Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
34 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
What did Schermerhorn (Children's influence on the marital relationship) investigate?
|
the authors tested hypotheses regarding children’s influence
on the marital relationship, examining relations between interparental discord and children’s negative emotional reactivity, agentic behavior, dysregulated behavior, and psychosocial adjustment. |
|
Schermerhorn discovered the following:
Consistent with theory, interparental discord related to _______________, which in turn related to ___________. |
Consistent with theory, interparental discord
related to children’s negative emotional reactivity, which in turn related to children’s agentic and dysregulated behavior. |
|
Schermerhorn discovered the following:
Agentic behavior related to _____ in interparental discord, whereas dysregulated behavior related to _____ in discord and _____ in children’s adjustment problems. |
Agentic behavior related to decreases in interparental discord,
whereas dysregulated behavior related to increases in discord and elevations in children’s adjustment problems. |
|
Schermerhorn discovered the following:
Agentic behavior related to decreases in interparental discord, whereas dysregulated behavior related to increases in discord and elevations in children’s adjustment problems. |
_________ behavior related to decreases in interparental discord,
whereas ______ behavior related to increases in discord and elevations in children’s adjustment problems. |
|
Schermerhorn discovered the following:
Person-oriented analyses of agentic and dysregulated responses indicated _________. |
distinct clusters of children linked with meaningful individual differences in marital and
psychosocial functioning |
|
In Schermerhorn study,
Results are discussed in terms of ________, such as increased parental awareness of children’s distress potentially leading to reduced marital conflict. |
Results are discussed in terms of possible mechanisms of child
effects, such as increased parental awareness of children’s distress potentially leading to reduced marital conflict. |
|
The following keywords are associated with the Schermerhorn study. Describe how each key word is associated with the study.
child agency, marital conflict, bidirectionality, psychosocial adjustment, reciprocal relations |
CHILD AGENCY (which I think is associated with agentic behavior) One such class of behavioral responses is children’s
mediation in interparental disputes, or agentic behavior. We define agency as children’s behaviors that are designed to influence family members (Cummings & Schermerhorn, 2003). Agentic behavior in the context of marital conflict is active helping behavior intended to diminish conflict. Agentic effects are more than bidirectional effects, requiring intentionality in the child’s behavior. MARITAL CONFLICT BIDIRECTIONALITY = Agentic effects are more than bidirectional effects, requiring intentionality in the child’s behavior. PSYCHOSOCIAL ADJUSTMENT: -The third aim of this study is to examine relations between children’s behavioral responses to marital discord and their adjustment -Effects on Psychosocial Adjustment Longitudinal analyses indicated that behavioral dysregulation was associated with increases in internalizing and externalizing problems, even controlling for initial levels of those variables, but adjustment did not predict subsequent behavioral dysregulation. These results support the interpretation that behavioral dysregulation in the context of marital discord may be a mechanism contributing to the development of behavior problems and is not simply a correlate of behavior problems. The fact that behavioral dysregulation predicted both types of problem behaviors suggests that a common process model may hold (e.g., EST), as opposed to distinct explanations accounting for internalizing and externalizing problems, respectively. RECIPROCAL RELATIONS: -Family systems theory provides a theoretical basis for the examination of reciprocal relations within families (Cox & Paley, 1997). Key principles of family systems theory (Cox & Paley, 1997; Minuchin, 1985) include the notion of the family system as an organized whole, with the parts of the system being interdependent. Systems consist of subsystems, and interactions within systems are characterized by a continuous cycle of action and reaction feeding back to produce further reaction. Family systems are characterized by both self-regulation, which enables them to stabilize interaction patterns, and self-reorganization, which enables them to adapt to the environment. Research suggests that children are not passive recipients of parenting, but rather, active participants in family relationships (Maccoby, 1984) -Reciprocal Effects Between Children and Marriage Emotional security theory (EST; Davies & Cummings, 1994) posits that exposure to marital discord increases children’s negative emotionality, reflecting emotional insecurity. Emotional insecurity, in turn, motivates children’s impulses to mediate, avoid, or in other ways reduce exposure to marital discord. Attempts to reduce exposure to discord indicate that the goal of preserving emotional security is activated, serving as a mechanism by which children maintain or achieve emotional security. The first two aims of the present article are to investigate reciprocity between the child and the marital system, including examination of both the influence of marital conflict on the child and child behavioral responses that influence marital functioning. One such class of behavioral responses is children’s mediation in interparental disputes, or agentic behavior. We define agency as children’s behaviors that are designed to influence family members (Cummings & Schermerhorn, 2003). Agentic behavior in the context of marital conflict is active helping behavior intended to diminish conflict. Agentic effects are more than bidirectional effects, requiring intentionality in the child’s behavior. Surprisingly few studies have examined children’s agency in the marital relationship. Schermerhorn, Cummings, and Davies (2005) examined perceived agency in the context of marital conflict, which reflects impulses to influence outcomes in the family. Marital discord predicted concurrent negative emotional reactivity, which in turn predicted concurrent perceived agency. Controlling for initial marital discord, perceived agency predicted reduced marital discord 1 year later. However, this study left unanswered the question of how children affect marital discord as a function of perceived agency. Agentic behavior provides more compelling bases to account for how children may influence marital conflict than the construct of perceived agency. Extending Schermerhorn et al.’s (2005) study of perceived agency, this report describes the first empirical study of children’s agentic behavior in the marital subsystem. Although it is sometimes suggested that children’s agentic behaviors are inevitably ineffectual at best, and at worst contribute to the intensity of marital disputes (Emery, 1989), EST suggests that children engage in these behaviors because they may serve by some means to reduce conflict between the parents, reducing children’s exposure to family threats. Another class of behavioral responses in the context of marital discord is children’s behavioral dysregulation (i.e., acts of verbal or physical aggression, misbehavior, or hurting oneself). The clinical literature has long indicated that marital discord relates to children’s behavior problems, including aggressive behavioral dysregulation (Emery, Weintraub, & Neale, 1982). Some have contended that behavioral dysregulation may also reflect a form of agentic behavior (i.e., “taking on the symptom,” Emery, 1982, p. 323) intended to distract parents from marital difficulties. Thus, children’s behavioral dysregulation may serve by some means to reduce marital discord over time. Alternatively, children’s dysregulation in the context of interparental hostility may escalate coercive family processes (Patterson, 1982), thereby promoting increased marital discord |
|
What is behavior dysregulation? (Schermerhorn)
|
behavioral dysregulation (i.e.,
acts of verbal or physical aggression, misbehavior, or hurting oneself). The clinical literature has long indicated that marital discord relates to children’s behavior problems, including aggressive behavioral dysregulation (Emery, Weintraub, & Neale, 1982). Some have contended that behavioral dysregulation may also reflect a form of agentic behavior (i.e., “taking on the symptom,” Emery, 1982, p. 323) intended to distract parents from marital difficulties. Thus, children’s behavioral dysregulation may serve by some means to reduce marital discord over time. Alternatively, children’s dysregulation in the context of interparental hostility may escalate coercive family processes (Patterson, 1982), thereby promoting increased marital discord |
|
What were the four goals of the Schermerhorn study?
|
In examining
children’s influence on marital functioning, the current study has several interrelated aims, the first of which is to test interparental discord as a predictor of children’s negative emotional reactivity and behavioral responses. Second, we examine links between children’s behavioral responses to marital conflict and later marital conflict. A third aim is to advance understanding of relations between children’s behavioral responses to marital conflict and their adjustment. Fourth, reflecting person-oriented analyses, we investigate individual differences in responding to marital discord (agentic behavior, dysregulated behavior), including implications for marital discord and child adjustment. Reflecting transactional processes in the family, child responses to marital discord may feed back to influence marital processes and ultimately affect the child. |
|
Briefly summarize the findings of the Schermerhorn study.
|
As hypothesized, we found that exposure to destructive
marital conflict was linked with children’s negative emotional reactivity, which was further linked with high levels of both agentic behavior and behavioral dysregulation. Agentic behavior and behavioral dysregulation had opposing associations with later marital discord, as agentic behavior related to low levels of subsequent discord and behavioral dysregulation related to high levels of subsequent discord. Whereas agentic behavior was not related to adjustment problems, behavioral dysregulation was related to increases in internalizing and externalizing problems over time. Distinct groups of low behavioral, agentic, and high behavioral children were identified and were associated with differences in negative emotional reactivity, adjustment, and subsequent marital conflict. |
|
In the Connell study:
In light of the selective focus on maternal (vs. paternal) psychopathology as a risk factor for child development, this meta-analysis examines the relative strength of the association between psychopathology in ____ versus ___ and the presence of ____ and ______ in children. |
In light of the selective focus on maternal (vs. paternal) psychopathology as a risk factor for child
development, this meta-analysis examines the relative strength of the association between psychopathology in mothers versus fathers and the presence of internalizing and externalizing disorders in children. |
|
In the Connell meta-analysis,
Associations were stronger between ____ than ___ psychopathology and the presence of ____ (but not ____) problems in children, with all average effect sizes being small in magnitude. |
Associations were stronger between maternal than paternal psychopathology and the presence of
internalizing (but not externalizing) problems in children, with all average effect sizes being small in magnitude. |
|
Relations were moderated by variables that highlight _____
between psychopathology in mothers versus fathers (e.g., age of children studied, type of parental psychopathology) and by variables related to ______ differences across studies (e.g., method of assessing psychopathology in parents and children, type of sample recruited, familial composition). |
Relations were moderated by variables that highlight theoretically relevant differences
between psychopathology in mothers versus fathers (e.g., age of children studied, type of parental psychopathology) and by variables related to methodological differences across studies (e.g., method of assessing psychopathology in parents and children, type of sample recruited, familial composition). |
|
In the connell article:
Though the principal goal of the present review is not to examine the __________ parental psychopathology might be associated with the presence of internalizing and externalizing problems in children, a consideration of ________ helps to form specific hypotheses about whether certain forms of psychopathology may be more or less strongly associated with child disturbance depending on the gender of the affected parent. |
Though the principal goal of the present review is not to examine
the mechanisms through which parental psychopathology might be associated with the presence of internalizing and externalizing problems in children, a consideration of the potential mechanisms of risk helps to form specific hypotheses about whether certain forms of psychopathology may be more or less strongly associated with child disturbance depending on the gender of the affected parent. |
|
In the connell article, 4 mechanisms for transmission of psychopathology are discussed. What are they?
|
Goodman and Gotlib (1999) proposed four
mechanisms through which maternal depression may be associated with maladaptive developmental outcomes for children, including (a) genetic transmission, (b) the development of dysfunctional neuroregulatory mechanisms (especially resulting from prenatal experiences associated with maternal psychopathology), (c) exposure to the mother’s maladaptive affect, behavior, and cognitions, and (d) contextual stressors associated with depression in mothers |
|
The Connell study was a meta-analysis. What does this mean?
|
Meta-analytic procedures allow researchers to estimate the population
effect size of the association between two variables and to search for theoretically or methodologically relevant variables that may moderate the strength of that effect. |
|
Summarize the findings associated with the Connell study.
|
The results of the study-level analyses indicate that externalizing
problems in children were equally related to the presence of psychopathology in mothers and fathers, whereas children’s internalizing problems were more closely related to the presence of psychopathology in mothers than in fathers. However, the magnitude of this difference was small. Furthermore, all of the population effect sizes were of small magnitude, although substantial variability in effect sizes was found in all of these analyses. In light of this variability in effect sizes, results from the moderator analyses qualify these overall conclusions in several important ways. Results of the construct-level moderator analyses indicate that some of the variability in the magnitude of results across studies is related to theoretically relevant differences between the manner in which maternal versus paternal psychopathology is related to the presence of internalizing and externalizing disorders in children. Theoretically relevant moderators include the mean age of children studied and the type of mental health problem in parents. Although theoretically based predictions regarding children’s gender and the year of study publication were posited, they were not supported and therefore are not discussed further. In addition to theoretically relevant differences between mothers and fathers, results of the moderator analyses also indicate that much of the difference in the magnitude of effect sizes across studies appears to be related to methodological differences across studies (rather than to differences between the effects of psychopathology in mothers vs. fathers per se), including the method of assessing mental health problems in parents and children, the type of sample recruited, and family composition. Although a methodologically based prediction regarding the influence of the biological status of parents was posited, it was not generally supported and is not discussed further. |
|
In the Connell study, the mean
age of children studied was found to be related to the magnitude of the association between psychopathology in mothers and fathers and the presence of internalizing and externalizing disorders in children. Discuss what this means. |
Foremost among the theoretically relevant findings, the mean
age of children studied was found to be related to the magnitude of the association between psychopathology in mothers and fathers and the presence of internalizing and externalizing disorders in children. It is notable that a striking difference in the direction of age effects was found for mothers and fathers, with paternal psychopathology (particularly alcoholism and depression) more closely related to emotional and behavior problems in samples examining older children, whereas maternal psychopathology (particularly depression) was more closely related to emotional and behavioral problems in samples examining younger children. Differences between the direction of age effects for mothers and fathers remained significant with the effects of potentially confounding moderator variables controlled. This pattern of results is generally consistent with our prediction stemming from findings that fathers are more involved in caring for older versus younger children (Bailey, 1994) and may indicate that psychopathology in fathers becomes more salient for children later in development. It may be that mothers are more exclusively important to children during early development because of their role as primary caretaker. Conversely, as caretaking is less often performed by fathers during this early period of development, paternal psychopathology may not have as much of an impact on young children’s social and emotional development but may become increasingly important as children mature and fathers become increasingly salient agents of socialization (Lamb, 1997).5 It is also important to consider the direction of influence in the associations between parental psychopathology and children’s behavior problems in relation to the contrasting pattern of age effects for mothers and fathers. Rather than simply reflecting the causal influence of parental psychopathology on the development of internalizing and externalizing disorders in children, it is likely that the association is bidirectional, as the presence of emotional and behavior problems in children may be a stressor for mothers and fathers, which may affect parents’ mental health. -A qualifier is that this pattern of age effects did not hold for the relation between maternal alcoholism and substance abuse and children’s externalizing problems, for which larger effects were found in samples of older children and adolescents. For this disorder, cumulative exposure may be a critical factor in explaining the larger effects for both maternal and paternal substance abuse and children’s externalizing (and for fathers, internalizing) behavior problems |
|
The connell study discovered that differences
in the strength of the association between fathers’ versus mothers’ psychopathology and internalizing or externalizing problems in children were found for two disorders in parents: depression and alcoholism/substance abuse. Discuss specifically what was discovered. |
A second finding related to theoretically relevant differences
between maternal and paternal psychopathology is that differences in the strength of the association between fathers’ versus mothers’ psychopathology and internalizing or externalizing problems in children were found for two disorders in parents. First, depression in mothers was found to be more closely related to children’s internalizing (but not externalizing) problems than depression in fathers. Such a difference is consistent with several mechanisms of transmission, including depression-related disruptions to the intrauterine environment during pregnancy and the greater effect of depression on maternal versus paternal parenting (e.g., Field et al., 1999). Second, alcoholism and substance abuse disorders in mothers were more closely related to externalizing (but not internalizing) problems in children than were such disorders in fathers. Although this finding is contrary to the prediction based on a genetic mechanism of transmission, which posited that paternal alcoholism would be more strongly linked to children’s (especially boys’) behavior problems, it is consistent with the adverse influence of maternal substance use during pregnancy on prenatal development. For both depression and substance abuse findings, however, the possible role of prenatal influences relating to maternal versus paternal effects remains tentative because most studies did not assess the presence of such disorders during pregnancy. This lack of information highlights the need for researchers to carefully assess parents mental health histories in order to understand the full picture of developmental influences on children. Furthermore, caution is warranted in interpreting the differences between maternal and paternal depression and substance use disorders because the magnitude of the differences were small and because differences for both parental disorders were not found for both internalizing and externalizing disorders in children |
|
The Connell study discovered 2 theoretically relevant finidngs. What were they?
|
1. the mean
age of children studied was found to be related to the magnitude of the association between psychopathology in mothers and fathers and the presence of internalizing and externalizing disorders in children. 2. A second finding related to theoretically relevant differences between maternal and paternal psychopathology is that differences in the strength of the association between fathers’ versus mothers’ psychopathology and internalizing or externalizing problems in children were found for two disorders in parents |
|
In the Connell study:
Other than these two sets of findings bearing on theoretically important differences between maternal and paternal psychopathology, most of the significant differences across groups of effects were related to methodological differences across studies, including the method of assessing mental health problems in parents and children, the type of sample recruited, and familial composition. Give some examples of the influence of these methodological factors. |
-At the broadest level, studies
relying on symptom ratings for parent or child mental health problems tended to find larger effects than studies relying on a diagnostically based categorical approach to assessment of parents or children. -Results tentatively suggest that research relying solely on spousal reports for diagnostic information on fathers may lead to diminished effects relative to studies using other assessment methods. -For studies that used symptom ratings to assess internalizing or externalizing problems in children, those that relied on parental reports tended to yield the largest effects -For externalizing disorders, studies relying directly on children’s reports yielded the largest effects. For internalizing diagnoses, similarly, studies collecting diagnostic information directly from children yielded larger effects than studies relying on parent report or medical records, although such effects were not larger than those from studies combining information from multiple informants -Another methodological factor related to differences in the magnitude of effects across studies was the type of sample used by researchers. For externalizing problems (but not for internalizing problems), the difference between parent clinical and child clinical samples was significant when the effects of other moderators was controlled. |
|
It is noteworthy that the pattern of
results for the source of diagnostic information on children differed somewhat from the pattern of results found for the source of symptom ratings for children in what way? |
studies collecting diagnostic
information directly from children yielded results that were among the largest, whereas studies relying on children’s self-reports on symptom-based questionnaires yielded effects that were among the smallest. It may be that children are able to provide more complete and reliable information about their problems in the context of a sensitive, probing interview than they are able to provide in response to questionnaires. As for symptom-based studies, however, differences in the magnitude of effects across each informant for children’s diagnoses highlight the need to collect information from multiple informants to provide a more complete assessment of children’s functioning. |
|
What did Connell discover about the effects of family composition?
|
Although
we had predicted that the effects of family composition on the magnitude of effects would differ for mothers and fathers, this PATERNAL VERSUS MATERNAL PSYCHOPATHOLOGY 763 hypothesis was not supported. Rather, results for mothers and fathers generally indicate that samples composed mostly of singleparent families yielded effects that were not significantly different from those samples composed entirely of intact families, and both yielded effects that were larger than samples in the middle range of family composition, although analyses for fathers were limited by the small number of studies using predominantly single-parent families. |
|
In Kane:
Research on parental depression is beginning to recognize the importance of studying fathers in relation to maladaptive outcomes in their offspring. Paternal depression is hypothesized to_________ AND to ______. |
Research on parental depression is beginning to recognize the importance of studying fathers in relation to
maladaptive outcomes in their offspring. Paternal depression is hypothesized to correlate with internalizing and externalizing psychopathology in children and adolescents and to compromise adaptive parent–child relationships (e.g., increased conflict). |
|
In Kane:
In the present paper, meta-analytic procedures were applied to this literature to address what? |
1.the magnitude and direction of covariation between paternal depression and children’s functioning.
2.In addition, we tested whether variation in findings could be accounted for by study characteristics. |
|
In KANE:
What did results indicate? |
Results indicated that paternal
depression was significantly related to offspring internalizing and externalizing psychopathology and father–child conflict. Larger effects for internalizing symptoms were associated with the use of community samples and symptom rating scales of internalizing problems |
|
Briefly summarize the findings associated with the KANE study
|
In summary, the significant effect sizes found in the present review are particularly compelling given
the lack of research on samples of depressed fathers. The majority of studies were not designed to assess paternal depression and its correlates, but instead were developed to measure correlates of maternal depression or child psychopathology in community and clinical samples. Additional research on clinical samples of depressed fathers may further document parent and child functioning at clinically significant levels. |
|
MIGHT WANT TO REVIEW THE KANE, KITZMAN, AND PILOWSKY ARTICLES MORE CLOSELY FOR EXTRA DETAILS.
|
MIGHT WANT TO REVIEW THE KANE, KITZMAN, AND PILOWSKY ARTICLES MORE CLOSELY FOR EXTRA DETAILS.
|
|
In Kitzman:
In the current meta-analysis, two pieces of evidence suggest that the effects of witnessing interparental violence may be even greater than the effects of witnessing other forms of destructive conflict. What are these two pieces of evidence? |
First, studies comparing children witnesses and nonwitnesses
produced a larger average study-level effect size, d –0.40, than those reported by Buehler et al. (1997) and Reid and Crisafulli (1990). However, average study-level effect sizes were calculated differently in these three meta-analyses and so cannot be directly compared. Therefore the second piece of evidence may be more relevant. Our meta-analysis included a small number of studies that directly compared children who witnessed interparental violence and children who witnessed only parents’ verbal aggression. Effect sizes from these studies suggest that children who witness interparental violence show significantly worse outcomes than those who witness interparental violence show significantly worse outcomes than those who witness other forms of destructive interparental conflict, d –0.28. |
|
Briefly describe the Kitzman study.
|
This meta-analysis examined 118 studies of the psychosocial outcomes of children exposed to interparental
violence. Correlational studies showed a significant association between exposure and child problems (d 0.29). Group comparison studies showed that witnesses had significantly worse outcomes relative to nonwitnesses (d 0.40) and children from verbally aggressive homes (d 0.28), but witnesses’ outcomes were not significantly different from those of physically abused children (d 0.15) or physically abused witnesses (d 0.13). Several methodological variables moderated these results. Similar effects were found across a range of outcomes, with slight evidence for greater risk among preschoolers. |
|
What was the objective of the pilowsky study?
|
To determine the independent effects of parental depression and family discord on offspring psychopathology among children at high and low risk of depression
|
|
What was the method of the Pilowsky study
|
Family discord factors were assessed when subjects were 17 yrs old, and offspring diagnoses were assessed about 20 yrs later (by interviewer blind to cond't). The following dimensions of family discord were assessed: poor marital adjustment, parent child discord, low family cohesion, affectionless control (low care-high protection), and parental divorce.
|
|
What were the results associated with the Pilowsky study?
|
Most family discord factors were associated with parental depression. Among children of depressed parents, none of the measures of famil discord had a statistically significant association with offspring major depressive disorder or anxiety disorders. Among children of nondepressed parents, parental affectionless control was associated with an almost fivefold increased risk of major depressive disorder and with more than a 14 fold increased risk of substance use disorders.
|
|
What were the conclusions associated with the Pilowsky study?
|
Parental depression is associated with family discord and is a consistent risk factor for offspring major depressive disorder and anxiety disorders, as shown over a 20 yr follow up of offspring of depressed and nondepressed parents. Family discord factors may be a risk factor for major depressive disorder and substance use disorders in offspring of nondepressed parents.
|