• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/17

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

17 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Sources of duty for omission liability

(1) statute


(2) K


(3) CL status relationship (ex: parent, spouse, Doctor)


(4) Isolation or assumption of care (deterring others from rescue), and


(5) creation of risk

Limits on scope of omission liability

(1) no duty to risk your own safety


(2) duty depends on facts known to D


(3) no duty to perform acts not physically capable of


(4) getting help can discharge duty

Malice in law

Intent to commit a wrongful act, meaning an intentional act...



-without justification or excuse or mitigating circumstances


-D knows it’s wrong


-Direct, natural, and highly probable relevant harm


-With conscious disregard of risk of harm (similar to MPC recklessness)

Robbery

Specific intent crime that requires:



(1) Larceny: trespassers taking and carrying away of another’s personal property with intent to steal.


(2) Either:


- From a person OR


- Presence of a person


(3) By either:


-Force OR


-Intimidation



DEFENSES:


-Claim of right


-Mistake


-Intent to return


+ Specific intent defenses

Burglary

Breaking and entering into another person’s dwelling or other specified place with the intent to commit a felony.



- breaking and


- entering


-the dwelling house of another


- at nighttime


- with intent to commit a felony inside.

Constructive possession (Kier)

Must prove both that D had:



(1) power over drugs, and


(2) intent to exercise control over drugs

Attempt: Common Law rules of thumb

- Physical or Dangerous Proximity



- Indispensable Element: D must have acquired control over every essential aspect or element of the crime



- Unequivocality: the act must be inexplicable as a lawful act (res ipsa loquitur).

MPC Attempt: Substantial Step

The act must:



- tend toward commission of act


- be inexplicable as a lawful act


- be more than mere prep

Attempt: Actus Reus

Objectivist: (Acosta) how close to completion?



Subjectivist: (MPC) Substantial step. Was the D far enough from starting?


Accomplice Liability: Actus Reus

A person becomes an accomplice when he aids, abets, encourages, or assists another another in the commission of crime.

Accomplice: Men’s Rea

Same as principle.



CL: intent to aid, plus intent to promote or facilitate the crime.



MPC: purpose of promoting or facilitating the commission of the offense.

Murder

The unlawful killing of a human being with malice aforethought.


(1) intent to kill


(2) Intent to inflict grave bodily injury, resulting in death;


(3) Extreme recklessness (depraved heart murder); or


(4) Felony murder where felony is inherently dangerous to human life.

First degree murder

Willful, premeditated, and deliberate killing.



Felony murder, ex. Robbery, rape, arson, burglary.

Manslaughter

Unlawful killing of a human being without malice aforethought.



Voluntary Mansl.:


Intentional killing in the heat of passion or EMED



Invol. Mansl.:


Reckless killings that do not rise to the level of depraved heart murder.

Depraved heart murder

2nd degree murder: implied malice



Recklessness, and



Plus factor, ex. High objective probability of death, base or antisocial motive, wanton disregard for value of human life.

Four elements for self defense to be satisfied under common law

(1) Threat of deadly force, actual or apparent


(2) Threat must be unlawful and immediate


(3) D must believe subjectively that defensive force is necessary to prevent death/serious bodily harm


(4) That belief must be reasonable (based on reasonable person with same life experiences because there is no time for reflection - objective)

Necessity def. CL

To prevail on a defense of necessity, the defendant must believe that:



-Prevention: Committing a crime will prevent a significant harm or evil from occurring



-No Alternatives: No adequate alternative method of avoiding the harm is available, and



-Lesser Evil: The harm caused by the crime is less serious than the harm prevented by committing it