Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
23 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Reflexes at birth
|
curling toes when sole of foot touched, palmar grasp, rooting, sucking, breathing
|
|
Tests of abnormality - Moro Reflex
|
when head allowed to drop, arms spread out then retract; baby usually cries, disappears in 4th-6th month after birth; persistence = malfunctioning CNS or other brainstem problems; mental retardation
|
|
Tests of abnormality - Babinski Reflex
|
toes curl outward like a fan when sole of foot stroked; present from birth to 12-18 months - absent in babies with lower spinal cord defects
|
|
Studying early cognition - look at
|
heart rate; habituation; preferential looking
|
|
Heart rate decelerates in response to ____________________
|
Novel/attractive stimuli , Interesting but non-exciting
|
|
Heart rate accelerates in response to ______________________
|
Potentially dangerous or aversive stimuli; But need to be awake and alert - Caution re age differences and arousal
|
|
Preferental looking - Can the infant discriminate between two similar visual stimuli?
|
Looking time measured to both stimuli - Longer looking to one = preference = discrimination; Difficult if looking is about equal to both
|
|
Habituation
Gradual decrease in response to/interest in a repeated stimulus Novelty preference: Human preference for anything new or different |
Experimental design: Present infant with a stimulus (interested), Keep on presenting it (interest declines), Infant said to be habituated, Present a different stimulus - Increased attention = distinguished stimuli
|
|
Habituation advantages
|
Human novelty preference means infants always prefer new stimulus, even if not very interesting
|
|
Habituation works well for ______ can look at ____ and _________ for hearing
|
vision, heart rate, sucking
|
|
Preference for faces, Haith, because faces are
|
3D, move, areas of high and low contrast, provide visual and aural stimulation
|
|
No initial preference for faces
|
Caron, Haaf, newborn infants show no preference for normal vs scrambled faces
|
|
Preference for faces develops
|
•1-month-old infants look at – hairline 57% of the time, eyes 30% of the time
•2-month-old infants look at – eyes 49% of the time, hairline 30% of the time |
|
Visual preference
|
Fantz (1965) showed that infants look longer at a patterned surface than a plain surface.
|
|
Object constancy
|
Perception/belief that an object remains constant, despite changes in the way it looks
Conditioning studies suggest that infants have innate knowledge of: shape constancy, size constancy |
|
Depth perception - Ability to judge distance of objects from ourselves, and from each other
|
Begins at 2-3 months, as infants learn to focus on objects at different distances
|
|
Visual cliff (Gibson & Walk, 1960; Campos, 1970)
|
2-m-olds simply curious ( heart rate); 6-m-olds (crawling) show fear, heart rate; won’t cross despite coaxing; Crawling allows better depth perc.
|
|
Auditory perception - Harder to tell if an infant is listening than looking
|
2 months, infants can locate sounds: shown through orienting towards stimulus; Reaction takes 2-3 sec; Takes time to learn to locate sounds accurately; Better at locating higher-than lower-pitched sounds - Takes several months to co-ordinate vision and hearing
|
|
Intermodal perception
|
Infants must be able to combine input from different senses to form a perception of unitary events or objects - Crucial for understanding the world
|
|
Classic study: Meltzoff & Borton (1979) - Tested one-mth-olds’ ability to integrate visual and tactile information
|
Intermodal perception - Infants sucked on smooth dummy or bumpy dummy; Then shown visual display of smooth and bumpy dummy; Looked longer at picture of dummy that they’d sucked; Replicated with newborn, breast-fed babies (Kay & Bower, 1994) - Suggests intermodal perception is an innate skill that improves with experience
|
|
Categorical thought
|
Co-ordinating visual and auditory perception allows deliberate learning = cognition
|
|
Coldren & Colombo (1994): 9-m-olds learned complex visual discriminations: Phase 1: infants viewed pictures differing in two dimensions (e.g., shape and colour)
|
If infant looked to “correct” dimension (e.g., red, not blue), rewarded by adult voice recording; If infant looked to “wrong” dimension (e.g., blue), no reinforcement provided; All succeeded in learning “correct” dimension
|
|
Coldren & Colombo - Phase 2: Changed the reinforcement rule
|
Reversal shift: same dimension, different value - Should be relatively easy… but only if infants are responding to actual dimension (not just sensation); Non-reversal shift: different dimension, different value; Should be more difficult… but only if infants are responding to both dimension and value (if just sensation, should be about the same as reversal); Suggests early use of abstract categories
|