Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
8 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Harmonize
|
Purpose:
1. Show that the facts of a case with a rule you don't want does not fit your client's situation 2. Distinguis between similar cases |
|
What is the true goal of contract law?
|
Encourage people to make contracts.
|
|
What is the FIRST of four ways we compel people to make contracts?
|
1. Contract law gives the injured party the benefit of the bargain through expectancy damages (Hawkins)
|
|
What is the SECOND of four ways we compel people to make contracts?
|
2. Does not attempt to compel completion of the bargain (Groves)
|
|
What is the THIRD of four ways we compel people to make contracts?
|
3. Does not attempt to punish breacher (ACME).
|
|
What is the FOURTH of four ways we compel people to make contracts?
|
4. Does use personal circumstances to limit expectancy damages
|
|
ONE of two philosphies explaining contracts
|
Amoral Law & Economics School of Posner - contract rules are presentingly designed to maximize the wealth by encouraging efficient breaches
|
|
TWO of two philosphies explaining contracts
|
Moral School of Fried - curernt rules do not maximize wealth as much as the moral rule
|