• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/28

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

28 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Barron v Baltimore
Bill of Rights restrained only nat'l gov, not states and cities, so states are allowed to make laws that violate bill of rights
Gitlow v New York
holds that freedom of press and speech (1st amendment) are important and protected by due process clause of 14th amend and cannot be impaired by states as well as fed gov
Lemon v Kurtzman
said aid to church related schools must:
1) have a secular legislative purpose
2) effect cannot advance or inhibit religion
3) cannot foster gov "entanglement" with religion
Engel v Vitale
state officials violated first amend when they wrote a prayer to be recited vy NY schoolchildren
Near v Minnesota
1st amend protects newspapers from prior restraint. (allows for newspapers to publish whatever they want)
Roth v US
ruled that "obscenity is not within the area of const protected speech or press" (so is not protected by the 1st amend)
Miller v California
avoided defining obscenity by letting community standards determine whether material is obscene
New York Times v Sullivan
est guidelines for determining whether public officials and public figures could win damage suits for libel. (must prove that said libel was made with "actual malice" and reckless disregard for truth)
Mapp v Ohio
4th amend protection against unreasonable searches and seizures must be extended to states as well as to the fed gov.
Miranda v Arizona
sets guidelines for police questioning of accused persons to protect them against self-incrimination and to protect their right to counsel
Gideon v Wainwright
everyone accused of a felony in a state or federal court has right to an attorney or else his conviction will be reversed
Gregg v Georgia
upheld const of death penalty and that it does not constitute as cruel & unusual punishment
McCleskey v Kemp
upheld const of death penalty against charges that it violated 14th amend since minority defendants were more likely to receive death penalty than white defendants
Schwann v Charlotte-Mecklenberg County Schools
ordered busing of students to racially balance schools
Griswold v Connecticut
when idea of right to privacy was first brought up. ruled that bill of rights cast "penumbras" (unstated liberties implied by explicitly stated rights) to protect right to privacy
Roe v Wade
held that state ban on all abortions was unconst. Forbade state control over 1st trimester of pregnancy, permitted states to limit abortions to protect mother's health in 2nd trimester, and permitted states to protect fetus in 3rd trimester
Scott v Sandford
slave who escaped into a free state enjoyed no rights as a citizen and congress has no authority to ban slavery in western territories (invaliated Missouri Compromise)
Plessy v Ferguson
allowed for "equal but separate" accommodations for whites and blacks
Brown v Board of Education
school segregation is unconst bc it violated 14th amend guarantee of equal protection
Korematsu v US
upheld const of internment of 100,000 Japanese Americans during WWII
Reed v Reed
ruled for 1st time that gender discrimination is unconst bc it violates equal protection of 14th amend
Craig v Boren
est "medium scrutiny" standards for determining gender discrimination
Regents of the UC Davis v Bakke
students cannot be admitted solely based on race but it can be a contributing factor in college admissions
Adarand Constructors v Pena
fed programs that classify people by race should be unconst. created criteria for evaluating affirmative action programs
New York v US
Congress does not have the power to force states to implement regulations.
Guinn v US
ruled grandfather clause unconst
Grutter v Bollinger
Schools may consider race as a part of the admissions process as long as it is only one factor in an individualized process.
Marbury v Madison
est judicial review which allowed the courts to declare any law of congress unconst