• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/8

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

8 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Cause-in-fact
"but for" causation - if the harm would not have occurred unless D had engaged in the conduct (But for D's conduct, the chain of events would have never started)
Omission as a cause
an omission can satisfy the legal req. of causation b/c as a result of D not acting, harm that was unavoidable occurs
Concurrent Causation
cause-in-fact doesn't have to be met. Occurs when 2 indep. causes in fact occur at the same time & either of them would have been the cause
Prox. Cause
Satisfied if (1) intended or reasonably F (2) Not too remote or accidental as to fairly hold D responsible
-there can never be more than 1 prox. cause
Dep. Intervening Cause
an intervening cause that was intended or reasonably F by D, or sufficiently related to his conduct, to impose crim responsibility for causing the harm.
1. Reslts in a finding that D prox. caused the harm
2. The fact that another causal agent contributed to the result will not relieve D of responsiblity
Indep. Intervening Cause
another actor or event causes the harm in such an unexpected or unusual manner that D will not be held crim. L for causing it
1. Harm was not intended by D or it was not reasonably F
2. Direct cause of harm was sufficiently fortuitious or coincidental & unconnected w/D's conduct so as to make it unjust to punish him for causing the harm
3. Breaks the causal chain & necessities a finding of no prox. cause
MPC But-for Causation
must est. cause in fact & any other specific causal req. imposed by code or law def. the offense
2. no causation if harm would've occurred w/o D's conduct
3. add'l. analysis when result occurs is diff. from result intended
MPC concurrent causation & transferred intent
If the actual result differs from what the actor p, k, r, n, would occur then he is not responsible for the actual results unless:
a. a diff pers or property was harmed
b. D actually caused a lesser harm than contemplated