Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
38 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
|
Marbury Vs Madison |
Judicial Review |
|
|
Weeks Vs US |
Exclusionary Rule (fed only) |
|
|
Carroll Vs US |
Permitted warrantless searches of automobiles |
|
|
Mapp Vs OH |
exclusionary Rule applied to states |
|
|
Chapman Vs US |
who has standing to grant consent to enter |
|
|
Gideon Vs Wainwright |
state felonies have right to free council |
|
|
Escobedo VS IL |
Right to council prior to custodial interogation |
|
|
Miranda vs AZ |
Police must advise right to council prior to custodial interrogation |
|
|
Katts Vs US |
Wiretapping falls under 4th amendment -closed phone booth |
|
|
Terry Vs Ohio |
Pat down/frisk, interrogative detetion if the police officer has a reasonable suspicion |
|
|
Michigan Vs Long |
Pat down of the interior of the vehicle with reasonable suspicion |
|
|
Maryland vs buie |
Pat down of property when the searching officer possesses a reasonable belief based on specific and articulable facts that the area to be swept harbors an individual posing a danger to those on the arrest scene. |
|
|
Chimel vs California |
search incedent to arrest the officers may search the person and the immediate area |
|
|
Arizona vs Gant |
search incident to arrest warrented search of the interior of the car no longer automatic |
|
|
Coolidge vs NH |
warrant authorizing the seizure of Coolidge's automobile was invalid because it was not issued by a "neutral and detached magistrate." |
|
|
Brewer vs williams |
functional equivalent of a custodial interrogation |
|
|
Nix vs williams |
inevitable discovery exception |
|
|
US vs Leon |
Good faith exception to the exclusionary rule |
|
|
Delewar Vs Prouse |
Supreme court prohibited random trffic stops |
|
|
Florida v Jardines |
K-9 units not permitted on normal knock and talk routines |
|
|
RI v Ines |
"Spontaneous utterance" officer doesn't need to tell you to be quiet |
|
|
NY v Quarles |
Public safety exception |
|
|
California Vs Greenwood |
Garbage is considered abandoned property and doesn't require a warrant |
|
|
California vs Hodari |
foot persuit is not a seizure |
|
|
Davis vs US |
You need to clearly state you want to talk to an attorney |
|
|
Ohio vs Robinet |
Police when seeking consent, doenst need to tell you you can deny |
|
|
Ren vs US |
Pre textual stops allowed as long as the reason to stop is valid |
|
|
Maryland vs Wilson |
During a traffic stop officers may order everyone out of the car |
|
|
Illinois vs Wardlow |
Reasonable suspicion prior to investigative detention |
|
|
Indianopolis vs Edmonds |
Check points designed specifically for drug detection are unconstitutional |
|
|
IL vs Lidster |
Police can conduct an investigative checkpoint under specific guidlines |
|
|
Maryland vs Pringle |
If a carload of people are caught with drugs and nobody claims them, everybody goes to jail |
|
|
Samson Vs CA |
Parolees may be subject to search by there parole officers without need of proof |
|
|
US vs Jones |
Crawling under the car to place tracking device was tresspassing |
|
|
US vs Grubbs |
Anticipatory warrant permitted |
|
|
Georgia vs Randolf |
when seeking a consent, police must honor a no over a yes |
|
|
Graham vs Connor |
unreasonable force |
|
|
Characteristics of an investigative investigation |
brief cannot move no force |
