Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
36 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Fisher v Bell
|
An advertising display is generally an invitation to treat.
D charged with offering for sale a flick knife in his shop window. Sign displayed name of knife with price. |
|
Partridge v. Crittenden
|
an ad in a publication is simply an invitation to treat.
D was charged with offering a live wild bird contrary to law. |
|
Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball
|
advertisements of reward (ie- will pay you £x if…) will usually be offers (resulting in contracts). Also, displayed ability to waive need for communication of acceptance (acceptance was by completing the specified actions in this case.
The defendants, the proprietors of a medical preparation called “The Carbolic Smoke Ball,” issued an advertisement in which they offered to pay 100l. to any person who contracted the influenza after having used one of their smoke balls in a specified manner and for a specified period. The plaintiff on the faith of the advertisement bought one of the balls, and used it in the manner and for the period specified, but nevertheless contracted the influenza |
|
Barry v. Davies
|
If auctioneer in a unilateral agreement refuses to accept the highest bid, the highest bidder will have a claim in damages against the auctioneer.
|
|
Routledge v Grant
|
An offer can generally be revoked at any time before acceptance, even if the offeror has said he will leave it open for a specified period of time.
|
|
Mountford v Scott
|
Exception to Routledge if offeree has given (or promised) something for the offeror in return for keeping offer open.
C paid £1 for the option to buy V's house for £10000, exercisable within six months. V purposrted to revoke the offer. C subsequently sought to exercise option. |
|
Byrne v Van Tienhoven
|
Generally the revocation must be communicated to the offeree.
|
|
Shuey v US
|
offer made to the public at large may be revoked through the same channel as it is made provided the revocation is given the same prominence.
|
|
Dickinson v Dodds
|
Revocation can be made through a reliable third party.
|
|
Errington v Errington and Woods
|
In Unilateral contracts, generally offeror can not revoke once offeree has started to perform the act of acceptance.
Father bought a house in his own name, and allowed his son and daughter-in-law to live in it. He promised them that if they paid the mortgage instalments he would transfer the house to them. It was an offer of a unilateral contract as the couple didn't promise to repay the mortgage, they simply did so. When the father died his widow sought possesion of the house. It was held that the father's promise was irrevocable so long as the couple continued to pay the instalments. |
|
Hyde v Wrench
|
counter offer iimplied rejection of orginal offer
D offered to sell farm for £1000. The C at first made a counter offer of £950, but two days later for £1000 and tried to accept the orginal offer. D refused and C sued. Was held that no contract existed. |
|
Stevenson v McLean
|
Request for information
|
|
Entores v Miles Far East Corp
|
acceptance must be communicated
If the postal rule doesn't apply, retraction of an acceptance is clearly possible unless and until the acceptance is actually communicated, because until that point there will not be a binding contract. Teletext acceptance will be effective when it would be reasonable to expect the recipient to have read it. |
|
Adams v Lindsell
|
Generally, a letter of acceptance will be binding when posted.
|
|
Holwell v Hughes
|
Created requirements for postal rule
|
|
Felthouse v Bindley
|
Silence cannot be used as a means of accepting an offer.
|
|
Balfour v Balfour
|
presumption in social and domestic situations that parties did not intend to create legal relations.
|
|
Merritt v Merritt
|
Balfour assumption can be rebutted if: it is a matter of high consideration, parties are not on good terms, or a formal agreement in writing exists.
|
|
Edwards v Skyways
|
In Commercial interactions there is a very strong presumption of contractual intention, which is difficult to rebut.
|
|
Powell v Lee
|
Acceptance can be given via the authorized agent of the offeree or the offeree him or herself.
|
|
Harvela Investments Limited v Royal Trust Company of Canada Ltd
|
depending on the circumstance an invitation for tenders may give rise to a unilateral contract.
|
|
Blackpool and Fylde Aero Club v Blackpool Borough Council
|
If an invitation to tender is met by a conforming application the tenderer has the right to be considered.
|
|
Stilk v Myrick
|
Performance of an existing contractual duty owed to the other party will not normally amount to sufficient consideration for a promise by the other party to pay extra money.
|
|
Elements of a legally binding contract
|
- Agreement
- Intention to be bound - Consideration - Certainty of terms |
|
Offers may be rejected by...
|
- Revocation of the offer
- Rejection by the offeree - Lapse of time |
|
Requirements for postal rule to apply
|
- Must be resonable to use post as a means of communication
- Be a properly posted letter - Offeror must not have excluded the rule either expressly or through implication |
|
Offer definition
|
an expression of willingness to contract on certain terms, made with the intention that it shall become binding as soon as it is accepted by the person to whom it is addressed.
|
|
Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v Boots
|
Authority that goods on display are an offer that is accepted by placing the items in the trolley.
|
|
Bilateral Contract
|
Where one party makes a promise in return for a promise from the other party.
|
|
Williams v Carwardine
|
A typical type of unilateral contract is an offer of reward.
|
|
s57(2) SGA 1979
|
Sale by auction is complete on the fall of the auctioneer's hammer.
|
|
Reserve price
|
Price agreed between the auctioneer and the seller as being the lowest price which the auctioneer may accept for the lot.
|
|
Lapse of Time
|
The offeror may specify that the offer will stay open only for a particular time. if not, the offer will terminate after a reasonable time.
|
|
Battle of the Forms
|
Where two businesses who are in negotiation purport to contract on their own standard terms which are likely to be different from the other's. This results in an exchange of standard terms. the auestion is whether there is a contract at all. Ct will try and find a contract but may be unable to.
|
|
Butler Machine Tool Co Ltd v Ex-cell-O Corp
|
Battle of the Forms example
C offered to sell machine to D. D accepted the offer but with caveat that the price would be fixed. C had clause in orginal contract allowing for price increase to match inflation. C delivered machine and tried to collect additional £2,800. Ct ruled that D's form of acceptance amounted to a couter-offer which the C had accepted by returning a tear off slip. Therefore D didn't have to pay extra money. |
|
Brogden v Metro Railway Co
|
In battle of the forms delivery of the machine might be regarded as acceptance by conduct of the last set of standard terms to be proffered. 'Last shot wins' mentatlity has developed.
|