• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/7

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

7 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

R v Woollin

A 2 step test to determine oblique intention:


1. Objective test: virtual certainty barring any unforeseen circumstances.


2. Subjective test: defendant realised a substantial risk.

R v Moloney

Intention is not clearly defined but differs from desire or motive.

R v Latimer 1886

An authority for transferred malice - belt richoteched and hit a women.

R v G 2003

Reinstated the subjective test for recklessness.



Test: D must be aware of the risk and the risk must not be reasonable.


It is more than stupidity.



R v G applies to all criminal offences where mens rea recklessness is an option.

What is the case authority for criminal restlessness?

R v G 2003.



This case was about the minors who lit a fire and caused £1 million in damages.

What are the elements of common assault?

1. D performs an act


2. by which he internationally or recklessly


3. causes another to apprehend


4. immediate


5. unlawful violence

What is the actus reus for common assault?

D causes V to apprehend personal physical violence.