• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/19

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

19 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
  • 3rd side (hint)
What assumptions can we make about Processes?
1. Processes are the source of many improvement opportunities.
2. Processes are made up of activities
3. Improving processes means improving the way activities are performed.
4. Therefore, management of activities (NOT costs) is the key to successful control in continuous improvement environment.
Activity Based Management
focus on activities to improve customer value and, therefore profits.
Process Value Analysis
focuses on accountability for activities rather than costs
PVA is concerned with 3 things: what are they?
1. Driver Analysis
2. Activity Analysis
3. Performance measurement
Driver Analysis
identifying factors that are the root causes of activity costs
Activity Analysis
= the process of identifying, describing, and evaluating the activities an organization performs.
Value-added activities
activities necessary to remain in business. They contribute to customer value or help meet organizational needs.
Nonvalue-added activities
unnecessary activities that are not valued by internal or external customers.
Kaizen costing
constant incremental improvements to existing processes and products. Cost reduction can be gained through activity management.
Activity management can reduce cost in four ways:
1. Activity elimination = eliminating non-value added
activities.
2. Activity selection = activities are caused by design strategy selection. The lowest cost design strategy should be selected.
3. Activity reduction = decreases in the time and resources required by an activity.
4. Activity sharing = use of economy of scale
Performance measurement
= assessment of how well an activity was performed and the results achieved. There are three dimensions of activity performance:
1. efficiency = the relationship of activity outputs to activity inputs
2. quality = doing the activity right the first time it is performed
3. time = time required to perform an activity
Financial Measures of Activity Efficiency
Financial measures of performance should provide specific information about the dollar effects of activity performance changes. They will indicate potential and actual savings. Financial measures of activity efficiency include:
1. Reporting Value and Nonvalue-Added Costs
2. The role of Kaizen Standards
3. Benchmarking
4. Activity Flexible Budgeting
5. Activity Capacity Management
1. Reporting Value and Nonvalue-Added Costs
A firm should identify and report the value and nonvalue-added costs of each activity. Value-added costs are the only costs an organization should incur. The value-added standard calls for the elimination of nonvalue-added activities. Therefore a value-added standard identifies the optimal activity output.
By comparing actual activity costs with value-added activity cost, management can assess the level of activity inefficiency and the potential for improvement. (see exhibit 12-3 on page 436)
2. The role of Kaizen Standards
Kaizen costing = concerned with reducing the costs of existing products and processes. It really means, reduce existing nonvalue-added costs.

A kaizen standard reflects the planned improvement for the upcoming period.
3. Benchmarking
uses best practices found within and outside
the organization as the standard for evaluating and improving
activity performance.

1. Internal Benchmarking = best practices units share information with other

2. External Benchmarking = comparison with others outside your organization
1. Competitive benchmarking = comparison of activity performance with direct competition
2. Functional benchmarking = comparison with firms in the same industry but do not compete in the same markets.
3. Generic benchmarking = comparison of best practices of noncompetitors outside a firm’s industry
4. Activity Flexible
= the prediction of what activity costs will be as activity output changes.
5. Activity Capacity Management
= the number of times an activity can be performed.
Financial-Based versus Activity-Based Responsibility Accounting

Responsibility Accounting systems are defined by four elements:
1. Assigning responsibility
2. Establishing performance measures or benchmarks
3. Evaluating performance
4. Assigning rewards
There are three types of responsibility accounting systems
1. Financial-based responsibility accounting systems = assign responsibility to organizational units and express performance measures in financial terms.
2. Activity-based responsibility accounting systems = assigns responsibility to processes and uses both financial and nonfinancial measures of performance, thus emphasizing both financial and process perspectives.

See exhibits 12-12, 12-13, 12-14, 12-15 on pages 446 through 448.


3. Srategic –based responsibility accounting systems (chapter 13)