Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
25 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
What is 'orthography'? |
The conventional spelling of a language |
|
Given that reading is a 'new' system/skill, why can we see heritability in individual differences in reading ability? Give 3 examples of primary systems that have been 'hijacked' by reading. |
Reading is parasitic on more primary systems that evolved for reasons other than reading - e.g. visual perception, auditory perception, motor control, memory, speech and language systems |
|
What are the two aspects of reading? |
Decoding: allows us to deal with the mechanics of reading
Comprehension: allows us to refer to our world knowledge to help understand words |
|
What is the alphabetic principle? |
The fundamental insight that the 26 letters of the alphabet code language via sound |
|
What is phonological awareness? |
Awareness of, and access to, the phonology (sound-structure) of language |
|
What are the three types of studies used to provide evidence for phonological awareness reading links? |
1. cross-sectional studies 2. longitudinal studies 3. training studies
|
|
Describe a cross-sectional study that shows the development of phonological segmentation abilities with age. |
Liberman and Shankweiler (1974) 4-6 year old children Task 1: syllable segmentation Task 2: phoneme segmentation
Results: 4 year olds succeeded in task 1 but failed task 2 5 year olds were better and 6 year olds were better still at task 2 |
|
Describe a longitudinal study testing children on various aspects as potential predictors of future word recognition/reading ability. |
Muter et al., 2004 4 year old children tested again at 5 and 6.
Tested on: 1. phonological awareness 2. word recognition 3. letter knowledge 4. receptive vocabulary 5. grammatical awareness
Results: 1-3 at age 4 were predictive of reading ability at age 6 (4-5 were not predictive)
|
|
Describe a training study testing whether phonological awareness is causally implicated in reading. |
Hatcher et al.,1994 7 year old children with reading disabilities Experimental conditions: 1. PA training alone 2. Reading practice alone 3. PA and reading training combined 4. untreated controls
2 x 30minute sessions for 20 weeks
Results: condition 3 lead to significant improvement in reading ability. conditions 1 and 2 did not differ significantly from controls |
|
Describe Hatcher's second reading-intervention training study (2006) that contrasted 10 and 20 week training programmes |
5-6 year olds at risk of reading disabilities 20 weeks of training or 10 weeks waiting followed by 10 weeks training
Training: 20 minute daily intervention alternating between individual and small-group sessions.
Improvement of reading ability shown for both groups after intervention. |
|
What is the 'reciprocal model' of phonological awareness and reading? |
Improved PA leads to improved reading Improved reading leads to improved PA |
|
What are the three stages of Frith's theory of learning to read? |
1. logographic stage 2. alphabetic stage 3. orthographic stage |
|
How is the logographic stage of Frith's model characterised? |
1. sight vocabulary of words recognised by overall appearance 2. no attending to individual letters 3. no ability to read unfamiliar words
|
|
How is the alphabetic stage of Frith's model characterised? |
1. starts to attend to individual letters 2. learns to convert graphemes into phonemes using letter-to-sound rules 3. can pronounce regular unfamiliar words but not irregular unfamiliar words |
|
How is the orthographic stage of Frith's model characterised? |
1. develops an orthographic strategy 2. orthographic units converted to more complex sound-bytes 3. can pronounce irregular words if similar in structure to known words 4. novel irregular words tackled using grapheme-phoneme mapping |
|
Give an example of a study demonstrating young children's visual picture-like recognition of words. |
'Environmental print' - considerable alterations of spelling in familiar brand logos made no difference to young children's recognition abilities
"Smaller" read as "yellow" 'because of the two long sticks' "Policeman" correctly identified from selection 'because its the long one' |
|
What are the three hallmarks of the alphabetic stage? |
1. successful non-word reading 2. regularisation errors 3. length effects |
|
Describe an experiment that suggests that the logographic and alphabetic stages may not be so clearly distinct from one another as Frith had thought. |
Rack et al., 1994 used 'logographic children' who couldn't read non-words
1. Taught children to associate consonant-only abbreviations with particular pronunciations 2. Abbreviations differed from the real words by either one phonetic feature (phonetic words: dbl-table) or two phonetic features (control words: kbl-table)
Prediction: if there was no awareness of individual letter importance, children should find the associations equally as easy to learn in both conditions
Results: 5 year olds were better at recognising the phonetic words than the control words |
|
What proportion of 10 year olds were able to read the word 'puscle' by analogy to 'muscle' |
only 39% - potential confound if the kids don't know the word muscle |
|
What is a rime unit? |
a combination of letters found at the end of a number of words with a fairly unambiguous pronunciation |
|
Describe Goswami's "clue word" paradigm |
Pre-test: read the four words beak peak lake nose
Analogy test: "beak is your clue word, it may help you read these other words"
Results: 1. pre-test reading of the words was not hugely successful in 5 year olds (supposedly logographic) 2. the cue word significantly improved reading of the rime-matched word (peak) even in logographic children |
|
Outline Share's (1995) self-teaching hypothesis |
1. phonological skills are essential and fundamental 2. decoding skills allow translation of printed words into their spoken form 3. through this, word-specific orthographic information (and language statistics) can be gathered and used for efficient word recognition |
|
Give two possible objections to Goswami's findings from the clue-word paradigm suggesting that children can use analogy to read unfamiliar words before even reaching Frith's alphabetic stage. |
1. overestimation of spontaneous analogy use due to prescriptive and artificial conditions used in the experiment 2. we may be seeing simple phonological priming rather than genuine orthographic analogy
|
|
Describe the effects of exposure and durability on orthographic Hebrew learning in 3rd grade learners found by Share (2004) |
1. reliable and equivalent learning following 1, 2 or 4 exposures 2. reliable and equivalent learning at 3-day, 7-day and 30-day post-tests in Hebrew
|
|
Is orthographic learning via self-teaching easier when the words are learnt with some semantic context? |
No -Nation et al., 2007 8-9 year old children Exposure phase: - context: target words were inserted into short stories 1, 2 or 4 times depending on the exposure conditions. - no context: children had to sort cards into words and non-words, target words appeared 1, 2, or 4 times depending on exposure condition
Test phase: children were asked which word they recognised from a list of the target, a homophone, and two orthographically and phonologically similar distractors.
Results: There was a main effect of exposure but no main effect of context and no interactions. |