• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/54

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

54 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Which amendments are binding on the states
8th Amendment - grand jury and excessive bail
4th amendment
prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures and the exclusionary rule
exclusionary rule
applies to 4th 5th and 6th amendment
fruit of the poisonous tree
evidence obtained from exploitation of the illegally obtained E must also be excluded
exceptions:
1. evidence obtained from a source independent of the original illegality
2. intervening act of free will by the defendant
3. inevitable discovery
limitations on the exclusionary rule
1. inapplicabe to grand juries, civil proceedings, internal agency rules and parole revocation proceedings
2. good faith reliance on law, defective search warrant or clerical error
3. use of excluded E for impeachment purposes
4. miranda violations
enforcing the exclusionary rule
a D is entitled to have the admissibility of evidence or a confession decided as a matter of law by a judge out of the hearing of the jury
Fourth amendment
provides that people should be free from unreasonable searches and seizures - governmental seizures of persons, including arrests
what constitutes a seizure
occurs when a reasonable person would believe that she is not free to leave or terminate an encounter with the government
Arrests
occurs when the police take a person into custody against her will for purposes of criminal prosecution or interrogation
Need:
1. probable cause
2. warrant for home arrest for a nonemergeny arrest
probable cause
trustworthy facts or knowledge sufficient for a reasonable person to believe that the suspect has committed or is committing a crime
investigatory detentions (AKA stop and frisk)
if police have a reasonable articulable suspicion of criminal activity or involvement in a completed crime supported by articulable facts
automobile stops
police may not stop a car unless they have at least reasonable suspicion to believe that a law has been violated
Roadblocks
Valid if roadblocks:
Every car - stop cars on the basis of some neutral articulable standard
and be designed to serve purposes closely related to a particular problem pertaining to automobiles and their mobility
pretextual stops
if the police reasonably believe a driver violated a traffic law they they may stop the car even if their ulterior motive is to investigate whether some other law - for which the police lack reasonable suspicion - has been violated
Search and seizure
if there a 4th amend right? govt. agent where D has a reasonable expectation of privacy
valid warrant if not was there a valid warrantless search and seizure
reasonable expectation of privacy
need standing and item cannot be held out to the public
when affidavit will be held invalid
D must establish all
1. a false statement
2. intentionally or recklessly included the false statement
3. the false statement was material to the finding of probable cause
when is a warrant precise on its face?
look for particularity
exception to warrant requirement
1. incident to lawful arrest
2. automobile search
3. plain view
4. consent
5. stop and frisk (Terry)
6. hot pursuit and evanescent evidence
search incident to arrest
arrest must be lawful
police may search the person and areas into which he might reach to obtain weapons or destroy evidence
automobile exception
if police has probable cause to believe that a vehicle contains fruits instrumentalities or E of a crime, they may search the whole vehicle and any container that might reasonably contain the item for which they had probable cause to search
plain view
police may make a warrantless seizure when they
1. are legitimately on the premises
2. discover E, fruits or instrumentalities of crime or contraband
3. see such E in plain view
4. have probable cause to believe that the item is E, contraband or a fruit or instrumentality of crime
consent
must be voluntary and intelligent
look for reasonable apparent authority to consent
hot pursuit, evanescent E and other emergencies
no general emergency exception
1. police in hot pursuit of a fleeing felon may make a warrantless search and seizure without a warrant E likely to disappear before a warrant can be obtained and
3. contaminated food or drugs, persons injured or threatened with injury, and burning fires justify warrantles searches and seizures
administrative inspections and searches
inspectors must have a warrant for searches of private residences and commercial buildings but the probable cause required to obtain a warrant is more lenient that for other searches
searches at the border or its equivalent
citizens and noncitizens do not have any 4th amendment right at the border
wiretapping and eavesdropping
need a warrant - valid warrant authorizing a wiretap may be issued if:
1. there is showing of probable cause
2. the suspected persons involved in the conversations to be overheard are named
3. warrant describes with particularity the conversations that can be overheard
4 the wiretap is limited to a short period of time
5. the wiretap is terminated when the desired information has been obtained
6. return is made to the court, showing what conversations have been intercepted
Miranda warnings
look for custody + interrogation, failure to give the warnings violates a D's 5th amendment right to be free from compelled self-incrimination not 6th amend right to counsel
pretrial identification
only to establish that the victim or witness is remembering the D from the crime and not the proceedings
post-charge lineup
suspect has a 6th amend right to counsel
bad out of court identification remedy
unconstitutional identifications is exclusion of the in-court identification unless the witness there is an independent source for the in-court identification
pretrial procedures
need a preliminary hearing to determine probable cause to detain, bail must be set unless charge is a capital one
Prosecutorial duty to disclose exculpatory information
Brady: whether willfull or inadvertent violates the Due Process and will be reversed if D can show
1. E is favorable to him bc it impeaches or is exculpatory
2. prejudice has resulted
competency to stand trial
incompetent if he lacks a rational as well as factual understanding of the charges or proceedings or lacks sufficient present ability to consult with his lawyer with a reasonable degree of understanding
insanity v. competency at trial
insanity is a defense to a criminal charge based on the defendant's mental condition at the time he committed the charged crime (jeopardy attaches)
incompetency to stand trial is not a defense to the charge but a bar to trial, based on D's mental condition at the time of trial - can be tried if D regains competency
pretrial publicity
excessive pretrial publicity prejudicial to the D may require change of venue or retrial
right to a fair trial
1. public trial
2. unbiased judge
3. jury likely gives E reasonable consideration
4. cannot compel D to stand trial in prison clothing
5. cannot be visibly shackled unless for safety
5. jury cannot be exposed to influence favorable to the prosecution
right to jury trial
6th amend applied to states through 14th amend
no right unless offense is serious if imprisonment for more than six months
jury minimum is 6, must be fairly selected from representative cross-section of community
use of peremptory challenges for racial and gender based discrimination
Batson! equal protection claim
1. defendant must show facts or circumstances that raise an inference that the exclusion was based on race or gender
2. prosecutory must offer a race-neutral explanation for the strike
3. judge determines whether the prosecutor's explanation was the genuine reason for striking the juror or merely a pretext for purposeful discrimination
right to impartial jury
can question juror whether they have racial bias
can strike if opposed to death penalty if juror's view would prevent or impair performance of duties
effective assistance of counsel
6th amendment, effective assistance is generally presumed
for IAC must show:
deficient performance
but for deficiency the result of the proceeding would have been different
right to confront witnesses
6th amend right to confront adverse witnesses
not absolute, face to face not not required when preventing such confrontation serves an important public purpose
judge may remove a disruptive defendant and a D may voluntarily leave the courtroom during trial
introduction of a co-D's confession
2 persons tried together, 1 has given a confession that implicates the other, even where the confession interlocks with the D's own confession
1. all portions referring to the other D can be eliminated
burden of proof and sufficiency of the evidence
due process requires in all criminal cases that the state prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt
presumption of innocence is a basic component of a fair trial
D's have burden to prove affirmative defenses
plea bargaining
a plea bargain will be enforced against the prosecutor and the D but not against the judge who does not have to accept the plea
taking a plea
must determine that the plea is voluntary and intelligent must be in open court on the record
need:
nature of the charge and the crucial elements of the crime charged
2. maximum possible penalty and any mandatory minimum
3. that he has right plead not guilty and a plea of guilty waives the right to trial
remedy is to withdraw the plea and pleading anew
collateral attacks on guilty pleas after sentence
can be set aside for:
1. involuntariness
2. lack of jurisdiction
3. ineffective assistance of counsel
4. failure to keep the plea bargain
double jeopardy
5th amend.
attaches in a jury trial at the empaneling and swearing of the jury
in bench trials when witness is sworn
exceptions to double jeopardy permitting retrial
1. hung jury
2. manifest necessity to abort the original trial
3. may retry a D who has successfully appealed unless ground for reversal was insufficient evidence
*4. charges may be reinstated after a D breaches her plea bargain
separate sovereigns
separate sovereigns can try a defendant for the same offense
but municipalities are considered part of the state and so both a state and its municipality cannot validly try a D for the same offense
collateral estoppel
D may not be tried or convicted of a crime if a prior prosecution by that sovereignty resulted in a factual determination inconsistent with one required for conviction
privilege against compelled self-incrimination
who: anyone may assert the privilege
when: any case - privilege must be claimed in civil proceedings to prevent the privilege from being waived for a later criminal prosecution
remember only testimonial E is protected and only compelled testimonial E is privileged
elimination of privilege
a witness may be compelled to answer questions if granted adequate immunity from prosecution
federal prosecutors may not use evidence obtained as a result of a state grant of immunity and vice versa
juvenile rights
written notice of charges
assistance of counsel
opportunity to confront and x-examine
right not to testify
right to have guilt established by proof beyond reasonable doubt
jeopardy attaches after delinquency