• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/12

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

12 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

What is an easement?

Right to enter land

Profit a pendre?

Right to enter land and take stuff

Negative easement

Restrict how land is used

Easement appurtenant

Easements that benefit particular pieces of land

Easements in gross

Easements not tied to any particular piece of land

How to create an easement?

(1) Writing


(2) Estoppel


(3) Implied


(4) Necessity


(5) Prescription

What is a license?

Landowner's permission to enter property. Revocable.

Holbrook v. Taylor

Easement by estoppel. Rule: if landowner gives permission to to other and other reasonably relies, then court will step in and make license irrevocable because it would be unfair to allow revocation

Henry v. Dalton

Concern w. Fraud. Just get an easement, don't rely on doctrine of easement by estoppel. Argument against compensation b/c otherwise landowners won't want to give licenses in the first place.

Van Sandt v. Royster

Easement by implication. Lateral sewer through subdivided property. Requires: (1) prior use (2) unified ownership (3) severed parcel necessary, not sufficient. (4) one piece of land to benefit another




Necessity is important, depending on jurisdiction.

Othen v. Rosier

Rosiers own two tracts of landlocked land.


Easement by necessity: (1) Unity of ownership (2) Necessity (3) Necessity existed at time of severance of two estates


Prescriptive easement [same requirements for adverse possession]: (1) Open and notorious (2) Continuous (3) Exclusive (4) Adverse and claim of right

Brown v. Voss

P wants house to straddle parcel B&C. D puts obstructions in way of easement to limit easement. Trial court grants $1 in damages because (1) no increase in traffic (2) landlocked (3) impractical


Rule: Appurtenant easement for one parcel can't get you to other parcel