• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/5

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

5 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

symbolic interactionism

Herbert Mead




how human behaviour is an outcome of both social conditions (poverty, wealth) and the ways individuals respond to, interpret and intereact with those conditions




1. humans act towards things on the basis of the meanings that the things have for them


2. the meaning of such things is derived from the social interaction one has with other people


3. meanings are handled in and modified through an interpretative process




human behaviour as the outcome of social circumstances as well as how those circumstances were understood

differential association


(interactionist)

Edwin Sutherland




1. Criminal behaviour is learned


- process of learning


- learning takes place in intimate social groups




2. Criminal behaviour is learned in interaction with other people in a process of communication


- develops over time with interaction with other criminals




3. Principal part of learning of criminal behaviour occurs within intimate personal groups




4. When crim behaviour is learned, it includes


a. techniques of committing the crime


b. specific direction of motives, drives, rationalisations and attitudes


- person must learn techniques and also feel positively about it




5. direction of motives (good or bad) is learned from definitions of the legal codes as favourable or unfavourable




6. person becomes a delinquent because of an excess of definitions favourable to violation of law over definitions unfavourable to violation of law




7. differential associations vary in frequency, duration, priority and intensity




8. process of learning criminal behaviour by association with criminals, involves all mechanisms that are involved in any other learning




9. criminal behaviour is not explained by needs and values

social learning theory


(interactionist)

Burgess and Arker




if crime is result of interacting with criminals, how do you explain police?




percieved positive reinforcements for imitating modelled criminal patterns

labelling


(interactionist)

Frank Tannenbaum


Howard Becker




crime and criminality are outcome of negative social reactions to behaviour defined as criminal




primary and secondary deviance




primary = first instance - more sporadic and unstable - casual offending




people labelled as deviants is identifies as deviant



neutralisation

Gresham Sykes


David Matza




people are temporarily relapsed from society's normative hold




techniques of neutralisation


- denial of reponsibility


- denial of injury


- denial of victims


- condemnation of condemners


- appeal to higher loyalties