Cr Logics

Front 1

Megatrash loses more and more money in lawsuits, yet its
profits increase!! How?

Back 1

A decrease in competition could reasonably be
expected to accomplish this.

Front 2

People who do painting by themselves and People who hire to paint their houses. Painting causes Lead poisoning. So an article needs to be published on how to paint your home?
How to weaken this?

Back 2

The published article will allow those who hire people to paint to do by themselves even it involves more risk!!

Front 3

Whats is the meaning of this question?
"Which one of the following, if true, argues most strongly against the recommendation of X"

Back 3

Which one of the following weakens the recommendation of X?

Front 4

If a question is given whose conclusion is based on a similarity/analogy. How would you weaken such argument

That long-term cigarette smoking can lead to health problems including cancer and lung disease is a scientifically well-established fact. Contrary to what many people seem to believe, however, it is not necessary to deny this fact in order to reject the view that tobacco companies should be held either morally or legally responsible for the poor health of smokers. After all, excessive consumption of candy undeniably leads to such health problems as tooth decay, but no one seriously believes that candy eaters who get cavities should be able to sue candy manufacturers.

<OptionDO>
<Option>no one should feel it necessary to deny the scientifically well-established fact that long-term cigarette smoking can lead to health problems</Option>
</OptionDO>
<OptionDO>
<Option>people who get cavities should not be able to sue candy manufacturers</Option>
</OptionDO>
<OptionDO>
<Option>the fact that smokers health problems can be caused by their smoking is not enough to justify holding tobacco companies either legally or morally responsible for those problems</Option>
</OptionDO>
<OptionDO>
<Option>excessive consumption of candy will lead to health problems just as surely as long-term cigarette smoking will</Option>
</OptionDO>
<OptionDO>
<Option>if candy manufacturers were held responsible for tooth decay among candy eaters then tobacco companies should also be held responsible for health problems suffered by smokers</Option>
</OptionDO>

Back 4

By Providing another analogy which is different from the one provided. Or provide a difference in the same analogy to its similarity


The argument attempts to compare the legal and moral responsibility of the tobacco
industry (which many consider to be harmful) with that of the candy industry (which most
consider benign). The argument is therefore most vulnerable in the areas in which the two
industries are most dissimilar. Choice (E) strikes at this vulnerability by noting the rather
glaring difference between cavities and lung cancer.

Front 5

Difference between selected employees and all employees

Back 5

selected narrows the scope of the argument, while all keeps everyone into picture.

Front 6

3 out of 4 hospitals give novex to patients, so its effective.

Weaken this....

Back 6

3 out of 4 hospitals give novex to patients not because its ineffective but because its least expensive.