• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/30

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

30 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
"GBH" mean "really serious harm"
DPP v Smith
A wound requires both layers of skin to be broken
Moriarty v Brookes

academically a bleeding scratch is sufficient
No matter how serious internal bleeding, not a wound if no skin broken
JJC v Eisenhower
Psychiatric harm can be GBH if serious enough
R v Burstow
“maliciously” do harm
R v Parmeter

intention or recklessness to do SOME harm (ABH)
ABH = any hurt or injury calculated to interfere with health or comfort of the victim
R v Miller
ABH = any psychiatric harm if recognised condition
R v Ireland

R v Chan-Fook
Indirectly place something to cause a trip is inflicting unlawful force
DPP v K
Punching baby’s mother caused her to drop baby was assault on the baby
Haystead v Chief Constable of Derbyshire
Simple assault can be acts or words
R v Ireland
Simple assault requires only apprehension of infliction of immediate unlawful personal force
Fagan v Met Police
For simple assault, only need to fear assault could occur immediately
R v Burstow
A conditional threat is also an assault
Read v Coker
Intention or recklessness as to V’s apprehension of unlawful personal force
R v Venna
Test for recklessness to personal force is subjective
R v Spratt
CPS Charging Standards GBH:
- permanent disability
- loss of sensory function
- major break
- big blood loss
- lengthy treatment/incapacity
CPS Charging Standards ABH:
- minor cuts (where treatement)
- extensive bruising
- temp loss of consciousness
- minor fractures
- bbroken nose
Generally the defence of consent is only when no harm is done or intended
Collins v Wilcock
Sport within the rules or spirit of the game counts as a form of consent
R v Barnes
Attorney General ref 6 of 1994 exceptions to general consent rule
- Sport
- Surgery
- Not allowed manly fisticuffs
- Dangerous exhibition (circus)
Tattooing, piercing and circumcision are lawful acts
R v Brown
Consent is invalid if:
R v Brown
- Corrupts young men
- spreads disease
- excessive level of pain
- breeds and glorifies cruelty
No consent if risk of harm beyond transient
R v Emmett
A parent or person in loco parentis can use reasonable force to discipline a child
R v Hopley
Defence of Duress:
R v Graham

1. subjectively believe threatened with death/serious injury (self or another)
2. (objective) person of reasonable firmness would have given way
Self-defence can be pre-emptive
R v Bird
Self-defence discretion in decision making in the heat of the moment
R v Palmer
A person is judged in self-defence on the facts as they honestly (not reasonably) believe them to be
R v Williams
Mistake due to voluntary intoxication negatives self-defence
R v O'Grady
R v Hatton
Mistake due to psychiatric ailment negatives self-defence
R v Martin