Reading...
Play button
Play button
Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
20 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
|
Consent is irrelevant to appropriation |
DPP v Gomez
|
|
|
You only need to assume one right
|
R v Morris
|
|
|
The appropriation requires some personal contact or interference with the property, not just causing victim to use it in a way that benefits D
|
R v Briggs
|
|
|
Can't steal more than once, but appropriation can be continuous or instantaneous
|
R v Atakpu
|
|
|
Things in action: intangible rights capable of legal enforcement – bank account balance, agreed overdraft
|
Chan Man-Sin v R
|
|
|
Overdrawing agreed OD is not appropriating thing in action (but see Fraud Act)
|
R v Navvabi
|
|
|
Property is not:
- Reading confidential information |
Oxford v Moss
|
|
|
Property is not:
- Swiping electricity |
Low v Blease
|
|
|
The property must belong to another at the time of the dishonest appropriation (ie not be a petrol station/restaurant case)
|
Edwards v Ddin
|
|
|
Where you get property from another and have a LEGAL obligation to deal in a certain way, as against you it belongs to another
|
TA68, s5(3)
DPP v Huskinson |
|
|
can't be just contractual, has to be an obligation to deal with THAT
property (or proceeds) |
R v Hall
|
|
|
GHOSH test (any crime with dishonesty MR):
|
R v Ghosh
i. Did D do something that is dishonest by the standard of ordinary, honest people? ii. Did D know his action was dishonest by such standards? |
|
|
With taking cash, you intend to permanently deprive even if you intend to repay (due to exact notes and coins)
|
R v Velumyl
|
|
|
Taken item offered back to buy is intention permanently to D
|
R v Raphael
|
|
|
Selling used underground tickets “disposing of regardless of rights”
|
R v Marshall
|
|
|
Stole correctly believing bank would reimburse company – this is also disposing of thing regardless of owner's right
|
Chan Man-sin v R
|
|
|
You can treat borrowing as ItPD if:
|
R v Lloyd
a. It is equivalent to outright taking or; b. Returned thing is “spent” or “goodness is gone” |
|
|
Knowledge that payment on the spot is required
i. It can be a defence if D has agreed with V he will pay later |
R v Vincent
|
|
|
Intention to avoid payment
- not liable if you intend to return and pay |
R v Allen
|
|
|
Use of credit cards eceeding limit is a representation
|
R v Lambie
|
