• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/17

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

17 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

There are two factors that determine labor productivity:

(1) the quantity of capital per hour worked (K/L)


(2) the level of technology (A).

We can model aggregate output or real GDP (Y) as a function of three inputs:

1) labor, L


2) capital, K


3) technology (A):

Includes all types of skilled and unskilled labor basically “lumped” together.




Typically measured as aggregate hours or number of individuals employed.




Aggregate output (Y) is an increasing function of L.




If the other inputs, capital and technology, are held fixed then labor should exhibit diminishing returns.

Labor (L)

In some modern growth models, the notion of capital comes in two form

1) the usual physical capital


2) human capital

Almost anything that raises the amount of real GDP that can be produced with a given amount of labor and capital.

Technological Progress (A)


assuming that production exhibits constant returns to scale implies

if you double your capital and labor inputs, then you will double your output.

Growth Accounting Formula #1:

(1) A 1%-increase in L will result in a 2/3%-increase in Y; a 1%-increase in K will result in a 1/3%-increase in Y; a 1%-increase in A will result in a 1% increase in Y;

Growth Account Formula #2:

(2) Increases in labor (L) are twice as important as increase in capital (K). However, if labor is the only factor growing, then living standards will fall (output would grow slower than labor input).

Growth Account Formula #3:

(3) Since we can directly measure real GDP(Y), labor (L), and capital (K), we can back out an estimate for the rate of technological progress (A).

measures and tracks the productivity of individual inputs

Labor Productivity: Y/L


Capital Productivity: Y/K

highly correlated with living standards in free-market economies.

labor productivity

There is a theory that there will be an inverse relationship between the rate of growth and living standards (real GDP per capita).

a) To put it another way, poor countries should grow faster than wealthy countries.




b) When applied to countries around the world, this theory is often referred to as ‘Global Convergence”.




c) Since poor countries would be growing faster than rich countries, they would be ‘catching-up’ to the rich countries. Hence living standards would be converging.

two basic ideas behind global convergence:

1) Technology and information are difficult to control and hence move rapidly across borders.




2) There are diminishing returns to capital investment.

The effects of technology and information being difficult to control and rapidly moving across borders

Advanced education has already become completely international.




The reverse engineering of products is also commonplace.




Hence, over the long-run, production technologies are going to be similar.

The effects of diminishing returns to capital investm:

-When capital is scarce, the addition of capital will have a bigger impact on productivity compared to when capital is plentiful




- Hence, when capital is scarce, the rates of return on capital investment will be high and the capital stock will grow rapidly.




- Likewise, when capital is plentiful, the rates of return on capital investment will be lower, and the capital stock will grow slowly.




-Relatively poor country = lower capital per worker = higher rate of return to capital investment = more capital investment = faster productivity growth.

There is empirical evidence supporting global convergence both within the US as well as among the developed countries:

The inverse relationship between the growth rate of income per capita and the absolute level of income per capita is strong among the US states.




NOTE: There is NOT much convergence among developing countries

Several reasons for why we don’t see the global convergence among developing countries:

1) Lack of economic freedom and private property rights




2) Political instability




3) Low Rates of Saving and Investment




4) Poor Public Education and Health