• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/31

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

31 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Voluntary Test

-Totality of circumstances


-inherently coercive?




Was the suspects free choice impaired by improper police conduct under the "totality of circumstances"?




1. Environment/physical circumstances


2. characteristics of accused


3. police conduct (36 hours = coercive)

Deliberate Solicitation Standard (Massiah)

-No interrogation or its equivalent without counsel after ∆ is indicted


-Prohibits eliciting statements after RTC attaches


-Can continue investigation but no solicitation


-6th amendment violation

Focus Test

When focus shifts from general inquiry to specific interrogation RTC attaches

Specific Interrogation

focus on accused and purpose is to elicit confession

Waiver of RTC

must be intelligently and knowingly done

Inculpatory statements

evidence that shows or tends to show a person's involvement in an act or evidence that can establish guilt

Exculpatory statements

evidence that shows someone's innocence

Miranda focus

Confession/interrogation admissibility depends on if there was a warning and a knowing/intelligent waiver (5th amendment)




Applies to custodial interrogation, not unprompted confession or general questioning on scene

Miranda Warning

You have the right to remain silent, anything you saycan and will be held against you in the court at law. You have a right to anattorney, if you can not afford one, one will be provided for you.”

Knowing and Intelligent Waiver

express

Impeachment Exception

Comments or confessions inadmissible under Miranda can still be used to impeach the witness

Custody Test

-Objective inquiry


-reasonable person in the suspect's position would understand freedom to terminate questioning and leave?


-juvenile - reasonable standard for minor's age ( so long as age is known or should have been known to officer)

Interrogation

direct questioning and the functional equivalent. Any words or actions by the police outside the norm that the police know are reasonably likely to elicit an incrimination response.

Undercover confessions

Not subject to Miranda because not in a police dominated atmosphere

Miranda Rights

No obligation to inform suspect of alleged crime or potential charge.

Miranda Right to Silence

Must invoke or subsequent statements can be used.

Silence can't invoke right


Triggered when D states he is invoking.

Waiving Right to Silence

Implied or obtained before interrogation

Right to Silence before and after arrest

Can be used against you unless you expressly invoke your right

Miranda Right to Counsel

-Triggered when invoked


-Expires after 14 day "break" in Miranda custody


-Crime specific - RTC only applies to one offense at a time

Interrogation of ∆ with appointed counsel

permissible until and unless ∆ invokes his right to have counsel present

Miranda "Public Safety" Exception

∆ statements are admissible because the confession was made in response to questions asked to protect the public safety and not for investigation

Fruit of the Poisonous Tree Doctrine

if source is gained, anything gained from it will be tainted as well

Evidence from Un-Mirandized Admissions

Admissible as long as statements are not coerced

Confessions after subsequent warning

Admissible if sufficient break and warning to advise ∆ that they have right to not speak to police.




Must have sufficient break and questioning done in good faith

Invoking Miranda Rights

Lies with ∆. RTC can't be invoked by family or attorney. Police have no obligation to inform ∆ of attorney's attempts to contact.

5th Amendment Violation

Must initiate legal proceedings or be used at trial to violate right

Christian Burial Speech

D requested attorney, adversarial proceedings were initiated - gov't CANNOT elicit incriminating responses.




D can still initiate conversation.

Offense Specific RTC

can question regarding different offenses where RTC has not attached

Indirect Questioning from Gov't

Can't use to elicit statements once RTC has attached

Passive listening from Gov't

Passive listening is ok but active questioning is not. Must make distinction between the two. D has burden to demonstrate police took action beyond listening.

Massiah Confession

Depends on whether active solicitation or passive listening




Informant being paid?