Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
44 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
|
Analysis |
Separation of a whole into its component parts |
|
|
Synthesis |
Combination of parts/elements to make a whole |
|
|
Bias |
Prejudice/ inclination in favor of something |
|
|
Veiwpoint |
A persons perspective or outlook on something |
|
|
Inference |
A conclusión formed of data/ information |
|
|
Metacognition |
Awareness and/ or control of one’s own thinking process |
|
|
Deductive reasoning |
Reasoning from general information to reach a specific conclusion |
|
|
Inductive reasoning |
Reasoning from specific detail to reach a general conclusion |
|
|
Stereotype |
Oversimplified characterization of someone/ something |
|
|
Generalization |
Broad/ general statement that applies certain facts to a whole group |
|
|
Scapegoating |
Singling out person/ group to blame |
|
|
Slanter |
Inflammatory/exaggerated rhetoric/ language |
|
|
Bigotry |
Intolerance towards those that hold different views/beliefs/ideas |
|
|
Ethnicentrism |
An attitude that one’s ethnicity or culture is superior to another’s |
|
|
Rationalism |
Reliance on reason to gain understanding/knowledge/truth |
|
|
Empiricism |
Reliance on experiment, observation, experience to gain knowledge/ ubderstanding |
|
|
What is estemology |
The theory of knowledge |
|
|
Who are the four most important people |
1. Arastodal 2. Platos 3. Thales 4.socrates |
|
|
Knowledge |
Information/data |
|
|
Comprehension |
Understanding information |
|
|
Application |
Use it |
|
|
Evaluation |
To judge |
|
|
Primary source |
Person/thing directly connected or involved in event |
|
|
What a reasonable person would do in debate |
1. Good listeners 2. Study both side of the argument 3. Use evidence and facts to support claim 4. Claim/ thesis is clear 5. Don’t use stereos 6. Are open minded |
|
|
What are examples of unreasonable people |
1. Let emotions get the beat of you 2. Jump to conclusions 3. Use stereotypes 4. Bad listeners 5. Not prepared |
|
|
Ethnocentric example |
World war ll matiza believed they were superior. Japanese also became that way when fighting the emperor |
|
|
Bigotry example |
High intolerance the Artigas hate the neonatzis . Artigas don’t want them there. |
|
|
Stereotype |
Isn’t an effective way to argue. Isn’t accurate is based on characteristics. |
|
|
What methods did historians use |
1. Conclusions 2. Reasoning 3. Justification 4.logical |
|
|
Examples of primary sources |
1. Diary entries 2. Audio recording 3. Autobiography 4. Letters 5. Photos 6. Videos 7. Artifacts 8. Fossils |
|
|
Secondary source |
A person who isn’t involved in the event |
|
|
Example of secondary dource |
1. Newspaper 2. Website 3. News cast |
|
|
How do we gain knowledge |
1. Senses 2. Through our reasoning minds 3. Through language 4. Emotions |
|
|
What did Plato believe |
That in a spiritual realm there is a perfect human being and humans in earth are a reflection of that who aren’t perfect. |
|
|
What did aristato believe |
Believed you gained knowledge through your senses |
|
|
How many laws did god give Moses |
613 laws not just the 10 commandments |
|
|
What would the Hebrews sacrifice to please the gods |
They sacrificed animals |
|
|
How would the Hebrews get rid of their sins |
They would sacrifice the animal they thought was perfect to cast all their sins into the animal they sacrificed. Which is called scapegoating |
|
|
What is democritas |
Came up with what size itis and the number of atoms |
|
|
Pythagoris |
Assigned numbers to things |
|
|
What did aristato do |
Collected data through observation/ information |
|
|
Plato |
Was rationalism came up with the theory that everything dies not perfect |
|
|
What is suspension of disbelief |
1. Aware of your own thoughts 2. Analyzing |
|
|
Metacognition |
1. Aware of own thoughts while thinking 2. Mindful |
