Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
52 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
"Reasons for Exit and Entry" in Long Run Competative Equilibrium
|
1. Change in demand
2. Change in costs |
|
"Necessary Conditions" for Long Run Competative Equilibrium
|
1. The market clears (Qs = Qd)
2. Profit = 0; normal; P = ATC |
|
CONSEQUENCES: Decrease in demand
|
1. D decreases
2. P and Q decrease 3. d = MR 4. q* decreases,; pi < 0 5. Exit ( S decreases) 6. Q falls and P returns to normal 7. d = MR returns to original 8. q* returns to original; pi = 0 |
|
CONSEQUENCES: Increase in costs
|
1. MC and ATC increase
2. q* decreases; pi < 0 3. Exit (S decreases) 4. Q falls and P rises 5. d = MR increases 6. q* increases; pi = 0 |
|
CONSEQUENCES: Decrease in costs
|
1. MC and ATC decrease
2. q* increases; pi > 0 3. Entry (S increases) 4. Q rises and P falls 5. d = MR decreases 6. q* decreases; pi = 0 |
|
CONSEQUENCES: Increase in demand
|
1. D increases
2. P and Q increases 3. d = MR increases 4. q* increases; pi > 0 5. Entry (S increases) 6. Q rises and P returns to original 7. d= MR returns to original 8. q* returns to original; pi = 0 |
|
Productive Efficiency
|
1. P = min ATC
2. Opportunity cost of resources is minimized 3. Output of all other goods is maximized |
|
Allocative Efficiency
|
1. P = MC
2. Everyone willing to pay at least MC will get the good 3. Social welfare is maximized |
|
Monopoly
|
a single seller in an industry
|
|
Monopoly Characteristics
|
1. Single seller
2. No close Substitutes 3. High barriers to entry |
|
MONOPOLY: Implication of "single seller"
|
Market D = firm d
|
|
MONOPOLY: Implication of "no close substitutes"
|
price maker
|
|
MONOPOLY: Implication of "high barriers to entry"
|
LR pi can be > 0
|
|
Price maker
|
producer that finds the profit-maximizing P/Q combination
|
|
MONOPOLY: Types of Barriers to Entry
|
1. Economies of scale (the more you produce the cheaper per unit)
2. Government-created barriers (patents and licenses) 3. Control of an Essential Resource (NFL, DeBeers diamonds) |
|
MONOPOLY: Profit Maximization
|
MR does NOT = D
-->when D is downward sloping, the producer must lower the price in order to increase output. Thus, MR < P |
|
MONOPOLY: Profit maximization relationship betwen MR and P
|
MR and P are the same initially, then MR falls twice as fast
|
|
MONOPOLY: MR and D comparison equations
|
D: P = a - bQ
MR = a -2bQ |
|
MONOPOLY: SR Profit maximization graph analysis
|
Find Q* where MR = MC --> continue to Demand curve to find P*
--> DUE to high barriers to entry: SR pi = LR pi |
|
Price discrimination
|
the practice of charging different groups of buyers different prices based on differences in Ed
|
|
3 conditions necessary for Price Discrimination
|
1. Same degree of market/monopoly power
2. Two or more groups of buyers with different elasticities 3. Prevention of resale |
|
Price Discrimination: ELASTIC (shallow slope)
|
1. lower price
2. more options 3. lower opportunity cost |
|
Price Discrimination: INELASTIC(steep slope)
|
1. higher price
2. fewer options 3. higher opportunity cost |
|
Cases AGAINST monopoly
|
1. contrived scarcity
2. deadweight loss |
|
Contrived scarcity
|
-case against monopoly-
making goods SEEM more scarce than they are. Qm < Qpc ; Pm > Ppc |
|
Case FOR monopoly
|
1. Technological advance- IF monopoly spends pi on reearch and development, then monopoly may create faster growth over time
|
|
Monopolistic Competition Characteristics
|
1. Many small buyers and sellers
2. No barriers to entry 3. Differentiated products (i.e coke and pepsi) |
|
Monopolistic Competition Characteristics
|
1. Many small buyers and sellers
2. No barriers to entry 3. Differentiated products (i.e coke and pepsi) |
|
MON. COMP. Implications of "many small buyers and sellers"
|
no individual can affect Pe or Qe
|
|
MON. COMP. Implications of "no barriers to entry'
|
LR pi = 0
|
|
MON. COMP. Implications of "differentiated products"
|
Advertising/price makers
|
|
MON. COMP. SR profit Maximization
|
negative profit is possible in the short run
|
|
MON. COMP. LR profit maximization
|
When pi > 0 in the SR, then in the LR:
1. Firms enter 2. D and MR fall 3. P* and Q* fall 4. pi = 0 |
|
Advertising
|
a seller's activites in communicating its message about its product to potential buyers.
|
|
Goals of Advertising
|
1. increase D
2. decrease Ed |
|
Positive effects of advertising
|
1. decreases search and information costs
2. facilitates the introduction of new products |
|
Conditions for advertising
|
many sellers = small demand
close subs = highly elastic demand |
|
Potential negative effects of advertising
|
1. May be persuasive rather than informative, designed to alter preferences
2. May establish brand-name loyalty; increasing monopoly power 3. Competing ads may cancel each other out, resulting in a waste of resources that does not alter demand |
|
Cases AGAINST Monopolistic Competition
|
1. P > MC - no allocative efficiency
2. Excess capacity- Q* is below output where ATC is minimized |
|
Case FOR Monopolistic Competition
|
1. Expanding consumer options through product variety adds the value by more fully matching consumer tastes
|
|
Oligopoly Characteristics
|
1. Few, mutually interdependent firms
2. high barriers to entry 3. Imperfect information |
|
OLIG. Implications of "few, mutually interdependent firms"
|
actions of 1 firm will affect the market
|
|
OLIG. Implications of "high barriers to entry"
|
LR pi can be > 0
|
|
OLIG. Implications of "imperfect information"
|
strategic cheating is possible
|
|
Collusion
|
cooperation among firms to raise each others' profit
|
|
Cartel
|
agreement among firms to restrict output to achieve monopoly power
|
|
Random Cartel Facts
|
1. Cartels are illegal in the U.S.
2. When all the members follow the rules, firms split monopoly profit 3. Cartels can increase profits to all firms regardless of product type |
|
Game Theory
|
2 players make 1 decision independently and at the same time; move of the other player is unknown
|
|
Prisoner's Dilemma
|
game in which the pay offs are such that the choice set that maximizes total welfare fails to maximize personal welfare
|
|
Maximum TOTAL welfare
|
highest sum of profits
|
|
Maximum INDIVIDUAL welfare
|
determine best choice in each scenario
|
|
Factors that BREAKDOWN collusion
|
1. Large # of sellers
2. differentiated products 3. differences in cost 4. antitrust policy |