• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/66

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

66 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Mutual Assent
Offer & Acceptance
The same bargain at the same time
"A meeting of the minds"
Is a subjective meeting of the minds necessary?
NO.
Courts use OBJECTIVE MEASURE
Parties are bound to the ______ intention that he manifests to the other(s).
Apparent
Elements to a contract
Mutual Assent
Consideration
Any defenses to creation of the K?
Manifesting Assent Mnemonic
OPP:
Acceptance by OFFER: manifestation of assent to terms thereof made by the offeree in a manner invited or required by the offer
Acceptance by PERFORMANCE: requires at least part of what the offer requests to be performed or tendered AND includes acceptance by a performance which operates as a return promise
Acceptance by PROMISE: requires that the offeree complete every act essential to the making of the promise
Types of contracts Mnemonic
EII:
Express
Implied-in-Fact
Implied-in-Law
Express Contract
An agreement manifested by words - oral or written
Implied-in-fact
An agreement manifested by conduct - other than written or oral language
Implied-in-law
"quasi-contract": not a contract at all but an obligation imposed by a court despite the absence of a promise in order to avoid an injustice;
Constructed by courts to avoid unjust enrihment - permit the PL to bring action in restitution to recover the amount of the benefit conferred by the D
Common Law Contract Law
In most jurisdictions, contract law is not codified, and thus the primary source of general contract law is caselaw
UCC
Uniform Commercial Code:
has been adopted by every state except Louisiana.
Application of UCC
covers all transactions for the SALE OF GOODS other than securities and leases.
It applies to any party;
It's not limited to merchants altho individual provisions may be
Goods
any tangible thing that his moveable:
ex: growing crops or timber, unborn young of animals and other identified things attached to land, regardless of who severs them from the land provided that they can be removed w/o causing material harm to the land; currency exchanged as a commodity; minerals or the like or a structure or its materials to be removed from realty that are to be SEVERED BY THE SELLER
Goods does NOT encompass
- intangible rights such as intellectual property
- investment securities
- money which si the medium of payment for goods
- minerals or the like or a structure or its materials to be removed from realty that are to be severed by the buyer
Sale
transfer of title for a price.
If the primary function of the contract is to provide a service, the UCC doesn't apply, even if an incidental sale of goods occurs
Merchant
one who deals in goods of the kind or otherwise by his occupation holds himself out as having knowledge or skill particular to the practices or goods involved in the transaction OR who employs an agent or broker in such occupation.
Good Faith
Every contract for the sale of goods imposes an obligation of good faith dealing on all parties in its performance and enforcement;
- "Honesty in fact in the conduct or transaction concerned."
Merchants are subject to an additional good faith standard which requires "honesty in fact and the observance of reasonable commercial standards of fair dealing in the trade."
Offer is accepted in 1 or 3 ways:
- Promise
- Performance
- Either Promise or Performance (ee has the choice b/t) **MOST COMMON
Offer accepted by PROMISE
ee accepting must promise to make a binding K b/c acceptance must match up with offer
Offer accepted by PERFORMANCE
has to be performance not promise for ee to accept
Legal enforceability of K
if both parties intend and desire that their "agreement" not be legally enforceable it will not be
Intent to Contract
Party's intent is deemed to be what a reasonable person int he position of the other party would think
Intent to put into writing later
If parties agree on all points but decide tehy will put their entire agreement into a formal written document, the preliminary agreement may or may not be binding. The parties' intention controls
Does outward expression supercede inward intent?
Yes ; ex: Lucy v. Zehmer - Zehmer shoed by words and actions he intended to contract, although inwardly he was joking
Elements of OFFER
CCC:
Commitment
Communicate
Certainty
Commitment element of OFFER
Commitment: (promise or undertaking) rather than a mere invitation to negotiate; must be INTENT to enter into a K; intent found in language, surrounding circumstances, prior practice and relationship of the parties
Communication element of OFFER
- to have the power to accept, the offeree must have knowledge of the offer
- proposal must be communicated to him/her
What communications DO NOT constitute an offer?
- opinions about future results, including professional opinions
- statements of intention
- invitations to submit a bid
- price estimates
- ads, catalogs, and mass mailings
- auctions with reserve
When is the offer effective?
An offer is not valid until RECEIVED by the offeree or his agent
Duration of offer
If the offer has a stated time within which the acceptance m ust be made, any attempted acceptance after the expiration of that time will fail and will merely constitute a counter-offer by the offeree.
- If no specific time is stated within which the offeree must accept, it's assumed that the offeror intended to keep the offer open for a reasonable period of time
- generally, the time for accepting an offer begins to run from the time it is received by the offeree. If there's a delay in delivery of the offer of which the offeree is aware, th eusual inference is that the time runs from the date on which the offeree would have received the offer under ordinary circumstances
Revocation of offer
With limited exceptions, an offer is generally revocable at any time prior to acceptance
Communication of Revocation
An offer may be revoked by any words that communicate to the offeree that the offeror no longer intends to be bound. An offer is also revoked by action that is inconsistent with the intent to be bound once the offeree learns of such inconsistent action
Offers that MAY NOT be revoked where...
1. there is an option contract in which the offeree gave consideration for an irrevocable offer for some period of time
2. the offeree relied on his detriment upon an implied or express promise by the offeror not to revoke if such detrimental reliance was foreseeable by the offeror
3. offeree relied on his detriment upon the offer itself if the such detrimental reliance was reasonably foreseeable by the offeror.
4. in case of a unilateral contract, the offeree began performance of the promised act to any extent
5. in goods contracts, a merchant indicates in signed writing that an offer to buy or sell goods will be held open for a stated time or a reasonable time if no time is specified, not to exceed three months, if no consideration if given
Effective time of Revocation
A revocation is effective upon recept by the offeree.
Termination of the Offer
An offeree's power to accept an offer is terminated by:
- death or insanity of the offeror or offeree
- death or destruction of a person or thing essential to performance
- the offeree's rejection of the offer, which can't be reinstated by the offeree's subsequent attempted acceptance
- the offeree's counter-offer, which impliedly manifests a rejection of the offer
- revocation of the offer
- experiation of the offer
Unilateral
Promise for an act
- offeror-promisor would promise to pay upon COMPLETION of the requested act by the promisee - once act is complete, then contract is formed
Bilateral
Promise for a Promise
- each party is BOTH a promisor and promise
EX: A promises to sell B for X-amount and B promises to purchase item at the X-amount
(Most Ks are Bilateral- each party has a right and a duty)
Preliminary negotiations
if a party desire to contract to solicit bids, it's not an offer but merely a basis for preliminary negotiations
Advertisements
not generally offers to sell, offers to begin negotiations UNLESS:
- specific terms: if it contains a particular number then it probably is specific enough to be an offer
- words of commitment: these suggest an offer
Auctions
not usually an offer but rather a solicitation of offers.
Unless sale is said to be w/o reserve the auctioneer may withdraw the goods from the sale even after the bidding has started
Types of Acceptance
Bilateral: exchange of mutual promises; a promise for a promise
Unilateral: acceptance by performance; a promise for an act
Silence as Acceptance?
Silence is NOT acceptance unless:
- offeree uses services having opportunity to reject and knowing that compensation was required
- where offeror has made it clear that silence is acceptance
- b/c of previous dealings, offeree should notify
Knowledge of Offer
- must be mutual assent
- must have knkowledge of the reward/offer in order to be possible to have made an acceptance
- if starts without knowledge however LEARNS BEFORE FINISHING act and then completes the act, K is formed
- exceptions - gov't agencies might still owe reward
Motive
must have present intent - look at surrounding circumstances - motive for responding doesn't count
- motive irrelavant as long as it's done voluntarily
Modes of Acceptance
- true contract ALWAYS has a promise
- at least one promise (unilateral vs. bilateral contracts)
- where offeror invites acceptance by choice of offeree, then the beginning of the performance acts as a promise to complete the performance
Elements / Ways to terminate power of acceptance
- by counteroffer or offeree rejection
- lapse of time
- revocation by offeror
- death/incapacity
Revocation by Offeror
- can revoke any time before acceptance
- offer revoked before money tendered
- if offeree acquires reliable info that offeror has taken action to revoke offer, then offer revoked
Indirect Revoke of Offer
an offeree's power of acceptance is terminated when the offeror takes definite action inconsistent with an intention to enter into the proposed contract and the offeree acquires reliable information to that affect
Tender
if offeree begins the performance, that constitutes acceptance
When does an acceptance become effective?
1. The offeror may specify when the acceptance will be effective
2. Absent such specification, an acceptance is effective when sent, if sent by reasonable means
3. If an acceptance is sent by inappropriate or unreasonable means, the acceptance will be effective upon receipt
4. With option contracts, an acceptance isn't operative until received by the offeror
Lapse of Time
Power of acceptance is terminated at time specific in offer, or by a reasonable time. If not stated, acceptance valid if mailed before midnight on day when offer received.
- when conversations end, offer ends, unless otherwise stated
Option Contract
where offer invites offeree to accept by performance, and not promise, the beginning of performance creates option contract

if offer only asks for performance and ee starts performing, by starting to perform that creates an Option Contract (offeror can't revoke during time ee is completing his performance
Do proposals and inquiries reject offer?
No.
Mailbox Rule
time of acceptance by offeree is when put in the mail box; once in mail, offer deemed accepted; acceptance effective upon dispatch; rejection upon receipt; purpose is to protect offeree
- Doesn't apply to option contracts, firm offers, revocations, offers
- only applies when mode of acceptance is NOT stated
- if offeror wants to revoke and already in the mail by offeree, then can not (b/c already accepted) if revoke before offeree puts int he mail, then can (b/c revoke before accepted)
Counting days for Mailbox Rule
count from day after receipt and right up to midnight on due date
Mirror-Image Rule
Counteroffer rule:
acceptance must look exactly like offer, otherwise seen as counteroffer

UCC rejects this rule
Know that according to UCC, once you have K and one party tries to alter the deal/change terms
Know that if Option K, OR cannot revoke, EE can reject and then change his mind later
Rejection must be...
- received by the offeror
- if by mail - what amounts to a receipt (by mail) - person
- if accepting, when EE puts in mail
Under UCC § 2-207
Contracts for the sale of goods:
- it gives effect to a definite and seasonable expression of acceptance even though it contains additional or different terms from those offered, unless the offeree expressly makes the acceptance conditional on the offeror's assent to the different or additional terms
More under UCC § 2-207
At common law, the mirror image rule requires an acceptance to be exactly like the offer. The rule is reversed under the Uniform Commercial Code, however. Under UCC § 2-207, an acceptance is still an acceptance even though it states different or additional terms from the offer.
More under UCC § 2-207
The battle of the forms and its legal treatment is attributed to two factors. The first factor is the failure of the participants to read thoroughly the terms of the other party's form. The second factor is attributed to section 2-207 of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). Perhaps more criticism has been leveled against section 2-207 than any other provision of UCC. The section addresses contract scenarios in which commercial parties have failed to bargain effectively.
Section 2-207 attempts to answer three questions.
a) Does the exchange of the conflicting forms constitute a binding contract?

b) If a binding contract exists, what are the enforceable terms?

c) If the exchange of forms does not establish a contract, but the parties nonetheless perform, what are the terms of the contract established by conduct.

Unfortunately, judicial interpretation of section 2-207 varies widely, making the answers to these questions far from clear. Litigation of the battle of the forms derived from this section has produced hundreds of court decisions. A variety of alternatives and revisions have been proposed and debated and yet a definite resolution seems to be unreachable.
Do different terms invalidate a contract?
No. 2-207(1) states: a form sent within a reasonable time "operates as an acceptance" even tho it states different or additional terms.
Part one of UCC § 2-207
Ex: B sent order form to S. S sends back its "different" form confirming a sale. Is there a contract despite different terms?
YES.
Part two of UCC § 2-207
Whose terms control?
The additional terms are to be construed as proposals for ADDITION to the contract.
But if it's between MERCHANTS,
it automatically becomes part of the contract unless B has indicted an objection (The additional terms become part of the contract unless the merchant (B) objects) OR the additional terms "materially alter" the contract
Part three of UCC § 2-207
Provides that the K may be put into effect by conduct by both parties which recognizes the existence of a K even though the forms differ.
General overview of § 2-207
A contract is formed even when seller and buyer use different terms, and the seller's different terms become part of the contract unless these terms materially alter the contract or the buyer timely objects to these terms.