Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
30 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
"GBH" mean "really serious harm"
|
DPP v Smith
|
|
A wound requires both layers of skin to be broken
|
Moriarty v Brookes
academically a bleeding scratch is sufficient |
|
No matter how serious internal bleeding, not a wound if no skin broken
|
JJC v Eisenhower
|
|
Psychiatric harm can be GBH if serious enough
|
R v Burstow
|
|
“maliciously” do harm
|
R v Parmeter
intention or recklessness to do SOME harm (ABH) |
|
ABH = any hurt or injury calculated to interfere with health or comfort of the victim
|
R v Miller
|
|
ABH = any psychiatric harm if recognised condition
|
R v Ireland
R v Chan-Fook |
|
Indirectly place something to cause a trip is inflicting unlawful force
|
DPP v K
|
|
Punching baby’s mother caused her to drop baby was assault on the baby
|
Haystead v Chief Constable of Derbyshire
|
|
Simple assault can be acts or words
|
R v Ireland
|
|
Simple assault requires only apprehension of infliction of immediate unlawful personal force
|
Fagan v Met Police
|
|
For simple assault, only need to fear assault could occur immediately
|
R v Burstow
|
|
A conditional threat is also an assault
|
Read v Coker
|
|
Intention or recklessness as to V’s apprehension of unlawful personal force
|
R v Venna
|
|
Test for recklessness to personal force is subjective
|
R v Spratt
|
|
CPS Charging Standards GBH:
|
- permanent disability
- loss of sensory function - major break - big blood loss - lengthy treatment/incapacity |
|
CPS Charging Standards ABH:
|
- minor cuts (where treatement)
- extensive bruising - temp loss of consciousness - minor fractures - bbroken nose |
|
Generally the defence of consent is only when no harm is done or intended
|
Collins v Wilcock
|
|
Sport within the rules or spirit of the game counts as a form of consent
|
R v Barnes
|
|
Attorney General ref 6 of 1994 exceptions to general consent rule
|
- Sport
- Surgery - Not allowed manly fisticuffs - Dangerous exhibition (circus) |
|
Tattooing, piercing and circumcision are lawful acts
|
R v Brown
|
|
Consent is invalid if:
|
R v Brown
- Corrupts young men - spreads disease - excessive level of pain - breeds and glorifies cruelty |
|
No consent if risk of harm beyond transient
|
R v Emmett
|
|
A parent or person in loco parentis can use reasonable force to discipline a child
|
R v Hopley
|
|
Defence of Duress:
|
R v Graham
1. subjectively believe threatened with death/serious injury (self or another) 2. (objective) person of reasonable firmness would have given way |
|
Self-defence can be pre-emptive
|
R v Bird
|
|
Self-defence discretion in decision making in the heat of the moment
|
R v Palmer
|
|
A person is judged in self-defence on the facts as they honestly (not reasonably) believe them to be
|
R v Williams
|
|
Mistake due to voluntary intoxication negatives self-defence
|
R v O'Grady
R v Hatton |
|
Mistake due to psychiatric ailment negatives self-defence
|
R v Martin
|