased IQ tests.
|
|
|
Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales
|
Ability to look after oneself
Communication Dailily Living Socialization Motor Function Birth to 18 |
|
|
AAMR Adaptive Behavior Scale
|
Personal self-sufficiency
Community self-sufficiency Personal-social responsibility Social adjustment Personal adjustment School Ed 3-21 Residential Ed 18-80 |
|
|
Columbia Mental Maturity Scale (CMMS)
|
Ages 3-10
General nonverbal reasoning SPEAKING & READING problems |
|
|
PPVT
|
Receptive vocab
|
|
|
Haptic Intelligence Scale
|
Designed for blind pts
16 + |
|
|
Hiskey-Nebraska Test of Learning Aptitude
|
Ages 3-17 w/ DEAF & HEARING IMPAIRED
|
|
|
Leiter International Performance Scale
|
Culture fair; READING or SPEAKING problems
Ages 2 - 21 |
|
|
Raven's
|
Ages 6 - 80
EXPRESSIVE problems, not hearing |
|
|
Kuhlman-Anderson Test
|
Group test
Less verbal Grades K - 12 |
|
|
Woodcock-Johnson
|
Cog ability
Achievement |
|
|
Wonderlic Personnel
|
May be unfair to minorities
|
|
|
Cirriculum-Based Measurement
|
Periodic assessment of school-aged children w/ standardized testing to evaluate current skills.
|
|
|
Performance-Based Assessment
|
The "centerpiece of Goals 2000" by Clinton.
Ability to carry out an activty (give a speech) |
|
|
Scholastic Assessment Test
|
500 "repositioned"
SAT total and gpa = .65 |
|
|
Multiple Aptitude Test Batteries
|
DAT
GATB |
|
|
Special Aptitide Tests
|
Low validity and high specificity
Psychomotor and Mechanical Tests |
|
|
MMPI Scales
|
1. Hypochondriasis
2. Depression 3. Hysteria 4. PD 5. M-F 6. Paranoia 7. Psychasthenia 8. Schizophrenia 9. Hypomania 10. Social Introversion |
|
|
L Scale
|
High = Free of issues/fake good
Low = possible exaggeration |
|
|
F Scale
|
High = Deliberate malingering/fake bad
Low = Social conformity Infrequency scale; elevated scores on this score (i.e., T scores above 65) can occur for a number of reasons, including "faking bad," confusion and disorientation, and cognitive deficits. Mildly to moderately elevated scores on the validity scales can be interpreted clinically; however, scores of about 90 or greater could indicate random responding and completely invalidate the test. |
|
|
K Correction
|
High = Defensiveness/Fake good
Low = Fake bad |
|
|
Edwards Personal Preference Schedule (EPPS)
|
Based on Murry's personality theory
15 Needs |
|
|
16 PF
|
Cattell
|
|
|
NEO PI
|
Big 5
Atheoretical lexical approach |
|
|
Illinois Test of Psycholinguistic Abilities (ITPA)
|
Ages 2 - 10
Input, processing, output Poor w/ culturaly diverse |
|
|
ADHD
|
SCAD on WAIS/WISC
|
|
|
Strong Interest
|
General Occ Theme based on Holland's six occ themes
Occ Scale Personal Style Scale Administrative Index |
|
|
Kuder Occupational Interest Survey
|
Criterion based
Occ Scales College Major Scales Vocational Interest Estimates Dependability Indicies |
|
|
Self-Directed Search
|
Holland
RIASEC |
