• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/13

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

13 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
steps of criminal justice process
-report of a crime
-pre-arrest investigation
-the arrest
-booking
-post-arrest investigation
-decision to charge
-filing the complaint
-first appearance
-prelimhearing
-grad jury review
-arraingment
-pretrial motion
-trial
barron v. mayor of baltimore
Bill of Rights only applies to the Federal Government
theories of due process clause
1.content is to be determined by other relevant amendments which originally were only for the federal government, but the 14th gave them to states

2.independent content apart from and in addition to the other amendments
brown v. mississippi
confessions now covered for the states
malloy v. hogan
self incrimination covered for the states
Schools of thought
1. ordered liberty
2. total incorporationists
3.ultraincorporationists
ordered liberty theory
cardozo-palko v.connecticut
-court must enforce fundamental rights on states whether they are in the bill of rights or not
-open-ended concept
-case by case basis
total incorporationists
-justic black
-only the first 8 amendments are covered
-close ended concept
ultraincorporationists
Griswald v. Connecticut
-first 8 amendments are automatically included, but it doesnt stop there
-minimum standard is the first 8
Palko v. Connecticut
-Double jeopardy
-originally sentanced to Murder 2, life in prison
-appeals, they overturn the conviction and order he be re-tried
-the supreme court argued that it was not double jeopardy and that the case against a defendant will be argued until it is error free
-32 years later overturned by benton v. maryland
Adamson v. California
-comment on failure to testify is permitted
-he didnt testify to avoid bringing up past convictions
-presumption of innocene he argued is shifted by the comments
-due process clause only forbids compulsion to testify by fear of hurt, torture or exhaustion
-purposew of due process is to prevent unfair conviction not help convicts be acquitted
-Affirmed
-Black argues..if you dont allow it in the federal courts, why now??
-later overturned by griffin v california
Duncan v. Lousiana
-denied trial by jury
-English law established jury precedent
-Justice Black--all rights should be given to states
-Decision reversed
Williams v. Florida
-he claimed his rights were violated by the alibi rule
-then claimed his 6th amendment right was violated because they would not grant him a 12 man jury
-they said that neither aspect affected his trial