• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/16

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

16 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Common Law Homicides

1. First Degree Murder


2. Second Degree Murder


3. Voluntary Manslaughter


4. Felony Murder


5. Murder by Extreme Recklessness/DepravedHeart


6.Involuntary Manslaughter


7.Reckless Manslaughter


8. Murder with intent to inflict SBH

MPC Homicides

*No Degrees


1. Murder


2. Manslaughter


3. Voluntary Manslaughter


4. Involuntary Manslaughter


5. Negligent Homicide

Common Law


Murder Elements

1. Malice aforethought


A. intent to kill


i. deadly weapon on vital part of body


ii.natural and probable consequences


B. actual cause


i.but for


C.proximate cause


i.foreseeable

Common Law


First Degree Murder

1. Intent with premeditation


A. Carroll


i. intent = premeditation


B. Guthrie


ii. reflection/deliberation =premeditation


a. emotional state may indicate no premeditation


b. premeditation does not transfer with


out intent


C. Guthrie Not Met


ii. second degree murder

Common Law


Voluntary Manslaughter

1. kill in the heat of passion

2. must have been adequate provocation


i. JX differences on words may be enough,


not generally


3. before cooling time


4.reasonable person standard


i.jury weighs actors distinctive characteristics


a. physical make up


b. knowledge/experiences


c. temperament not considered


5. JX differences on killing anon-provoking party

Common Law


Felony Murder

1. Causes a death


2. in thecommission of a felony


i. attempting


ii. committing


iii. fleeing until safety


3. Felony must be inherently dangerous


i. dangerous in the abstract


ii. dangerous in the commission


4. independent felony requirement


i. must not be the only purpose to commit


the injurious act

Common Law


Involuntary Manslaughter

4. Involuntary Manslaughter


1. Kill


2. with negligence


Common Law


Gross Reckless Manslaughter

1. Gross deviation for standard of care


2. creates a substantial and unjustifiable risk of death


3. death results

Common Law


Murder by extreme recklessness or depraved heart

1. callously disregard a substantial and unjustifiable risk (Russian roulette case)


i. probability analysis


a. the greater the risk, the more likely it is


extreme recklessness

Common Law


Murder with intent to inflict SBH

1. intent to commit SBH


2. death results


i. death was unintentional


a. only SBH was intentional


3. must be grave BH


i. trivial is not sufficient

MPC


Murder

1. purposefully or knowingly killed


2. recklessly killed with extreme indifference to value of human life


3. willful, deliberate, and premeditated killing

MPC


Manslaughter

1. Recklessly; or


2. killed under extreme emotional or mental disturbance


i. must be a reasonable explanation or excuse for the disturbance


a. POV is judged by the actors situation

MPC


Voluntary Manslaughter

1. Extreme mental or emotional disturbance at the time ofthe killing


i. no provocation required


ii. many ways including long standing distur-


bances


2. reasonable explanation or excuse for the disturbance


i. considered from the defendant’s perspec-


tive


ii. physical condition taken into consideration


a. psych condition not taken into account

MPC


Involuntary Manslaughter

1. Kill


2. with recklessness


i. known from the defendant’s perspective


3. Recklessness defined:


i.could the jury find a unjustified substantial


risk


ii.with a conscious disregard for that risk

MPC


Negligent Homicide

Negligent Homicide


1.committed negligently

Causation

1. foreseeability of the superseding cause


2. defendant’s contribution to the result


3. was the intervening cause a response to the


defendant’s own actions


4. did the defendant still intend the ultimate re-


sult.