Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
52 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
What is an offer?
|
A manifestation of an intention to contract - words or conduct showing commitment
|
|
What is the test as to whether there is an offer?
|
DE, CL, UCC - Objective test - whether a reasonable person in position of the offeree would believe his assent creates a K
|
|
In Delaware, is an ageement to agree enforceable?
|
No.
|
|
Is this an offer: White t-shirts for $10, first come first serve.
|
Yes, advertisements that state "first come, first serve" constitute an offer
|
|
Is there still a K if the price term is missing?
|
Common law - no K
UCC - K exists (unless there is a price term and its ambiguous) |
|
How can an offeror revoke? (2 ways)
|
1. direct communication
2. action inconsistent w/ continued willingness to deal and offeree finds out |
|
When can an offer not be revoked? (4 situations)
|
1. option K supported by consideration
2. Firm Offer Rule - UCC, signed writing by merchant promising to hold the offer open for some period of time 3. Detrimental reliance that offeror could reasonably expect (general K and sub K) 4. Beginning performance in a unilateral K |
|
How does an offeree terminate an offer? (3)
|
Common Law
1. rejection 2. counter offer 3. conditional acceptance (mirror image rule) |
|
What is the mirror image rule?
|
Rule at common law that acceptance with new terms is treated like a counter offer so a K is not formed (comes into play with leases)
|
|
Explain Battle of the Forms
|
2-207, UCC
A response to an offer with additional terms is treated as an acceptance unless it states that it is expressly conditional on acceptance of the new terms If one party is not a merchant - the new terms are merely a proposal If both parties are merchants - terms get in unless they materially change the offer, offeror objects |
|
What are the two rules to consider where there is an acceptance with additional terms?
|
1. common law - mirror image rule
2. UCC - battle of the forms 2207 |
|
How is an offer terminated by operation of law?
|
1. death of party prior to acceptance
2. destruction of proposed K's subject matter 3. supervening illegality |
|
Can you accept by completing performance?
|
Yes, as long is it is was the offer called for and the offer has notice of the performance.
|
|
What are the requirements of accepting by full performance?
|
1. full performance of what the offer called for (ex. offer $1k to paint my house white -- you can't paint it red and get paid)
2. offeror must have notice (or his performance is excused) |
|
Explain the doctrine of part performance in accepting an offer.
|
Must be part of actual performance to make the offer irrevocable. Preparation, no matter how detrimental to offeree, will effect offeror's ability to revoke
|
|
Will initiation of performance require offeree to finish?
|
For bilateral Ks yes. There is an implied promise to perform.
For unilateral Ks no. Once performance starts the offeror cannot revoke but the offeree can stop at any point |
|
What happens when there is conditional acceptance and then conduct indicating a contract?
|
Common Law - treated like an acceptance of a counter offer
UCC - treated like a new K based solely on the conduct |
|
What is the mail box rule?
|
Acceptance is effective when its mailed.
Exception - option K acceptance must be received by the deadline |
|
Revocation of offer is mailed, acceptance of offer is mailed at the same time. Revocation is received first. Is there a K?
|
Yes, mail box rule says that acceptance happens when it is mailed. Revocation is not effective until it is received.
|
|
Under the UCC what happens when the buyer sends an invoice to the seller and the seller responds by sends the wrong goods?
|
We treat it as an acceptance and immediate breach.
|
|
What is the accomodation exception?
|
If the seller sends the wrong goods with an explanation (ex. I'm all out of red widgets) then there is NO K and NO breach.
|
|
How can you accept an offer to buy goods for prompt/current shipment?
|
UCC - by either promptly promising to ship the goods or prompty shipping the goods
|
|
What are the elements of consideration?
|
1. Bargain (exchange for promise or act)
2. Legal value (adequacy is irrelevant as long as its not sham consideration) |
|
What is the pre-existing legal duty rule?
|
DE & CL - new consideration is required for K modification unless:
1. different consideration is promised, 2. promise to ratify a voidable obligation 3. pre-existing duty is owed to a 3rd person rather than promissory, 4. unforseen difficulty is so severe that it would excuse performance UCC - no new consideration is required, only that it be done in good faith |
|
True/False: Part payment for release is not consideration.
|
True - if the debt was due and undisputed
False if debt was not due or amount due is disputed |
|
What is the mutuality requirement?
|
If only one party is bound to perform, the promise is illusory and not enforceable.
A promise to choose one of several alternatives for performance is illusory unless every one involves a legal detriment to the promisor |
|
What is promissory estoppel? (4 elements)
|
1. a promise
2. reasonable and foreseeable reliance 3. detriment 4. enforcement of promise is necessary to avoid injustice |
|
What is another name for promissory estoppel?
|
detrimental reliance
|
|
True/False. In DE, a K made under seal is enforceable without other consideration.
|
True. In DE the seal is somehow a substitute for consideration
|
|
Can a new promise be consideration?
|
Yes, if the obligation is unenforceable (ex. SOL), the new promise is enforceable if in writing.
|
|
How is a new promise enforceable consideration?
|
If the obligation was not enforceable and the new promise is in writing, it acts as a substitute for consideration.
|
|
What is "absense of mutal assent"?
|
A defense to the formation of a K.
|
|
What are the 6 types of cases where D can argue a lack of mutual assent?
|
1. mutual mistake
2. unilateral mistake 3. mistake by intermediary 4. latent ambiguity mistake 5. misrepresentation 6. nondisclosure |
|
What are two defenses to enforcement?
|
1. statute of frauds
2. unconscionability |
|
What are 3 defenes to formation?
|
1. absence of mutual assent
2. absence of consideration 3. public policy/illegality |
|
What are the 3 general types of defenses to contracts?
|
1. formation
2. lack of capacity 3. enforcement |
|
What are the 3 elements of mutual mistake?
|
1. mistake concerns a basic assumption on which the K was made
2. mistake has a material adverse effect on the agreed-upon exchange 3. the adversely affected party did not assume the risk of the mistake |
|
What is a latent ambiguity mistake?
|
when there was a misunderstanding because
1. parties use a material term that was open to 2 reasonable interpretations 2. each party attaches a different meaning 3. neither party knows or has reason to know the term is open to 2 interpretations |
|
In DE, for about how long can an employee covenant not to compete be?
|
Normally about 1 year, the trend has become that 2 years is too long
|
|
In DE, can a doctor be enjoined not to compete?
|
No, but you can specify liquidated damages under the K for violation.
|
|
Explain employment Ks in DE.
|
Presumed at will employment if no term of years is provided.
To rebut, employee must show 1. she suffered intentional discrimination b/c of race 2. evidence of disparate treatment of her and similarly situated persons, and 3. employee intentional discrimination resulted in adverse employment action |
|
In DE, what are the elements of undue influence?
|
1. person subject to influence
2. person with opportunity to influence 3. results indicate undue influence If parties are in a confidential or fiduciary relationship, equity rsises a presumption against the validity of a transaction |
|
True/False: Duress requires more than taking economic advantage of another.
|
Usually true.
|
|
When must a contract be in writing?
|
MY LEGS
Marriage Year - can't perform K in a year Land Executors - promises to pay estate out of own funds Goods - of more than $500 Surety - guranteeing to answer for debt of another if he doesn't pay |
|
When does a K for goods not have to be in writing?
|
1. less than $500
2. more than $500 but, goods are specially manufactured written confirmation of an oral agreement between merchants admission in pleeding or court that K for goods existed, or partial payment/delivery made and accepted |
|
True/False: A lifetime contract can be performed within a year.
|
True
|
|
How do you satify the SOF? (3 general ways)
|
1. performance
2. writing 3. judicial admission |
|
How do you satisfy the SOF with performance?
|
Common Law - only full performance satisfies (not part)
UCC - part performance satisfies the SOF only to the extent of the part performance (i.e. extent of delivered goods) For real estate - full payment or possession w/ part payment or possession w/ substantial improvement works |
|
Under common law, what is needed in writing to satisfy the SOF?
|
All material terms; the who (parties) and the what (bargained for)
1. identity of the parties 2. identification of the K's subject matter 3. terms and conditions 4. recital of consideration, and 5. signature of the party to be charged |
|
Under the UCC, waht is needed in writing to satify the SOF?
|
1. indicate its a K for sale of goods
2. indicate the quantity 3. be signed by party denying a K exists (price is irrelevant under UCC) If for a lease, it must describe the length and cost |
|
What is the equal dignity doctrine?
|
If you are authorized to enter into an agreement subject to the SOF, then your authority must be in written documentation
|
|
When must K modification be in writing?
|
When modification puts K into SOF territory or when modification keeps K in SOF territory
If K calls for modification to be in writing: CL - ignore the langue and apply standard rules, UCC - follow the K unless waived |